Jump to content

Talk:Consumer bankruptcy in Canada

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 167.1.143.100 (talk) at 12:09, 20 March 2008. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconLaw Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCanada: Law Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian law.

TITLES

YOU DO NOT NEED TO WRITE THE TITLES IN CAPITALS! talk to symode09's or Spread the love! 04:53, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

I am not versed in Canadian law but I can give some pointers as this article is on the WikiProject:Law page.

  • The article has no head. The overview pahaps could be moved to the head?
  • More links would be nice. More Blue! There are none, could be well over 100. Consumer, Bankrupcy (general), federal and provincial in the first line all have articles on wikipedia.
  • (Unless this is different in Canada) Use legal citation. referencing using [1]

Overall the article is great. This criticism is intended to be helpful :-) Bamkin 15:24, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ Footnotes

Chapter References in Parentheses

I find a good deal of this article to be unclear. In the first place I do not know what the chapter references listed after many bulleted points are referring to. There are several instances of either missing words or misplaced commas. As well, the language used is not altogether approachable to someone not well versed in Canadian law. The quality ratings above are pretty accurate; a good start, but needs some work.