Talk:Biljana Srbljanović
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | Biography Start‑class | ||||||
|
![]() | Serbia Start‑class | |||||||||
|
Karadžić
Did't she deny that she is related to Radovan Karadžić? --BokicaK 20:42, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- But those links are weak evidence. And further http://blog.b92.net/arhiva/node/4543 --[[User:BokicaK|Bojan]] 17:06, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
- She didn't deny it there either. Nikola 08:08, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
No, she said that it is attempt at discreditation. We should add that she didn't explicitly deny Slobodna Dalmacija question. -- Bojan 05:58, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Quote reference
The reference put on the quote is wrong. The text is about BS as member of LDP, and there is no such quote in the whole text. Yo'd better find the text where she said this, or remove it.--Maduixa 07:50, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
E deco,tako se to radi
--'''Marko Radovanovic''' 20:08, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
This article is not neutral,but is biased against Srbljanovic.It contains opinions of the person who wrote it, which are superficial. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.66.187.154 (talk) 21:54, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:13, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
I also think this is biased
It is biased against Biljana. "Controversies" section isn't supposed to be longer then "Biography" section when we're talking about someone as successful as she is. Serbian version is done in way higher quality.
Obviously, somebody doesn't like what she's saying about Serbian society ;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.216.131.64 (talk) 17:16, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
I agree that this page is very biased against Biljana, so I would like to add the tag that at the start of the "controversies" section. Saigon from europe (talk) 22:42, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
WHAT?! The controversies section can be as long as it wants to be. That unsigned comment up top can think as much as it wants about successes and so forth, but when someone is controversial, despite their apparent successes (just as an aside, I never heard of her until she insulted Milan Gurovic), their controversies must be mentioned. In short, if her controversies are many, then they should be included. Not including them due to some delusional 'length of article' considerations is, well, delusional. This is a wiki article, it is not a a newspaper article where we have space issues, nor is it her personal campaign page. Accuracy, people! Ganseki (talk) 20:59, 9 April 2008 (UTC)