Jump to content

User talk:Maxis ftw

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 67.176.27.25 (talk) at 04:16, 5 November 2008 (→‎you sure do think highly of yourself: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Confirmation of access request for ACC

This is my confirmation that I requested access to the Account Creator module. Thank you. Maxis ftw (talk) 05:39, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome!

Hello, Maxis ftw, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! II MusLiM HyBRiD II 23:18, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Maxis, ftw. I was just wondering why my contribution to the Seventh Day Adventist page was "unconstructive". Are you Seventh Day Adventist? If so, then you must acknowledge the truth in my article contribution. This phenomena of hypocrisy when it comes to modesty of self adornment and material possession is a fact. You should try living in Loma Linda, California to understand this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.151.25.115 (talk) 00:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Alright, I wouldn't worry too much. Mistakes happen. I've removed the warning from your talk page, since you've made it clear it was an accidental revert to a previous bad version. You've accidently restored bad content, but thanks for putting the effort in and giving it a go :) If you'd like to learn more about reverting vandalism, see WP:REVERT and WP:VANDALISM, which have some useful tips. Happy editing. SMC (talk) 23:10, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're doing a pretty good job yourself just using the basic undo function. Can I suggest, though, that you warn vandals when they vandalise? This helps the community deal with longer term vandalism by recording an official warning on their talk pages, which, if they record four warnings and then vandalise after their final warning (all within a short period of time, say, a day), will usually result in a block. If you can take that suggestion on it might even make things a little easier on you, since a warned user may think twice about vandalising again. Having said that, you're doing an awesome job with many accurate reverts that I can see. Keep it up! Cheers. SMC (talk) 23:46, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Will do. I'll start warning them with the templates you linked to for me. Cheers!Maxis ftw (talk) 23:47, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just another note about warnings, usually they'll go up in levels - so for the first time the user vandalises, the warning is a uw-vandalism1, second time is a uw-vandalism2, and so on. After vandalism4, if the vandalism still continues you can report the user at WP:AIV. Thanks :) SMC (talk) 00:20, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for telling me! Maxis ftw (talk) 00:42, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Homosexual has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. SunDragon34 (talk) 08:18, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, no-no-no-no. Sorry about that. You did the right thing, for sure! I just hit the revert button on Huggle at the same time you hit undo, and so I ended up accidentally reverting you instead of the vandal. You definitely did the right thing; that was a vandal you reverted--Our reverts simply fell at the same time, and my revert command hit you instead. I reverted myself; see my edit summary on the page history following my accidental undo. Sorry about the mix-up. Cheers! SunDragon34 (talk) 08:30, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Cool, thank you for your understanding. Cheers!Maxis ftw (talk) 08:39, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe, I made a similar mistake (misinterpreting the history page), except I blocked you indefinitely instead of just reverting. Should be back to normal now. — Werdna • talk 11:20, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hey what was wrong with my statement??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.103.39.21 (talk) 08:24, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote, "you guys should shut the fuck up!!!! fuckin nerds and your bullshit!!" [[1]]. That's a personal attack and it's vandalism. Maxis ftw (talk) 08:26, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your rollback request

Hello Maxis ftw, I have granted your account rollback in accordance with your request. Please remember that rollback should be used in order to revert vandalism/spam, and that misuse of the tool, either by revert-warring with others users, or simply by reverting edits that you disagree with, can lead to its removal. For practice, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 23:49, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. I'll read up on the Rollback guide! Thank you Acalamari. Maxis ftw (talk) 23:49, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome! Acalamari 23:52, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hey

I was about as constructive as your mom all i want to do is make a wiki page about me becuz i wanna type my name in and look at it but i cant so ima take it out on wikipedia

BTW, you just said "I was about as constructive as your mom...". That's a personal insult, and its vandalism. And your edits, 1, 2 are not constructive, it is vandalism. Maxis ftw (talk) 02:45, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
I am sorry that you feel so, angered, by my acctions. I meant nothing to offend. I didn't understant what you meant. 02:49, 1 November 2008 (UTC)jakerstien —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakerstien (talkcontribs)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. Much appreciated. Keep up the good work on vandals. --Jackelfive(talk)

