User talk:Welovekes

Notability of Jaqee

A tag has been placed on Jaqee, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Stwalkerster talk 18:19, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

You have recently edited the article Britney Spears' fifth studio album. These type of edits are unconstructive and unencyclopedic. Please refrain from making these edits before you are blocked from editing. Zchris87v 04:07, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion

A tag has been placed on Taff (ProSieben), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Grassfire 18:36, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oct 2007

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Britney Spears page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. NawlinWiki 17:23, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

if you mean the short text i added to the main britney spears article , it's true.

See Wikipedia:Verifiability. NawlinWiki 17:30, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't believe me , go to www.aftonbladet.se/klick and get it confirmed

WHY THE HELL WAS MY ARTICLE ABOUT JAQEE DELETED????!???

I put so much work in that article and it only took a few kb of space or so, and all you do is delete it. You didn't even tell what was wrong about the article- cos there was nothing wrong. You just think you're the smartest people in da world but ur NOT- N, O, T. And same about my article about taff!! I mean if I can't even write my article without it being deleted in the first 24 h how can it ever become more than a stub? That's a dirty and cowardly tactique. It is! And the Harry Potter fact that I changed, from 11 mio. to 20 mio +, of course it's 20 million I mean I guess it's been more than 24 h since the book was released you at Wikipedia should be smart enough to know at least THAT!... SHAME ON YOU WIKIPEDIA , 4 EVA!! You don't even give people a chance to share their knowledge! And the slogan, "The encyclopedia that anyone can edit" is just an old trick to make people think positive about this whole thing! Pull yourselves together @ wiki!!!

See WP:NOTE. And WP:UNDEL. --Yamla (talk) 17:39, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jaqee

A tag has been placed on Jaqee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 19:44, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Trierer.blogg.se

A tag has been placed on Trierer.blogg.se, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jack THE Pumpkin KING 19:58, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Ciara. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 17:24, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Blackout (Britney Spears album)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Blackout (Britney Spears album), is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - eo (talk) 19:24, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible for me to write a new article about Jaqee?

Would it be possible to do that? That article is protected from recreation, could you please undo that? I would add sources and links. Thank You!!! Der Trierer (talk) 17:22, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have a long history of vandalism and spam and have ignored repeated warnings. You have now been blocked indefinitely, until you can convince an administrator that you will refrain from all such edits in the future. --Yamla (talk) 20:55, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked - My apologies

I asure you that I have no intentions of vandalising this webpage whatsoever. I fail to see the full purpose in this blocking. I understand that there may be possible reasons, but I assure you that from now on I will be very serious about this. And if you review articles like the one about Trier (German city) I made contributions to it that were later removed for unknown reasons. The article about Jaqee was unfinished, I had no time to finish it quickly, and you removed it. I wanted the article to be a "good one", but you unfortunately gave me no chance to make it so. When I deleted the article about Britney Spears, it was not done intentionally. I had intended to add a text to the article, but instead of deleting one specific section and replacing it by another, I deleted the entire article. I am sorry for the trouble. Also, when I requested that I write a new article about Jaqee, I was given no response, I did not know how to apply properly since I have only limited knowledge of the guidelines of wikipedia and how they work. I added my Url 2 (or 3) times to the Britney Spears article. I know now that it was wrong to do such a thing since it was unencyclopedic and irrelevant as a contribution to the article, and later I read the Wiki- policy again, and as I intended to remove the Url, it was already deleted. I also have received an info text about deleting the discussion section (Britney Spears album), which I considered irrelevant as it contained false, unverified and irrelevant data. I would very much like to keep my account here on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, and I apologize for the trouble I may have caused. Best regards and a merry Christmas, Der Trierer (talk) 17:40, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]