This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Royal Rumble (2009) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Professional wrestling Unassessed Mid‑importance

	Royal Rumble (2009) is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Royal Rumble match

i suppose that umaga would be returning at this P.P.V because he is at the very front of the poster i keep adding the 30 man royal rumble match but gets deleted. Why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.143.87.41 (talk) 22:58, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Even though it will probably happen its still unconfirmed SuperSilver901 (talk) 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Yes we have to wait till it is confirmed. Like at Survivor Series. They usually have a survivor series elimination match but they've had it happen before where it never happened.--WillC 04:05, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dont be stupid! Why would they not have a Royal Rumble match at the royal rumble? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Craigtubby (talk • contribs) 20:47, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will never know why they wouldn't have a Royal Rumble but you never know they could stop the tradition SuperSilver901 (talk) 01:52, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- This Rumble is taking place in Detroit, Michigan at Joe Louis Arena - confirmed. Please edit. Also, the Royal Rumble match is confirmed. Please edit.

You need a reliable source to back up both of those claims. And please sign your posts using four ~. Thanks, ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 14:44, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Rumble 2009 will be held in Detroit at Joe Louis Arena. Friend in radio says station has received promotional material, and Mike Johnson of PWInsider.com has reported it. Rojo101 (talk) 07:25, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First you said it was at the Palace at Auburn Hills and now this make up your mind BTW do you have the URL? SuperSilver901 (talk) 19:59, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's no point in adding the Royal Rumble match if zero of the thirty participants have been announced. JayLethal2008 16:01, 3 November 2008

Exactly its like adding a WWE title match to the Wrestlemania 25 page, sure there will be one but no one knows who will be in it. Bencey (talk) 03:07, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dos Caras, Jr.

It should be noted on the page that he is rumored to debut at this pay-per-view. JayLethal2008 08:32, 4 November 2008

Keyword "rumor," Wikipedia is not a Crystal Ball.--S_RX 14:36, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As i recall John Cena was added on the Survivor Series 2008 page as Rumored to return from injury. The Jay Experience 21:53, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I recall that having a reliable source SuperSilver901 (talk) 22:55, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Should the Poster be remove since it was not made by WWE

What? No it shouldn't, it was made by WWE SuperSilver901 (talk) 00:57, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I didn't right the title, but I have another question. Should we not use the one from WWEAffiliates because it has the date? Also keeps it consistent with the other PPV pages. (Loosie (talk) 16:55, 3 December 2008 (UTC))[reply]

I have no idea why it was changed to the one to InDemand can someone explain? SuperSilver901 (talk) 20:34, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was going by the last years poster. Considering the one from In Demand is bigger and is the full poster. Yes it doesn't have the date but I don't think that is very important. Also are we even sure that WWE Affiliates is even owned by WWE. I've seen no proof of that beisdes a logo and that doesn't mean much.--WillC 22:00, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its an affiliation to the WWE requiring corporate/employee login, although, their image database is publicly accessible. --S R X 23:31, 3 December 2008 (UTC)