Talk:Elm
Appearance
Please add
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Plants B‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
I've taken out the experimental disambig sidebar - it looked pretty horrible to me. Here's a screenshot of what I got if anybody's interested (trimmed down so just the relevant bit is showing): Image:Elm_article_looking_un-nice.png. --Camembert
Description of species
Why was all the specific information on different species (e.g. height, leaves, bark) written here? They should belong in the article for that species. I prefer a clean simple look to the page, SCHZMO ✍ 19:49, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
- Agree - it needs to be moved to a seperate page, as it takes up way too much space and diverts attention from the more important text below. DWaterson 19:26, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
English Elms
I have put some information in the discussion page of the English Elm article. 78.149.220.232 (talk) 12:04, 26 November 2008 (UTC)