Talk:Monte Vista High School (Danville, California)
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Schools Start‑class | |||||||||
|
![]() | California Unassessed | |||||||||
|
just help delete...
"SRV is considered a better school than Monte Vista". I don't know whether it means in the school sport or if it's just being bias.
srv has lower test scores and iirc, mv also did better in sports. so from an academic/sport pov, MV is better than san ramon. however from a personal standpoint the generally attitude of srv was much better than mv. 76.25.115.99 06:33, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Marla Sokoloff
I don't believe Marla Sokoloff went to MV. She would have been '98 or '99 and according to her IMDB bio she moved to LA in '94. [1] --MrCalifornia 00:31, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Bree Olsen
Can anyone confirm that Bree Olsen went to MV or is this just vandalism? --MrCalifornia 16:42, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
I know that her younger siblings have all gone to Monte Vista, however i can't confirm if she did.
Neutral POV
This article has a serious lack of neutral POV, some of which I have tried to correct. It also has extensive amounts of unsourced information and also information that is probably unnecessary, such as the names of the players leading the sports teams. IMO, the article was clearly written by students or, more likely, parents of students at the school. The article should read like an encyclopedia, not a fan club for MV sports teams. Tiger Khan (talk) 04:03, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- While you comment might have been from a while back, I left an NPOV tag on the main page. Also you are correct that the Athletics section is extremely length compared to the rest of the article (which there is almost nothing). --ShakataGaNai Talk 20:33, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Petition To Stop This Page From Being Edited By People Without Usernames
This page seems to attract one or more vandals, so I vote that a moderator place it under some sort of protection. If this isn't the place to make this case, I'm sorry, but I wasn't sure where to go. Tiger Khan (talk) 18:09, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- Unfortunately thats not going to happen. Very few pages qualify for permanent protection, this is not one of them. Also, simply from experience, I can tell you that admin's will not approve a semi-protect on this page because its not vandalized often enough or by different users. In this case, we just have to deal with individual IP addresses that are vandalizing. --ShakataGaNai Talk 20:37, 12 January 2008 (UTC)