User talk:Puchiko

This is Puchiko's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2

Archives

September 2007-January 2008

Systematic Bias

I agree with you about this..It really was the point I was getting at. Especially on holidays when Raul knows more people will be at home on the internet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pensil (talk • contribs) 19:26, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome

Just wanted to say thank you for the warm welcome you left on my talk page, that was nice of you. The internet is not usually where I expect to find kindness, especially considering we kinda disagree. Thanks again. 24.14.119.135 (talk) 13:22, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Your thank you cheered me up, so thank you too. Puchiko (Talk-email) 13:37, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, your welcome did me too, so it was owed in kind. 24.14.119.135 (talk) 13:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your kind words. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.65.163.248 (talk) 07:19, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Careful, there

Assume Good Faith. ClueBot beat me to a vandal revert, and I was in the process of undoing my change (which reinstated a bad version) when you reverted my edit labeling it vandalism. Careful, there (and I'll follow my own advice, although what I did was an honest mistake using WP:TWINKLE. - Ageekgal (talk) 15:39, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, honest mistake on my part too. I'll use the non-vandal rollback feature in the future. Puchiko (Talk-email) 15:43, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

You have been granted with the rollback permission on the basis of your recent effort on dealing with vandalism. The rollback is a revert tool which can lessen the strains that normal javascripts such as twinkle put on the Wikipedia servers. You will find that you will revert faster through the rollback than through the normal reversion tools such as javascripts and the undo feature, because the rollback feature does not require fetching the data from the page history and then sending article data back to the Wikipedia server as the javascript requires, therefore you could save time especially when reverting very large articles such as the George W. Bush page. To use it, simply click the link which should look like [rollback] (which should appear unbolded if you have twinkle installed) on the lastest diff page. The rollback link will also appear on the history page beside the edit summary of the lastest edit. For more information, you may refer to this page, alternatively, you may also find this tutorial on rollback helpful.Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 19:29, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another vandalitic from 216.100.95.240

See, he did it again, does he need another warning?--Freewayguy (Meet) 00:59, 1 March 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Talk:Wikipedia

Then again, the fact that the Wikipedians have brought you into the fold even though you're 15 does support the opinion that they're paedophiles grooming adolescents. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.155.23.216 (talk) 18:53 4 March 2008

Replied on Talk:Wikipedia. Puchiko (Talk-email) 20:15, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another one! Frickin' ZOMG!

Thank you SO much for the RickK star. I think I might have to create a subpage to store them...

... Okay, so I only have four. Two One Six Five Five ^τ_ʃ 17:58, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image request

What image request? Badagnani (talk) 19:18, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re: Hard Candy

I've removed several fake and fan-made images from a lot of pop music articles, and this one is no exception. I appreciate that you've filled out the fair use rationale, however I still see no reliable source information. It just says "the cover art can or could be obtained from Warner Bros." What does that mean, exactly? Have they or Madonna's official website provided an official image? Unless you have an advanced copy and have scanned this yourself, where did you find it? - eo (talk) 20:38, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - if you add it in again I won't touch it - however the source is a blogspot, which is not technically a reliable source, so I can't guarantee that someone else may want it removed :-) But go for it! Thanks - eo (talk) 12:27, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I Am Sorry

Puchiko you issued my warning for the vandlization on Advance Wars Days of Ruin

I love that game but i do have mood swings so i was a bit bad at that time

please accept my heartfeld apology —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.171.73.96 (talk) 23:43, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you care?

Why do you care about what's on what page? Maybe people who create the stuff on here should be the ones to edit it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.10.181.41 (talk) 20:22, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied at User talk:168.10.181.41#Re:Why do you care?. Thanks. Puchiko (Talk-email) 21:13, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning removal

Hello Puchiko! Your recent edit removed some justified warnings from 166.109.110.20. Please be more careful when editing user talk pages. Thank you! AVand ^talk _contribs 13:38, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits on Abraham Lincoln

You are correct; rubbish per lots of page talk. Any mention is considered vandalism. Thanks for keeping eyes on. BusterD (talk) 14:24, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]