User talk:GlassFET
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Welcome!
|
Note
I clear items from my talk page after I've read them. Removal of the item means that I've read it, whether or not I reply to it. GlassFET 17:41, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Article to check
GlassFET, can you check the article on Rick Warren? It is a mess of blog sources and unsourced content, and it reads more like a hit piece than a biography. I'd like to get it fixed, but I'm not sure where to begin.--Lyonscc (talk) 17:03, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
While you're at it, the article on Brian McLaren seems to be in similar straits. I'm not sure what it is with folks needing to make wikipedia their place for grinding axes against religious leaders.--Lyonscc (talk) 20:16, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
GlassFET
Stop being [personal attack removed] and telling me what to do! [Personal attack removed]. I am neither your child nor your ward - nor your subordinate for that matter. If you treat other editors with disrespect, as you have treated me, [personal attack removed]. Your assertions about my editing is [personal attack removed]. Before you deride me or my contributions to Wikipedia again have an EXTENDED investigation of my editing history: not a cosmetic, surface inquiry. Please demonstrate your assertion about "Original Research" or "POV". Those allegations are false and empty. I have demonstrated my knowledge and skill on Wikipedia. I challenge you to outline one article with which I have been involved that I have not demonstrably and qualitatively improved according to Wikipedia standards. Singing my own graces: I am not just a scholar I am an advanced practitioner. Some unsolicited sagely advice: Watch your toes!
That said, I value and appreciate your work on authenticating Wikipedia.
Phet
B9 hummingbird hovering (talk • contribs) 23:59, 19 December 2007 (UTC)