Hey anytime, anytime. Happy Halloween to ya! Maxis ftw (talk) 03:15, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your recent morphine rollback

It has come to my attention that you have removed my recent contribution to the page "Morphine". I got the inspiration for my contribution because my grandmother is sick and dying with malignant melinoma. She is heavily dosed on morphine, and one of our running jokes was that it "makes you giddy". Our conversations, you see, are usually tense with her inevitable unbecoming hanging over us. I wrote that contribution as my grandmother's dying wish - she wanted a memento of the happiest times with me. You do not like my contribution, I assume, because of the way it was written. I am from Brooklyn. I take it you do not like African Americans. That's okay. I deal with racism my entire life. Oh well.

Happy halloween. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.176.43.152 (talk) 03:24, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Morphine, IT MAKES YAH GIDDAY!!! (may need citation)" <-- That's what you wrote, and that's vandalism. I root out vandalism and you are a vandal in this case. Thank you again.

P.S.: Calling me a jackass is also a personal attack, which is vandalism too. I'll list that on your talk page. Maxis ftw (talk) 03:26, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see how it is. You're calling my grandmother a vandal because she was African American. I'll have you know that she never stole anything in her life! And you "root out vandalism"?? Are you saying that if my grandmother (bless her soul) was still alive you would say that to her face? I am very disappointed with your professionalism in this matter. GOOD DAY TO YOU, SIR!

Look, God bless your grandmother. I'm saying what you wrote, " Morphine, IT MAKES YAH GIDDAY!!!", is what Wikipedia considers vandalism. I'm using automatic warnings, so I am blind to whatever circumstances you wish to express in your edit. I see what you wrote, and I revert it because it has nothing to do with the article and is considered vandalism. Whoever is behind the computer, is the vandal. If you did it, then you were warned, don't do it again. End of story. Don't think too much into this. As for the warning message, it is auto-generated and automatically added with the reversion. Maxis ftw (talk) 03:33, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...

...for reverting the vandalism on my page. It is much appreciated! Cheers! – Ms. Sarita Confer 10:39, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anytime, Ms. Sarita. Maxis ftw (talk) 18:25, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just Curious

As a relative newcomer to Wikipedia, I was curious about what you found unconstructive about my (admittedly minor) edit to The Tale of the Bunny Picnic. As I recall, it was to correct a spelling error for which I did provide an edit summary. Any information you could give me to clarify would be helpful as I continue to edit on Wikipedia. Thanks! JimVC3 (talk) 19:16, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey sorry about that. I tried to revert my own edit. I was using an automated editing program called Huggle and I accidently reverted yours by mistake. I reverted my own edit back to yours. Sorry for the trouble! As for the warning I striked through above, it's an automated message. Maxis ftw (talk) 19:31, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikithanks!

WikiThanks
WikiThanks

Thank you
for reverting the vandalism on my page.


In other words, Lay off the huggling, and leave some for me! :D —La Pianista (TCS) 20:07, 1 November 2008 (UTC) La Pianista (TCS) 20:07, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

:), no problem! Cheers! Maxis ftw (talk) 20:08, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Its All In A days Work. /\ _ /\ II MusLiM HyBRiD II ZOMG BBQ 21:51, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed that I was the one who welcomed you. O_O Lol. II MusLiM HyBRiD II ZOMG BBQ 00:11, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hoorah! Youre really teh first one who I welcomed that is pretty much active. All the others i welcomed hardly care. Lol, Indeed time does pass fast. Well not always for me. I joined in June, and I feel like that im still in August. O.o And also its pretty random how IPs and new users come up and asking questions like "your only 13, and you edit wikipedia". For some reason, I dont know whats wrong with editing wiki. Lol, anyways. Cheers! II MusLiM HyBRiD II ZOMG BBQ 00:19, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sorry

