Jump to content

User talk:Jonny2x4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 74.12.216.229 (talk) at 02:15, 14 April 2008. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archives of my user talk page from the last two years.


Nash

Sorry for my stupid/arrogant behaviour during the discussion. I guess I was just too compulsive about this whole thing. You know the "rules" here much better than I do. The next time I'll pay more attention to your comments. Thanks, 1stLtLombardi 07:07, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maki Blood Type

I'll have to do some rechecking of it but Maki's blood type was in there based off FF2 last I checked. Not really a major issue, but the point of the reference was some fool was going around changing the bloodtypes, and a reference seemed to kill that.

Metal Gear Solid FAR

Metal Gear Solid has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.

Don't suppose if you recall if SFA3 MAX listed it in her bio by any chance...I'd actually have to rummage through the game for that again, though if it does that is at least a citable source no?

Oh, and wb.--Kung Fu Man 06:00, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would have to check the game right now to see, but I'm busy with other stuff. I'll check it later. Jonny2x4 07:26, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Message from a human!

Hi, Jonny. Sorry for clogging up your page with so many boilerplate template messages. I was going through the article List of classic Metal Gear characters, and tagging the images that didn't have a rationale. I was using a special tool, which meant that every time I tagged an image, an automatic message was sent to the person who had uploaded it. It so happened that an awful lot of images from that page (possibly all of them) had been uploaded by you, so that's how that happened. Apologies for any irritation. Cheers. ElinorD (talk) 13:32, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Jonny, please stop tagging Banderstiz's articles as nonsense. These are not cases of vandalism by any means, nor are these articles "patent nonsense". (Please read WP:CSD#G1 for a definition of the term.) These are articles that make a specific claim of notability, and are thus inappropriate for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Caknuck 18:25, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to say this, but you're wrong. All of his articles are filled with nothing but unsourced hoaxes passed off as legit subjects. There's no such things "Dragon Ball Plus", "Shadow Shonen" or even a new "Super Mario Bros." film. But you're right, I was using the wrong tag. I should've marked them as hoaxes. Jonny2x4 18:43, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That's a much more constructive way to resolve this. When I get a chance later tonight, I'll do some more digging and see if I can answer some of the concerns you have. In the meanwhile, you may want to ask for help from some of the people at WP:ANIME. If they can confirm this as a hoax, we can look towards getting these articles taken care of. Let me know if you have any further concerns. Cheers, Caknuck 23:06, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ninja Gaiden 2

I noticed that you were the one that tagged Ninja Gaiden II: The Dark Sword of Chaos as having a plot summary that was too long. I've done some work to try to rectify the problem, but I'm not sure I reduced it enough. Do you think the issues in the tag have been addressed? Larrythefunkyferret 07:56, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While I'm at it, I just noticed that you tagged Ninja Gaiden (NES) for having the same problem. Has that one been fixed? Larrythefunkyferret 08:01, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I still think they could use some further editing. IF you want to know how to write a good plot summary, simply take a look at Devil May Cry, Metal Gear Solid or other GA-class and FA-class video articles. They get to the meat of the plot without having to divulge every plot twist that occurs in the story. Jonny2x4 15:38, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I also suggest having a complete characters section for each game instead of simply listing the bosses in the game. Jonny2x4 15:43, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll start thinking of ways to reduce them. In my defence, I never touched the characters section; The thought of trying to fix up stuff like that tends to frighten me. Larrythefunkyferret 05:45, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Ashtar (Ninja Gaiden)

Your changing that into a redirect was brutal and unacceptable. The article on him you directed to doesn't even have a picture. I must disagree with this, he's the prime villain of the game. Rank is more important than appearance, and he outranks Jacquio. Tyciol 13:13, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever. Role and status alone in the story does not warrant a stand-alone article. Find enough real-world out-of-universe references if you want justify a stand-alone article. Otherwise, its just in-universe fancruft. Jonny2x4 14:18, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Merge discussion for Dragon Ball: Curse of the Blood Rubies

An article that you have been involved in editing, Dragon Ball: Curse of the Blood Rubies, has been proposed to be merged into another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going to the article, clicking on the (Discuss) link at the top of the article, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. --Pixelface (talk) 14:27, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]



Contra: Hard Corps

So, according to your analogy, as long as the characters in the game are totally different, the game is a spin-off? Don't act like you know it all. I use that superior tone for a reason. I definitely know a LOT more about Contra than you do and I know how to look into things. It is not a spin-off because it is an official Contra game and it follows the storyline of the Contra games. Next, and most importantly, Konami confirms that it is canon. So, before you talk, learn your stuff. See, it is actually more pathetic that someone without an account has to correct the one with an account. Learn the meaning of spin-off.

