Jump to content

User talk:82.185.106.178

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 82.185.106.178 (talk) at 12:34, 21 January 2008 (→‎Reasoning). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please do not constantly revert as you did on the Iron Maiden article. This is your warning before you are reported. You cannot use the fact that you may have the LP as a citation. It is not a reliable source. If you require any help on how to use Wikipedia please do not hesitate to contact me. ScarianCall me Pat 16:26, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.

Please do not gratuitously remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 156.34.142.110 (talk) 13:26, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Iron Maiden, you will be blocked from editing. ScarianCall me Pat 11:19, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Iron Maiden, you will be blocked from editing. -- Casmith_789 (talk) 16:28, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Your recent edit to Iron Maiden (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses/phone numbers or Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr or related links to a non-talk page. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II (talk) 07:44, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Iron Maiden (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses/phone numbers or Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr or related links to a non-talk page. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II (talk) 07:46, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reasoning

Because you're removing information without properly citing why. You've been warned about it before. Any edit deemed unconstructive (by consensus) is considered vandalism, to some degree. Please discuss major changes like that on the article's talk page first, please. Thank you. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to ask me. ScarianCall me Pat 17:00, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Gwernol 15:25, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gwernol 15:25, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 1 week from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

slakrtalk / 10:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

82.185.106.178 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

How can I be blocked just one second after an edit? You are blocking me just because it's me, not because of my behaviour

Decline reason:

IP consistently used for disruption. – Luna Santin (talk) 10:45, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

82.185.106.178 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The question has not been answered: how can an administrator (1) see that I made an edit somewhere on Wikipedia, (2) read it, (3) judge it to be vandalism, and (4) block me in just one second after my edit??? This is not serious

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=The question has not been answered: how can an administrator (1) see that I made an edit somewhere on Wikipedia, (2) read it, (3) judge it to be vandalism, and (4) block me in just one second after my edit??? This is not serious |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=The question has not been answered: how can an administrator (1) see that I made an edit somewhere on Wikipedia, (2) read it, (3) judge it to be vandalism, and (4) block me in just one second after my edit??? This is not serious |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=The question has not been answered: how can an administrator (1) see that I made an edit somewhere on Wikipedia, (2) read it, (3) judge it to be vandalism, and (4) block me in just one second after my edit??? This is not serious |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}