User talk:82.42.237.84

/Archive1

February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:48, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Chrysler PT Cruiser constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 22:27, 28 February 2008 (UTC))

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

82.42.237.84 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not "Solumerias/SunStar Net vandal" whoever they are, I am a different individual. I was only editing constructively.

Decline reason:

Police Camera Action, RFPP - duck test says no. ~ Riana ⁂ 11:14, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

82.42.237.84 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Well, I am not that individual. I edited different stuff too. Just because of what I edit does not mean I am a specific individual on Wikipedia, I'm a different person.

Decline reason:

That's not more persuasive than the above request. — Sandstein (talk) 11:19, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

82.42.237.84 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

OK, let me explain things to you. I am most definitely not the "Solumerias/SunStar Net vandal", I am a far more constructive editor than them... I edit different areas - and anyway, if any admin is reading this, he has lost interest in anything wiki-related (I know him away from Wikipedia). I want to edit peacefully and I only want to be helpful, not unhelpful. As regards the above user, well, if he's kicked the habit of Wikipedia, surely that's a good thing??

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=OK, let me explain things to you. I am most definitely not the "Solumerias/SunStar Net vandal", I am a far more constructive editor than them... I edit different areas - and anyway, if any admin is reading this, he has lost interest in anything wiki-related (I know him away from Wikipedia). I want to edit peacefully and I only want to be helpful, not unhelpful. As regards the above user, well, if he's kicked the habit of Wikipedia, surely that's a good thing?? |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=OK, let me explain things to you. I am most definitely not the "Solumerias/SunStar Net vandal", I am a far more constructive editor than them... I edit different areas - and anyway, if any admin is reading this, he has lost interest in anything wiki-related (I know him away from Wikipedia). I want to edit peacefully and I only want to be helpful, not unhelpful. As regards the above user, well, if he's kicked the habit of Wikipedia, surely that's a good thing?? |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=OK, let me explain things to you. I am most definitely not the "Solumerias/SunStar Net vandal", I am a far more constructive editor than them... I edit different areas - and anyway, if any admin is reading this, he has lost interest in anything wiki-related (I know him away from Wikipedia). I want to edit peacefully and I only want to be helpful, not unhelpful. As regards the above user, well, if he's kicked the habit of Wikipedia, surely that's a good thing?? |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

---