Jump to content

User talk:81.86.218.6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RaspK FOG (talk | contribs) at 12:30, 9 February 2008 (On the matter of censorship and the supposed lack of sexual images.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Talk:Muhammad. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Resolute 22:44, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Muhammad/FAQ. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dreaded Walrus t c 12:02, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
For that matter, I can provide you with a number of examples on coitus, most particularly anal sex, which has a multitude of such images - the need for variety we provided in the FAQ dictated that we do not emphasize one subject only, but make it apparent that numerous different images of varrying "intensity" can be found here.
The only reason there's next to know image of mutilated corpses is the lack of such relevance - we 'don't have' any real photographs of impaled humans, so we don't have any impaled human photos (there is one such photo from "Cannibal Holocaust" - one can easily and should put this up in the relevant article, if he does it correctly). — RaspK FOG (talk) 12:30, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]