Jump to content

User talk:Pax:Vobiscum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tom.mevlie (talk | contribs) at 09:02, 25 March 2008 (Sorry: who is sorry?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please vote!

Hi! Please join us here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lianga13#Bingo.21

Thank so much!

Angelo De La Paz (talk) 12:52, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption

I am currnetly in year 11 studying Ancient and modern Histories, it would be great if you could adopt me, because we both seem to share a like for ancient history. Contact me at my talk page. Thankyou. --Tom.mevlie (talk) 12:32, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are the first reply i have gotten from any one i have sent an adoption message to, i am not entirely sure how this works, but i would be overjoyed if you were to adopt me. Thanks Tom.mevlie (talk) 23:38, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Templates

I was wondering how to create a template for my page, you know, most of the other projects have a banner that allows articles to be grouped into the project, how would i go about doing that? Thanks.Tom.mevlie (talk) 23:59, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Anemospilia

It seems we both tried to improve the same article, what a coincidence, almost like fate. I really need help recruiting more users though, thanks. Tom.mevlie (talk) 02:36, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re suspected socks

Have you looked at User:DangerTM? You may want to review my comments at User talk:John Carter#Take_a_look_at_this_user. I don't want to assume bad faith, I've never run into a sock before; but this user's edits looked very suspicious and I noticed that you are tracking a puppetmaster with related edits.--Doug.(talk contribs) 19:01, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

John suggested I tag the user's page as suspected, so I did. He also noted an apparent consistency in not capitalizing the word "i" which I hadn't noticed. Let me know if there is anything further I can do to help.--Doug.(talk contribs) 19:19, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I definitely think you are right, just compare the two user pages, very similar layout and membership of the same wikiprojects basically. It is also not that common to find sigs on user pages. But if he hasn't been doing anything disruptive with that account (I just had a quick look at his contribs and there seem to be some good edits), perhaps it is better to just block the old accounts and wait and see. Especially considering that getting a clean start is one of the allowed reasons for creating a new account. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 20:49, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This seems like a good way to proceed - if the user is the same he does appear keen and open to guidance. If he is the same give the chap a chance to reform. If he isn't the same then leave the guy to prove themselves by their track record. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 14:51, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Shell

I supported keeping this article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Shell (3rd nomination) because I could find at least 4 reliable, third-party articles on an MSN search. Wikipedia:Verifiability did not apply there because "If no reliable, third-party sources can be found for an article topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it...." did not apply. I was caught in an edit conflict as the debate was closed, at which time I wanted to add in that the real issue was notability, not verifiability. I had come to the conclusion, about 60 seconds too late, that Tim Shell is just not notable, ironically enough. So I can live with the consensus to delete. Bearian (talk) 15:41, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption

Hello,

I am searching someone for help. I am a german wikipedian and I try to translate some german articles into english. It is the first time since 35 years I write this language and I need someone to control style and grammar in my translations.

My interests: sacred music, classical music.

I play recorder. I sing soprano.

My languages:

  • German
  • Latin
  • French
  • English

Kind regards

--Gedackt (talk) 07:09, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and welcome to the english wikipedia! I'd be happy to adopt you and look over your contributions. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 15:09, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for helping! Funny: German organist. In German we write: deutscher Organist! I must search the grammer of my children... They are leaving home now and cooking alone is not all for me, but I love it. I love organ music too. Special modern organ music from improviser. You heard Wolfgang Seifen? I studied myself a little bit music history. I want to translate some of the german articles of international interest. Starting with biographies. That is easier for beginning. A question for typo: You made ==Title. In german WP we write: == Title (with space). Is there a standard?
Do you watch my edits?
Kind regards
--Gedackt (talk) 17:33, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it matters if you use spaces in the titles or not. The automatic layout script I use prefer not to have spaces, but I don't think it matters. I'd be happy tol continue to go over your edits if you want me to. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 21:01, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New article

New difficult article: Church musician (Germany). Partiturspiel. What is the correct term in english? score playing??--Gedackt (talk) 17:44, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think score reading would be the best translation. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 03:20, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

For what it is worth, I have a suspicion that new user WilliamMThompson (talk · contribs) is the sockpuppet of Tom.mevlie (talk · contribs) that you identified. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 16:28, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I second that. Howa0082 (talk) 17:15, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I totally agree, but since he isn't being very disruptive at the moment I would suggest waiting with blocking (he'd just return with another account). Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 17:56, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Hey sorry about that man, I thought that implications were well within my rights, but I guess I was wrong. Does that fall under the category of slander or what? Just for future reference.WilliamMThompson (talk) 22:08, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hellp Pax. I wonder. I thought there was supposed to be a certain sense of comradery between adopter and adoptee. MAYBE I WAS WRONG. maybe i wasn't. I did break the rules a bit. just a lot. But I see you are hot on the case of another. WILL THOMPSON. I might have to pay hm a little visit. I don't blame you. I blame myself. But that kid has stealing from me.