Jump to content

User talk:GlassFET

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GlassFET (talk | contribs) at 00:10, 20 December 2007 (please do not edit war over my talk page). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello GlassFET! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing!  Netsnipe  ►  16:30, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Note

I clear items from my talk page after I've read them. Removal of the item means that I've read it, whether or not I reply to it. GlassFET 17:41, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article to check

GlassFET, can you check the article on Rick Warren? It is a mess of blog sources and unsourced content, and it reads more like a hit piece than a biography. I'd like to get it fixed, but I'm not sure where to begin.--Lyonscc (talk) 17:03, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While you're at it, the article on Brian McLaren seems to be in similar straits. I'm not sure what it is with folks needing to make wikipedia their place for grinding axes against religious leaders.--Lyonscc (talk) 20:16, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GlassFET

Stop being [personal attack removed] and telling me what to do! [Personal attack removed]. I am neither your child nor your ward - nor your subordinate for that matter. If you treat other editors with disrespect, as you have treated me, [personal attack removed]. Your assertions about my editing is [personal attack removed]. Before you deride me or my contributions to Wikipedia again have an EXTENDED investigation of my editing history: not a cosmetic, surface inquiry. Please demonstrate your assertion about "Original Research" or "POV". Those allegations are false and empty. I have demonstrated my knowledge and skill on Wikipedia. I challenge you to outline one article with which I have been involved that I have not demonstrably and qualitatively improved according to Wikipedia standards. Singing my own graces: I am not just a scholar I am an advanced practitioner. Some unsolicited sagely advice: Watch your toes!

That said, I value and appreciate your work on authenticating Wikipedia.
Phet
B9 hummingbird hovering (talkcontribs) 23:59, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]