Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venusians

Essentially a original researched synthesis of all the claims people have made for inhabitants of the planet Venus. This is not a legitimate subject for a Wikipedia article. ScienceApologist (talk) 18:06, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - it's not original research since it does not "present a conclusion by putting together different sources". It's an outline of where the concept of Venusians has been used in film and literature. ... discospinster _talk 18:50, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The idea of residents of Venus is a well-known and often-used — and non-trivial — concept; the article is not a trivia violation. Nyttend (talk) 20:18, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, massive OR. Corvus cornix_talk 21:26, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep but only because we've got Martians too. And if they're not a problem, then why are the Venusians on AfD? I know, WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS is no excuse, okay, but in that case the Martians should go too. In short: keep them both or delete them both. ~~SIS~~ 21:50, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Let's deal with one crap article at a time. Corvus cornix_talk 22:02, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Shortened my opinion above to prevent confusion. The 'weak keep' stands, though. ~~SIS~~ 01:54, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment We also have Venus in fiction, which isn't great itself, but might have more potential. Zagalejo^^^ 01:10, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I don't see how its in any way an OR synthesis, just a compilation of sourceable material. "Synthesis" would be concluding what the inhabitants were actually like. DGG (talk) 05:06, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Venus in fiction 70.55.203.112 (talk) 05:20, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]