Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 January 4
Appearance
January 4
- Per user request as my brother, Elvir, wants the picture of himself taken off immediately. --Radoncic (talk) 00:25, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- DrPepperJo (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- OR UE I found that there are very many better photos of Lewis Hamilton and therefore want it to be deleted!
- Pietervhuis (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- CV Possibly unfree image. Strothra (talk) 01:23, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Pietervhuis (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- CV Possibly unfree image. Strothra (talk) 01:28, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Pietervhuis (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- CV Possibly unfree image. Strothra (talk) 01:42, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Pietervhuis (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- CV Possibly unfree image. Strothra (talk) 01:42, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- DeleteYou may delete this one. - PietervHuis 04:02, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Pietervhuis (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- CV Possibly unfree image. Strothra (talk) 01:42, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. This image is from Kavkaz Center, a rebel website with the same ideologie as Bin Laden's. Using images from Kavkaz Center was never met with problems (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Shamil6.jpg like stated here). It's only used to show important key figures and important events. The same goes for the images below from Kavkaz Center. - PietervHuis 13:35, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Pietervhuis (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- CV Possibly unfree image. Strothra (talk) 01:42, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Pietervhuis (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- CV Possibly unfree image. Strothra (talk) 01:42, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Pietervhuis (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- CV Possibly unfree image. Uploader claims permission was given, but there is no proof nor is any source info given. Strothra (talk) 01:42, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. I've updated the source. I have proof that permission was given (an e-mail) but I don't really know how to show it. - PietervHuis 03:38, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Please follow the instructions at WP:COPYREQ. The most important part is forwarding the email to permissions@wikimedia.org. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:59, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Pietervhuis (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- CV Possibly unfree image. Strothra (talk) 01:42, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Pietervhuis (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- CV Possibly unfree image. Note that this is a copy of Image:Shamilbasayev.jpg that is already listed as fair use. Strothra (talk) 01:42, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Pietervhuis (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- CV Possibly unfree image. Strothra (talk) 01:42, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Pietervhuis (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- CV Possibly unfree image. Strothra (talk) 01:42, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. This image is from the Russian Wikipedia. However, I couldn't use the image from the russian Wikipedia right away, so I had to upload it again to the English Wikipedia. - PietervHuis 15:28, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- I deleted it because it's already on commons at Image:Могила Анны Политковской.JPG - no need to have a separate copy on english wikipedia. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:01, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Uploader removed PD-self unexplained but used the image page like an article. Jusjih (talk) 03:49, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Unused image, terrible quality --Icarus (Hi!) 06:13, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Same as above: unused, terrible quality --Icarus (Hi!) 06:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - That's fine, seeing as a better replacement was found. Mshake3 (talk) 16:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- This image is a picture of the creator and his brother, used on an article about himself which is currently up for speedy deletion. Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 08:24, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- On the one hand, it overwrote an image of the same title. On the other, I don't think that image was used anywhere. Go ahead and delete, especially since the uploader of the new image has been indefinitely blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 21:42, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphan: This is an instrumental recording of "O Canada", which appears to have been copied from Spanish Wikipedia by a bot. The image's page lists Emijrpbot as the uploader, but no such user account exists here. The file is unused on English Wikipedia, and there are already several recordings of "O Canada" on English Wikipedia, both vocal and instrumental (see O Canada). —Ka-Ping Yee (talk) 11:34, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Interrobang² (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- The description is wrong, it is too small to be used for any good, and it is being used on one page, out of context. 88.110.122.176 (talk) 15:56, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- This was uploaded with a GFDL license, but is clearly a screenshot of a copyrighted TV show, with a caption below it. Phirazo 18:07, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- This was uploaded with a GFDL license, but is clearly a screenshot of a copyrighted TV show, with a caption below it. Phirazo 19:03, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Musical overdose (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, unencyclopedic Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 21:14, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep What does orphaned mean? and why is it unencyclopedic? It shows who he is and I've got emailed permission from him to use it. Otherwise what would you suggest be put in its place? Musical overdose (talk) 16:29, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- probably originally for userpage, now Orphaned and Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:32, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, likely copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:48, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:51, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- SOy_OSKuRiToHeh (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, no description to tell where this is. Anyone have more information about this photo? Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Never mind, it's Querétaro - I withdraw the deletion request and will mark as move to commons. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:58, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (likely the logo of the uploader's restaurant [whose article was deleted]) Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:06, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Finalseraphim (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- appears to be a non-free screenshot Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:14, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Quadarockz (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:15, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:17, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, and no sources for any of the component images Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:25, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:26, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:29, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Funhistory (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- admitted copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:32, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep--I created this image--it's entirely my own work--but it's based on the official seating chart published by Cirque du Soleil. I don't believe it's a copyright violation because it's only a scaled-down version of the original for purposes of discussion on the Quidam page to clarify the differences between their published chart, & what people attending the show can actually expect. My understanding is that this is not a copyright violation, & I don't know where you see an "admission" of a "copyvio".--Funhistory (talk) 02:08, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Biglobiglo (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- derivative work of mural, and UK FOP does not apply to murals[1] Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:34, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:36, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:39, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:39, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:39, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Ue Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:40, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Sean_gorter (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:41, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:41, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Clipperton (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:48, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, not enough info in description to determine encyclopedic use Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:51, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Kiwiaussiemike (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, not enough info to determine encyclopedic use Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:52, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, derivative work of copyrighted image Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:56, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- HouseOfScandal (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, claimed "non-copyright" because a press release, but that's highly doubtful Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:58, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Several pictures included in the overall one are clear copyright violations (e.g.: Brancusi, Hagi, Comaneci). Dahn (talk) 00:02, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. The image is author's own work, it's obvious it's not violating nothing Adrianzax (talk) 10:18, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Do you mean you took the photos of Brancusi, Hagi and Comăneci? If you didn't, then it's a derived work and yes, that means it's a copyright violation bogdan (talk) 11:35, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- The authors of the original pictures with Brancusi and Comaneci are dead or not requesting any kind of copyright for their pictures. Adrianzax (talk) 11:55, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Unless the authors license the images under a license compatible with Wikipedia, you are not supposed to use them. see Wikipedia:Image use policy. BTW, just because the author is dead doesn't mean you can use their works as you please. Let me remind you that copyright lasts for 70 years after the death of the author. bogdan (talk) 12:05, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- The 2 pictures from the colage you're talking about are a derived work from the original. The image as a whole is my own work . The authors of the original these 2 pictures are either dead or not requesting license for their work. Adrianzax (talk) 12:20, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Unless the authors license the images under a license compatible with Wikipedia, you are not supposed to use them. see Wikipedia:Image use policy. BTW, just because the author is dead doesn't mean you can use their works as you please. Let me remind you that copyright lasts for 70 years after the death of the author. bogdan (talk) 12:05, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- The authors of the original pictures with Brancusi and Comaneci are dead or not requesting any kind of copyright for their pictures. Adrianzax (talk) 11:55, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. The authors of the original pictures are dead for more than 50 years and any copyright claim is irrelevant.Mario1987 (talk) 13:37, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Gheorghe Hagi is only 42 years old. He would have been around -8 years when the photographer died. bogdan (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- The picture of Gheorghe Hagi is not disputed for licensing, this picture dosn't exist in the web and no one can claim the licensing because it's made by me or my friends. Adrianzax (talk) 13:56, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- The photo of Năstase is from some random website: http://www.americatoday.com/sports/tennis/nastase.jpg bogdan (talk) 14:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- And they have licensed this picture or they require their aproval for using the picture? NO... Adrianzax (talk) 14:56, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Adrianzax, even that site has a clear copyright notice at the bottom of the screen. Dahn (talk) 15:18, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- And they have licensed this picture or they require their aproval for using the picture? NO... Adrianzax (talk) 14:56, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- The photo of Năstase is from some random website: http://www.americatoday.com/sports/tennis/nastase.jpg bogdan (talk) 14:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- As there's no doubt that the image is a copyright violation, I deleted it. See: Wikipedia:Speedy deletions#G12 bogdan (talk) 16:25, 5 January 2008 (UTC)