Jump to content

Talk:BBC News Online

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 82.32.52.223 (talk) at 06:50, 2 February 2008 (→‎Problem: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconBBC Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Merger

I was thinking that the content of BBC News Magazine Monitor could be slimmed down and merged into this article, since a lot of the current content could be considered superfluous and the rest could fit in quite easily within this article. Wikiwoohoo 15:55, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just done it. Hope people like it. Wikiwoohoo 21:05, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

10 years

Today, 22 October, the oldest news article still available directly on BBC News Online is ten years old.

To celebrate I and several others are tying to get it onto today's most read list. So please could you and all your friends and colleagues read http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/14310.stm Thryduulf 12:24, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oldest page

See http://www.bbc.co.uk/politics97

This news sub-section of the BBC site could be the oldest news page available. It still has the old BBC logo! --Jorvik 16:19, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Banners?

I'm looking at BBC.co.uk (international version) right now but I can't see a single banner! When were they supposed to be implemented?82.99.21.74 (talk) 11:49, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Forum

The paragraph regarding the ease of manipulation of rankings, in particular the sentence "It's obvious......nowhere" is IMHO very subjective. Is there any evidence of this which can be cited?

--Yendor1958 (talk) 06:56, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problem

According to this they got RSS 0.91 feeds in 2003 and then upgraded to 2.0 in 2000. This appears to be a clear error. PS- If I find the correct info I will add it --82.32.52.223 (talk) 06:50, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]