Also, another thing that shows your ignorance: the game DOES have aliens. Plus, it ties in with the previous titles in that an alien cell from the alien wars was recovered. Bet you didn't care about that, either, huh.

Wow. Another self-righteous no account troll. You might want to take a look at Wikipedia:Civility before editing. I don't mind being corrected, but I DO MIND being treated with disrespect (especially when it comes with such a trivial matter like this). First of all, you're correct. The game is canon, but Nobuya Nakazato describes this game as a "gaiden", which means side-story. Just because its a spinoff doesn't mean its not canon. Whereas Contra Spirits is a direct continuation of Contra and Super Contra with Bill and Lance fighting against the alien invaders from previous games. Contra: The Hard Corps, not only centered around a different cast of characters, the aliens were actually clones created by Bahamut and Dr. Mandrake. Jonny2x4 (talk) 21:15, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Learn the meaning of spin-off before bringing this whole thing into a formal-like manner. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.219.152 (talk) 21:27, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spinoff = a product based on previous product. I'm pretty sure I know what the word mean. Anyway, don't act so formal yourself when you're the one who started with the superior tone and arrogance. Next time, you will be reported Jonny2x4 (talk) 21:44, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's the whole def? Or is that a segment of the def that you want to use in order to falsely make me look stupid? Report me, mutha fucka. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.53.146.96 (talk) 22:07, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Whatever. The word spinoff doesn't mean "non-canon" either way. As for making you "look stupid", well why would I want to do that? You're already doing a good job at that yourself. Happy Holidays! Jonny2x4 (talk) 22:36, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Contra 4

First of all, don't point Wikipedia rules at me if you're not going to use them yourself. I should remind you that you're not allowed to edit the same article multiple times a day.

Second, I call them as I see them, the sentence was removed with no explanation by a user doing multiple edits on the same day, this is usually a sign of Fanboyism. If you can't properly explain your actions, then take the consequences without whining.

Duhman0009 (talk) 16:34, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've already explained my actions to you, even though I don't really owe you one. Secondly, the only reason I can see that you're even taking that tone with me is because you're the one who originally added sentence in the first place (as evident by your contributions history) and you were under the impression that I deleted your contribution out of spite. Its really nothing you should've taken personally, but you did and you lashed on me by calling me a fanboy. Have a nice day! Jonny2x4 (talk) 16:49, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You didn't explain it in the "Edit summary (Briefly describe the changes you have made):" section, which is where you should have done so. And yes, duh, I'm to one who added the original content in the first place, doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to figure that out, so you can stop praising yourself :P
So because of you lack of doing multiple edits and NOT explaining yourself in the PROPER area, you're to blame. Also, if you're not a fanboy, why so many edits on the same page? Only 4 types of people do that many editings on a page on the same day: Fanboys, Page Creators, Trolls, People in an Edit War. Thank you and have a nice day. Duhman0009 (talk) 17:02, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I don't pretend I'm the perfect wikipedia editor, but its obvious you're angry at me for deleting your contribution, first by calling me a "fanboy" and then saying I'm "to blame" (of what, since technically speaking I did nothing wrong) and now you're trying to associate me with trolls and people involve with edit wars as well. Yes, I do forget to use the edit summaries most of the time, but I still don't think it justifies petty name calling. The reason why I did some extensive editing to the Contra 4 article on a single day is because I found the original state of the article itself to be rather lacking. One section was copied and pasted from a press release and the lead paragraph was just a plot summary explaining the chronological place in the series' in-universe timeline, instead of the actual development of the game and inspiration for the title. I think I've improved the article quite a bit, even if it still needs a few editing, but you don't even acknowledge that or give actual criticism of my other contributions. You're only focusing on that one sentence I accidentally deleted presumably because of "fanboyism" and blowing it out of proportion. Whatever happened to assuming good faith? Jonny2x4 (talk) 17:20, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There's your problem right, you're NOT suppose to do multiple editing in a single day unless you're the page creator and if you're going to do so, at lease give out explanations. Also, true I really do not care about the rest because I do not care about the game. I was about to purchase it when I noticed that it didn't really any any special DS feature, so I added this in case someone decides to buy it but is wondering about the same thing as I did. As for assuming good faith, not something I practice on Wiki. Duhman0009 (talk) 17:35, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Well I'm hoping you at least understood my position and I'll correct myself next time when it comes to edit summaries (even I know I should use them more often). A few of my friends actually rejoiced when they heard Contra 4 doesn't use the touch screen, so I think the article really needs mentioning that. I personally think not buying Contra 4 because it doesn't support the DS' hardware features is a bit foolish. Its a really great game since its basically what the NES Contra games would've been on the SNES (Contra III was more of a giant boss rush mode for me) and I don't think a game like this in this age would've been made for another platform except the PSP, so the lack of DS-specific features isn't a factor to me. It might be a flaw to you, but its a virtue to me. Jonny2x4 (talk) 17:48, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough mate, take care. Duhman0009 (talk) 19:17, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks for improving Juni and Juli

