User talk:200.214.44.134

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Celine Dion, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--Urban Rose 21:16, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of picture from Celine Dion

Hi. If you are going to remove that picture from the article, please explain why in detail. Your edits have been reverted for the time being. Thanks.--Urban Rose 21:29, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've let it known on WP:AN that you have concerns over that image. You should consider go there and explaining yourself before removing the picture again because I'm still not sure why you're removing the image. Thank you.--Urban Rose 21:42, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

200.214.44.134 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

SEE BELLOW

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is a collaborative project. That means that when others disagree with you, you should pause and discuss the disagreement. I looked at your contributions, and couldn't find any edits to Talk:Celine Dion, and your edit summaries are not very clear about what your reasoning was. Also, in general, ignoring warnings will result in a block. Also, edit-warring is always against the rules, even when you are sure that you are right. When your block expires, if you still think that picture should be removed, seek consensus on the talk page instead of just removing it, especially now that you know that some other editors don't agree with you. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:58, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

200.214.44.134 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

PLZ BLOCK User:Kww AS WELL FOR 3RR AND EDIT-WARRING. THE WARNIGS WERE WRONG. NEVER SAID "FUCK" :'-(

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=<big>PLZ BLOCK [[User:Kww]] AS WELL FOR 3RR AND EDIT-WARRING. THE WARNIGS WERE WRONG. NEVER SAID "FUCK" :'-( </big>  |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=<big>PLZ BLOCK [[User:Kww]] AS WELL FOR 3RR AND EDIT-WARRING. THE WARNIGS WERE WRONG. NEVER SAID "FUCK" :'-( </big>  |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=<big>PLZ BLOCK [[User:Kww]] AS WELL FOR 3RR AND EDIT-WARRING. THE WARNIGS WERE WRONG. NEVER SAID "FUCK" :'-( </big>  |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

User:Kww SAID:

"Edit summaries that consist of the word "FUCK" repeated twenty times are never good faith"[1]

IF YOU CAN'T TELL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN "FUCK" AND Wikipedia:FUC, REFRAIN FROM EDITING IMAGES!

Rationale for including image

See Wikipedia:Fair use review for an explanation of why the image is included in the article.--Urban Rose 21:52, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NOTHING FOUND :'-(

I'm not an expert on the subject. You may consider, reading a recent thread on WP:AN about what happened. And by the way, I think that what User:Kww did was inappropriate, but you need to change your tone. Calling others "a joke" and using all caps is not appropriate either and will cause people not to take you seriously.--Urban Rose 21:59, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.