User talk:Causa sui
| This is Causa sui's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 |
Please read these policies before posting.
- Always sign your messages with --~~~~. Please do not post if you are not going to do this.
- Please do not respond to other people's messages here. This has the effect of spilling disputes from other pages onto my talk page, and it is very distracting for me. This talk page is for messages to me, not to the other people who have written here.
- Please create a new heading for new subjects. To respond to a message under the same subject, find the applicable heading below, press the "Edit" button on the right, and add your message to that section.
- Responses will go to your talk page.
Click here to leave me a new message. Also, remember to always sign your messages with --~~~~
- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.
| Request name | Motions | Case | Posted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amendment request: Article titles and capitalisation | none | (orig. case) | 7 June 2024 |
| Clarification request: mentioning the name of off-wiki threads | none | none | 4 June 2024 |
| Amendment request: India-Pakistan | none | (orig. case) | 27 June 2024 |
| Clarification request: Contentious topics restrictions | none | none | 10 June 2024 |
| Amendment request: World War II and the history of Jews in Poland | Motion | (orig. case) | 21 June 2024 |
No arbitrator motions are currently open.
Leonidas I
Yes sir, I apoligize I was just testing it out. I had no idea of the "Sandbox." I love history trust me I have been getting A's in history class. I just did some more editing to Leonidas I today. I was serious this time, adding stuff I found necessary to add. Check it out and please let me know if you like it. If you would like to talk about history email me, i love history, "Williamkid123@yahoo.com"
Richard Gaiser
Why did you delete the page? All of it was true. We have had to go back and redo his page 3 times now. It is getting very frustrating. We are simply trying to add honest promotion for our band and you are deleting our pages.
--Evan
A discussion is happening right now on the fate of UFC 84. Because the outcome of this discussion could affect other MMA event pages and how/when they are created, your input would be greatly appreciated. The discussion is happening here. Thank you for your assistance! Gromlakh (talk) 17:48, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Indiana, right?
 WikiProject Indianapolis |
An invitation to join us! | |
| Your recent edits seem to indicate that you have some local knowledge of Indianapolis. If so, perhaps you would like to join WikiProject Indianapolis, a project for the creation, expansion and improvement of articles related to metropolitan Indianapolis. Check out our project page, and if you like what you see, join us by adding your name to our membership list. Hope to see you at WikiProject Indianapolis! |
Are you a member of the project? If not, join us! Cheers, Basketball110 Clinton, Obama, McCain, Huckabee, Romney, or Paul? 02:23, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello,
In this diff dating april 2005, you have added a game Carlsen-Ernst with annotations from Carlsen. However, the source is not clearly mentioned, nor the fact that Carlsen allowed this contents to be published here, and under which licence.
Could you be kind enough to clarify the source of the comments and mention an authorization and licence ? Thank you. Mro en (talk) 17:37, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Weasel
Hi, you redirected the Weasel-inline Template to Template:Who. This caused a problem for those articles that reference the Template:Weal, which is itself a redirection to Weasel-inline. Wikipedia does not resolve the double redirection correctly. --The very model of a minor general (talk) 12:32, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you, and see 'ya
Belated note for you on my talk page. 69.60.114.162 (talk) 15:11, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
article on EU Microsoft case
[1] Corporate whitewashing? On whose part? I see no pressing need to include this aspect of reaction to the decision, but your summary confuses me. Also the section summarized the position in the sources, it wasn't editorializing. It was reportage. 86.44.6.14 (talk) 16:58, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Why exactly would we confine our talk on article content to article talk pages? 86.44.6.14 (talk) 04:04, 10 March 2008 (UTC)