Wikipedia:Peer review/Strawberry Fields Forever/archive3
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for October 2008.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want it promoted to Featured Article.
Thanks, Kodster (heLLo) (Me did that) 22:16, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Comments from Ealdgyth (talk · contribs)
- You said you wanted to know what to work on before taking to FAC, so I looked at the sourcing and referencing with that in mind. I reviewed the article's sources as I would at FAC.
- What makes the following reliable sources?
- http://www.icce.rug.nl/~soundscapes/DATABASES/AWP/sff.shtml
- Written by Alan W. Pollack, a notable musicologist and expert on Beatles.
- http://oldies.about.com/od/thebeatlessongs/a/strawberryfield.htm (note that about.com isn't usually considered a reliable source)
- http://www.beatlesbible.com/
- http://www.icce.rug.nl/~soundscapes/DATABASES/AWP/sff.shtml
- current ref 29 (Beatles Bible) is lacking a publisher
- What makes the following reliable sources?
- Hope this helps. Please note that I don't watchlist Peer Reviews I've done. If you have a question about something, you'll have to drop a note on my talk page to get my attention. (My watchlist is already WAY too long, adding peer reviews would make things much worse.) 13:18, 6 October 2008 (UTC)