User talk:Ammar shaker
 Archives | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Behind the names
Thank you Ammar for your comment.
In fact I do not see that you got my purpose behind the spelling of the name Juddah. It has been forty years I am researching what the Modern Hebrew has slaughtered in our history as distorted facts. The name of Juddah is only one of my many clues and targets. The Bible scholars write history like they want but they still have a European tongue and that is what I am after: the Modern Hebrew is hiding behind its pronunciation to avoid understanding Arabia. Salomon's Kingdom, no one knows its location with evidence (look out!!), split in two after his death: Judah in the South and Israel in the North. Historians do not say in the North of what or the South of what and it is not logical that it could be Palestine or part of it to be close to each-other. These two kingdoms were far apart. And when they talk about King Josiah "the King of Judah", they confuse the city with the Southern Kingdom. Maybe they are not the same. The problem is among the Bible scholars because they are confused and confusing. The story about Josiah tells exactly who Josiah's parents are: Jedidah and Amon, and yet the real pronunciation is a mystery unless we go to the living language: Arabic. And the story of "Micah's idols" talks about the same Judah. I am certain that it is about the city of Juddah because the harbor city of Laith is involved in these stories.
The conclusion is that Arabia was the capital of wealth and trade and production in the distant past where the Israelites were living as Arabians among Arabs. Every time a foreign invader launched a campaign against the Israelites he deported the main figures in the Arabian society: the rabbis and the rich people, not the entire Israelite population. The proof lies in the story of Josiah who was released by Shalmanassar III the King of Assyria, and returned to Juddah as a king. That was around 695 BC. In other words, the Israelite community used to live in Arabia and their Kingdom was in Arabia until they lost their power and dissolved in the Arabian society who spoke their language. Yes, I propose that Hebrew is the Old Arabic. It evolved through the ages and continued to beautify and crystallize with poetry and Oral tradition until it was different from the shape it had taken in the Israelite temples and scrolls: grammar and pronunciation. The proof is that the Jews at the time of the Prophet spoke Arabic and had purely Arabic names. Bani Kuraydhah, bani Kainukaa', bani Al-Nadir: this is pure Arabic. Hebrew was in the scrolls only.
Please read my proposals about the name of Makkah whose name changed through the ages according to the Rabbis using the Kaabah as a temple: from Beit El, to Hebron to Makkah on the hands of "Micah" whose name should be pronounced Makkah. The Ashkenazi Jews have a European tongue and they are European Slavic, they are not Semites and do not have rights for any claims in Palestine or any where in the Arabian geography. I know that this could mean politics but we cannot talk Bible without touching the modern political landscape of the Region. Very respectfully, Noureddine (talk) 22:58, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Battle of Ramillies
Hi - reply to your queation on the Battle of Ramillies on that talk page. Guthrum (talk) 21:37, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Askeriye
Bana Suudi Askeriyenin yönetim hakkinda bilgi lagzim, yardim edebilirmisin?--91.7.232.122 (talk) 23:33, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! TomStar81 (Talk) 01:21, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)
The January 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:01, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CBAcollegeLogo.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:CBAcollegeLogo.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:10, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Spelling and grammar check
I am honored that you asked. Please look over the changes that I made to User:Ammar shaker/Nuclear-tests1, and let me know if you have questions about any of them. Chris the speller (talk) 16:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
- Leave a note on my user page any time you would like some help. Chris the speller (talk) 17:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Riyadh
المشكلة يا صديقي أني لا أملك المصادر الكافية لتطوير المقالة إلى الحد الذي تطمح إليه. لكن اصبر علي الأسبوع هذا وبعدين إن شاء الله أساهم معك قدر الإمكان. -- Slacker (talk) 18:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Cut and paste moves
Whatever your intentions are, don't cut and paste to move articles. When you do so it breaks the history of the article, and the history of the article needs to be retained for licensing issues. Read WP:CPMV on how fix them and move them properly. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 16:27, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Effatcollegelogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Effatcollegelogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:24, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The February 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates. Please vote here by February 28! --Eurocopter tigre (talk) 12:06, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
السعودية
السلام
قلتم انكم سوف الحب ليكون لي في السعودية ويكي المشروع!
☆ Muzammil, مزمل ☆ (talk) 18:12, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Unification
You're in luck. I happen to be reading a book on that subject at the moment, so I'll start adding sections gradually in a few days. -- Slacker (talk) 16:26, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
message
Sorry, I meant to say: You said you would like to invite me into the Saudi Wiki Project. And the other thing is I'm so shocked at the Riyadh article, how much it has improved and the information is perfect.☆ Muzammil, مزمل ☆ (talk) 16:44, 21 February 2008 (UTC)