User talk:Accounting4Taste
Omer Lavoie
I had written a very short entry on this Canadian officer which you deleted. I was in class when I wrote this up and intended later the same day to expand upon it, I mentioned this when I tagged the article for a hangon. The notibility of this person is his name is mentioned in the much larger article Operation Falcon Summit and you will find his name with an internal link that does not go anywhere but to a Create this page notice. I was reading the article Operation Falcon Summit and inquired as to the commander's involved, and, upon noticing that BOTH commanders did not have pages I, being the helpful person I am, created them as a base for expansion but just to give even some very basic information on this person for someone who is researching this topic (although I did plan on expanding both the articles later)and I believe that it is mentioned under the notibility policy that it says these are reasonable grounds to create these articles (As my other article on the 2nd higher ranking officer is a candidate for speedy deletion as well). I am new to Wikipedia and I just want to help, so please, if I am wrong on any of these points please feel free to correct me so I may learn to be better at creating articles, thank you for your time. Bretonnia (talk) 20:29, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Mapepire Balsain
Could you please restore the talk page at least. See User talk:CambridgeBayWeather#Deletion of Mapepire Balsain and User talk:Guettarda#Mapepire Balsain. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 03:26, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- I've brought this to the attention of User:Jwinius, a member of the reptiles project, with whom I've been working to eliminate superfluous redirects. Whatever he wants to have happen is fine with me; I note as though it seems he requested this deletion and if you type the name into the "Find" box, you get the appropriate article. I'm not sure what's going on here but I rely on User:Jwinius for scientific rigour. Accounting4Taste:talk 17:14, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- And at the request of User:CambridgeBayWeather, a fellow administrator, I've restored both the page and its talk page. I think I see what's going on here and I know that User:Jwinius has more science to offer than I do on why he wants this deleted. I'll help this discussion however I can. Accounting4Taste:talk 17:21, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry I forgot about this. I've replied at User talk:Jwinius#Mapepire Balsain. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 01:39, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
- And at the request of User:CambridgeBayWeather, a fellow administrator, I've restored both the page and its talk page. I think I see what's going on here and I know that User:Jwinius has more science to offer than I do on why he wants this deleted. I'll help this discussion however I can. Accounting4Taste:talk 17:21, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
KKK (Kl Krew Kamp)
I am confused upon why you have deleted my page. I do not understand the actions you are asking from me.
/Archive 1 /Archive 2 /Archive 3
View a deleted article
Hello. Is it possible to view the deleted article Nariat? I'm just exploring the speedy deletion system and I'm curious, as you deleted it before I got to it on the category page.
Oh, and I'd have labelled the Screaming Monkey's as nonsense rather than non-notable. Look at the album sales! :) Skittle (talk) 18:58, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. I quite see :P Skittle (talk) 19:03, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Spam W@@rz
Congrats, you're probrably the third person to delete that page! Well done. Anyway, here's the argument I was gonna post on it, when my computer crashed...
"...Has spam happened yet? And as you can see (or could see, hey you deleted the page) the spamming is restricted to the contestants discussion pages only. Also, spamming of said discussion page is only allowed if the said user filled in + placed the form I made on their user page."
Bring it back, or i threaten to make another page. Heck, I might even name it 'delete this page.'
Best wishes, Napster964 (talk) 20:00, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Article- Tasflow
I'm confused, if your an admin and you believed this article is a speedy delete, why didn't you delete it right away? Just wondering. Icestorm815 (talk) 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
University of Michigan Ballroom Dance Team
I think winning national and international contests is a claim to notability. I was in the process of cleanup when you deleted it. Gimmetrow 00:59, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
- I assume this means you'd like me to reinstate it? I'm not as convinced as you with respect to notability, but I will do that if you care to take on the task of improving it, noting that it's not possible to assess the claims of this organization because there are no citations; under the auspices of which international organization were these titles won? That would be a useful indicator of notability. I'm sorry it will take me a minute to find it, but you don't seem to have made any edits to it and that makes it more difficult to find. Accounting4Taste:talk 01:07, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
- "Unreferenced" isn't a criterion for speedy deletion. The article makes a reasonable, non-vandalistic claim to notability. Assessing the validity of that claim is an issue for AFD, not CSD. Gimmetrow 17:53, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Topic: Raymond Evans [Engineer} I am querying why the article was speed deleted after I had responded to a speedy deletion request and added a 'hold on' note with a justifying comment and also received an acknoweldgement. I thought that your action was rude and I feel offended, particularly given some of the vacuous individuals granted page space.
Your note above lists that the main page does not exist, however, I could see that it did exist. Perhaps I have not understood a procedure? Either way, I think that your action was hasty. Taffspur (talk) 16:34, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
- I think the two pages you're looking for are Wikipedia:Why was my page deleted? and Manners. Thanks for sharing. You have a nice day, now! Accounting4Taste:talk 17:18, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Closing AFD's
Ah, the joy! Basically any XfD is one of the few opportunities Admins get to play 'crat role - we have to determine consensus! I assume you're okay with the technical bits of the close (dead easy - just put {{subst:afdtop}} at the very top and {{subst:afdbottom}} at the bottom). You're still going to find them potentially controversial, so I'd stay clear of anything to horrible looking to begin with!. My understanding (and personal view) is that if in doubt keep. If there's been very little input, relist. I'd also recommend a quick check on any contributors user names you're not familiar with in case of WP:SPAs. Although XfD is not a vote, I'd still be guided by (say) 75% one way or the other determines consensus, unless there's sockpuppetry or new accounts at work. Best of luck! Pedro : Chat 20:31, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Not Left
No, I haven't left the website. And I do not wish to. At the time, I found some of the other administator's comments stupid..and I still do. I do apologise for yelling, and I would ask that you DO NOT "keep an eye" on me - that phrase sounds a little strange.
Regards.