The Special Barnstar
Thank you for reverting what you thought was an inadequate page move and doing editing work on the old article Juni and Juli it is very nice to see someone tackle a "problem" head on Sin Harvest (talk) 10:48, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer your solution a lot more


Third Energy

Erm... the reason that it was a seperate article is because the "Dino Crisis (Series)" page had been remomoved... cos that page had over 2000bytes of info whilst the page it is now redirected to has a small sentance about it and a link to it which links back to it self. It it possible for you do re-add the article "Dino Crisis (Series)"?.OsirisV (talk) 16:00, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The last thing Wikipedia needs is another overly-detailed in-universe article about a plot element from a semi-notable video game series. Anything that can be said about the "third energy" is simply just plot summary from the Dino Crisis games. I just don't see anything any reason for the article existing other than "Third Energy did this in this game and did that in the other game", which are details that can easily be written into the plot summaries of the individual games. And since Third Energy was already introduced in the original game, it makes sense to redirect the article there. Jonny2x4 (talk) 16:13, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3rd *Strike*

Sheng Long merge proposal

I still have Alan Noon's info, a bit more on the Akuma factor, the SF:TM ending, and the EGM mention all regarding Sheng Long to work into that article, and all are citable. Given nobody has voice an opinion for the merge, mind if I remove the proposal at this point?--Kung Fu Man (talk) 15:32, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, okay. Jonny2x4 (talk) 04:10, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Big Boss (Metal Gear).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Big Boss (Metal Gear).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 23:12, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Black Chamber.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Black Chamber.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rossrs (talk) 14:08, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sorry about edit summary. I see there is a link to source, just no rationale. Rossrs (talk) 14:09, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Turtles in Time arcade flyer.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Turtles in Time arcade flyer.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:59, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Amiba.JPG

Thank you for uploading Image:Amiba.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:55, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MG1 Boss.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:MG1 Boss.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:41, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Metal Gear Gekko.JPG

Thank you for uploading Image:Metal Gear Gekko.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:27, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Heavy Barrel flyer.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Heavy Barrel flyer.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:36, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Jackal & Devil.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Jackal & Devil.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:15, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Hokuto no Jagi.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hokuto no Jagi.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:16, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Hokuto no Ryu.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hokuto no Ryu.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:16, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Gento no Falco.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Gento no Falco.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:17, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Hokuto no Kaioh.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hokuto no Kaioh.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:17, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:GOLAN Colonel.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:GOLAN Colonel.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:24, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kiba Ichizoku.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kiba Ichizoku.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:24, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nanto no Shin.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Nanto no Shin.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:24, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nanto no Shew.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Nanto no Shew.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:25, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Hokuto no Toki.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hokuto no Toki.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:25, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mamiya.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Mamiya.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:29, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Tenrousei no Ryuga.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tenrousei no Ryuga.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:29, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rashou Hyou.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rashou Hyou.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:30, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Yama no Fudoh.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Yama no Fudoh.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:30, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Souther.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Souther.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:31, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Street Fighter Alpha 3 flyer.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Street Fighter Alpha 3 flyer.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:33, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Raiden (Metal Gear).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Raiden (Metal Gear).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:14, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About Gutsoon

You know it's okay to make big changes, but it's supposed to be a group working on the article. It is not okay to delete the whole article and make it yours. I would really appreciate it if you would talk it out on the talk page, you do realize that I put work into that. –Jump Guru 16:50, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I only edited the article so it read less like a lists of magazines and titles and more like an overview of the company's history and clarify a few things (Gutsoon never published Angel Heart outside Japan, only City Hunter). I make no such claim of ownership of the article, I was just being bold. Jonny2x4 15:24, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry about that. That was one of my first articles, and i'll move this to the bottom by the way. I understand what you did. – 「ＪＵＭＰＧＵＲＵ」@Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 16:46, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think we should merge the article, it's talking more about RAIJIN COMICS than Gutsoon! I've also heard they were going to make a shojo magazine called Smile Magazine. – 「ＪＵＭＰＧＵＲＵ」@Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 16:50, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Super Contra

How did you know easily about the Super Contra game for mobile? I'd have never figured it out and now, I'm on a frenzy to get more information. You got good sources, because that's something I'd take probably over a year to know about. Do you know any other site where I can get more information on this game and if the game's J2ME-based? Do you any other "rare" Contra conversions/ports that aren't listed on the Contra articles?

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jonny2x4&oldid=205469625"