I thought you were vandlizing because of that weird sig you did. Um could you retype that message again your sig doesn't seem to working on lapianista's userpage.--Spittlespat 22:44, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, Maxis ftw (talk) 22:59, 1 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the revert on my userpage, I hadn't even noticed! He now thinks i'm a bot lol —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bremerenator (talkcontribs) 23:48, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Man that guy is funny. I'll be on the look out for more problems from this guy. Cheers Maxis ftw (talk) 23:50, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

a shiny

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Wow, you really tore into Huggle with a vengeance. The accolades have already started coming in, so I may as well add to the pile ;-) Keep up the good work! J.delanoygabsadds 01:49, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You have utterly no idea how tempted I am to escalate the one-up-man-ship of barnstar giving..... Thanks! And if you're getting comments like that, you must really be doing something right, so good job! J.delanoygabsadds 02:11, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem

Anything I can do to make this place a bit more friendly. Wysprgr2005 (talk) 02:40, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that...

I'd give you a barnstar, but I don't know how...

So thanks again! Wysprgr2005 (talk) 02:55, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're so fast!

How do you do it? I had to remove my AVI notice here because you beat me to it. DigitalNinja 03:08, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply! I already have rollback, so I'll get Huggle!!! YAY!!! Cheers, DigitalNinja 03:32, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And Huggle FTW!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by DigitalNinja (talkcontribs) 03:32, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk page...

... is protected for 9 hours. That guy will have to find someone else to bug. Probably me, but oh well.... J.delanoygabsadds 03:24, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whoo boy! I'll be on the look out for him on your page, don't worry. Thank you again! Maxis ftw (talk) 03:25, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

accusation of Vandalism against Modernism

I am new to Wikipedia. Please can you look at the discussion page for western painting, and my talk page, and explain to me why it is vandalism to suggest to Modernism that he should refrain from making unsourced assertions. I assure you that it was meant as friendly advice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Research Method (talkcontribs) 03:50, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that Research Method, I reverted my reversion on your edit for the article. I was trying to revert another article through Huggle, but I accidently reverted your edits. Sorry again. Here, I reverted it back to what you originally wrote. Maxis ftw (talk) 04:01, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your swift retraction! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Research Method (talkcontribs) 03:53, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Somebody's beaten me to awarding you a barnstar for your superb vandalism-fighting efforts, but one more won't hurt :). I hereby award Maxis ftw the RickK AV barnstar for dedicated vandalism reversion. Your reversions are so spot-on that you're regularly coming under personal attack from malicious users! When I first saw your efforts a few weeks back I was quite impressed. I can't quite find the words to describe it now, except for a great big well done! SMC (talk) 12:22, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. I have approved your request. You may now access the tool here. Before you do so, please read the tool's guide to familiarize yourself with the process. You may also want to join #wikipedia-en-accounts on irc and/or the mailing list. Keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse may result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for your participating in the account creation process. -·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 12:29, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


71.173.156.167

Dear Maxis, I would like to apologize for me stupid behavior.

I would like to tell you that this was just an impulse of my way i feel about presidential candidate Barack Obama.


Steven Renzelt York,PA

Sdthird10

hi sorry for the disturbance

my friends doing it he got my password

Tw3435 is really a spammer

Here is what thing he do:

  1. Post clocks into User talk pages
  2. Lying in the talk pages
  3. Add silly things in pages --125.25.17.39 (talk) 08:53, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thx

Thank you very much for watching my talk page today. That's very appreciated and I apologize for the mess :/ -- lucasbfr talk 09:52, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure the users are unrelated (the attack is coordinated though). WP:RBI all the way here :). -- lucasbfr talk 10:02, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Man

FOR THE TROUBLE IVE BEEN CAUSING. IM STILL A BEGINNER. I didnt know you can use a sandbox for test editing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Youlittlehandsomeguy (talkcontribs) 11:56, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Np

Lol, its cool. II MusLiM HyBRiD II Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja 22:25, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks alot buddy

but it wasn't a "test edit" and it'd be nice if you'd leave my comments on articles alone —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.176.27.25 (talk) 03:56, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

it didn't add anything, eh?

well that's your opinion. the thing i hate about wikipedia is that people like you can delete content because it doesn't fit their opinion I went and fully stated what was meant, do me a favor and leave it alone 67.176.27.25 (talk) 04:04, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

you sure do think highly of yourself

for a guy who can't tell the difference between intelligent and intelligible.