User talk:I love entei
Hello, if you need to leave a message, I ask of only two things.
- Remember to sign your message. Failure to do so, may result in no response. You can sign messages by typing in (~~~~)
- Leave new messages at the bottom of this page.
(I love entei (talk) 03:46, 15 December 2007 (UTC))
Double redirect on macrocytic anaemia
Was due to me trying to direct the English to the American spelling, and doing the spelling the same way twice. Please let me know if not fixed, now. SBHarris 04:08, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Swivel Sweeper.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Swivel Sweeper.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 15:03, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Perfection Vacuum Cleaner
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Perfection Vacuum Cleaner, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Perfection Vacuum Cleaner. WODUP 17:43, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Why did you place the speedy deletion notice on the Joan Perez de Lazarraga article? Lazarraga is a major figure in the history of Basque literature, as is stated in the article. Madler 04:31, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- You haven't answered my question. Why did you put the tag on the article? Madler 04:39, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- If you tagged it because it was a poor article, lacked information, and had broken links, why was the reason for the tag stated as being that the article lacked any indication of the importance of the topic? Madler 04:45, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- Did you read the third sentence? I'll quote it for you: "As a writer, he was one of the only Renaissance authors in Basque-language literature, together with Bernard Etxepare." How about the sixth sentence? "It is one of the only Basque-language texts which has reached us from the 16th century, and the oldest from the southern Basque Country." This doesn't give you an indication of the importance of the subject? The reason I'm asking is because what you did looks pretty malicious, like a kind of vandalism, and I'm considering reporting you if you can't explain why those two sentences were not enough to communicate to you the importance of the subject. If I hadn't been around to catch you on this, the article might've been deleted. Madler 04:51, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- If you tagged it because it was a poor article, lacked information, and had broken links, why was the reason for the tag stated as being that the article lacked any indication of the importance of the topic? Madler 04:45, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
AFD Notification
AfD nomination of Black & Decker Pivot Vacuum
An article that you have been involved in editing, Black & Decker Pivot Vacuum, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black & Decker Pivot Vacuum. Thank you. Pharmboy (talk) 13:41, 23 December 2007 (UTC)