Jump to content

Talk:High School Musical 3: Senior Year

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 124.187.50.114 (talk) at 21:05, 13 September 2008 (→‎When Is IT Out?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconFilm Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconDisney Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Question.

Is there any source that states when the film finished production? This article states it was supposed to finish on June 13, but I haven't heard anything really since? Oh, and also, in the opening paragraph, it just seems to randomly say "People magazine, July 7, 2008;" and I don't know what this is for. If someone can help, thanks. --JpGrB 04:31, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a source, but a bunch of blogs were reporting that filming would wrap up on June 30 (it was originally scheduled for June 13 but filming go delayed). Ashley, Zac, and Vanessa were seen outside of Salt Lake City around the 26th, meaning they were all done filming. I'll look into it, but I can't guarantee a good source. But I know that they wouldn't have gone past June 30 because there was an anticipated actors strike. And about the People Magazine comment, I think someone was trying to use it as a source but didn't do it correctly. Snoborder93 (talk) 04:49, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links.

This site has been there for a fews or so, I'm not sure if it should be counted because is is a blog. If someone can comment on this? --JpGrB 04:30, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That would be a blog. It should not be counted as a RS. Smatprt (talk) 05:14, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's what I thought, I'll take it out, thank you. --JpGrB 05:18, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tommy2.net.

Is this a reliable source? --JpGrB 12:57, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

annoyed

the Vanessa Hidgens thing and develpment are no longer needed! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.240.194.88 (talk) 18:58, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Says who? They're still important. --JpGrB 19:00, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the development section but how is the Vanessa Hudgens scandal important to the article? Dontyoudare (talk) 07:31, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was a big controversy on the development and her involvement in the film. Isn't that notable? It had previously been discussed on a minor note here. But of course, it could be open to discussion. --JpGrB 10:02, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How was it a "big controversy on the development"? And as for her involvement in the film that's something that should be in her entry and not the movies. Dontyoudare (talk) 11:32, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, because it was speculated on if she would be in the movie. But like I said, it's fine for a discussion, or even if you'd like to take it out. I just thought that it was important because it was unsure if she would be in the film due to the controversy and Disney's "clean image" thing. Just my opinion. --JpGrB 12:10, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think it should stay. It was specific to her involvement in THIS film, not her entire career. And JpGrB is correct in that it also involves Disney's squeaky image, and how they somehow let it go because of her status. Smatprt (talk) 21:11, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Excuse me, but this article is about HSM3: Senior Year, not how vanessa got to be in it, that info can be on her article. But this article really doesn't need the Vanessa Controversy because it really doesn't matter anymore. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.108.142.240 (talk) 17:09, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The photo thing was almost A YEAR ago, its is no longer necessary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.240.200.249 (talk) 22:01, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Smatprt is correct, it was important to her involvement in this film, and that is important to the article. --HELLØ ŦHERE 06:07, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But it's about HSM3 Senior Year, and i don't see anything on any scandals on the first 2 movie pages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.108.142.240 (talk) 17:33, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That makes no sense. There may not have been scandals this big for the first two movies. This is the female lead in a movie almost being recast or just discarded because of photos, I'd say to have the female lead almost gone is a reason to keep it in the article. --HELLØ ŦHERE 02:48, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with JpGrB. Obviously there will be no consensus to change this so I think it's time to end this discussion. Smatprt (talk) 03:53, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ITS IS NOT IMPORTANT TO THE ARTICLE! DO NOT PUT IT BACK IN! It should be on HER page. get it got it good —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.240.190.145 (talk) 13:37, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Threatening shall get you nowhere. --HELLØ ŦHERE 13:40, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can we just put the controversy under development, since it's about the development on HSM3?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.104.87.166 (talk) 14:47, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, that's not a bad idea, I could agree to that. --HELLØ ŦHERE 01:28, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Seven Main Characters

Kelsi Nielsen is now one of the main cast members of HSM3: Senior Year! She's apart of the doll collection of 7 and before the other profiles came on the HSM3 site, she was one of them on there, so she's one of the main characters, it even says that on Olesya Rulin's article here —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.108.142.240 (talk) 05:47, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the reason she keeps being reverted (not just by myself) is because many people feel there are 6 main characters as shown in the poster. --HELLØ ŦHERE 06:05, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But there are now 7 main characters because Olesya's character is now a main character. just because she wasn't on the poster, doesn't mean she isn't a main character. So the Seven are: Troy, Gabriella, Sharpay, Ryan, Chad, Taylor & Kelsi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.104.87.166 (talk) 14:59, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, the six stars are the ones on the poster. Being part of a doll collection is hardy a justifiable reason and all the major press and articles names just the six. Sorry. Smatprt (talk) 15:10, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But on Olesya's home page and her article, it says that she's has now become a main character this time. And in the doll collection, even if it doesn't matter, it only includes main characters, and Kelsi is apart of the collection. And again, just because she isn't on the poster, doesn't mean she isn't a main character. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.108.142.240 (talk) 17:32, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First, lets use the correct terminology. The article (and the industry) uses the term "starring". "Main character" doesn't really mean anything in the context we are discussing. Having said that, its clear that the six "stars" are the ones on the poster. If Kelsi was "starring" then she would be there too. So unless you can find some reliable third party sources (not her website) that describe her as one of the stars, then no changes should be made to the article. thanks. Smatprt (talk) 21:27, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When Is IT Out?

It is coming out in Cinemas on October 24th

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:High_School_Musical_3:_Senior_Year&oldid=238219485"