|
 Archives |
|
| |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Regarding this RfA, considering this, this, this, and this (admins only), what do you think about me blue-linking this? I'm not asking for a full review, but your quick general thoughts would be appreciated. I've asked a number of opposers from the original RfA to comment here...basically, do you think it's time yet? Thanks! Frank | talk 08:12, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I responded via e-mail. Ecoleetage (talk) 11:50, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I think the "Per Pedro" comments at RFA 1 would indicate where I sit on this.... Pedro : Chat 12:06, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- First time 'round, I opposed because policy experience was just too weak for me to be comfortable. Enough effort has been made in that direction that I would now support with only a reminder to take it slowly at first. — Coren (talk) 13:31, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree with those above. I opposed the first RFA due to lack of experience; she has improved since. I did find this, an incorrect db-nonsense tag that happened on November 24, but that's pretty minor. AFD contribution looks solid. Useight (talk) 16:45, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmm. Still not quite sure with this one. I might have to abstain. However, depending on the strength of the nom, I might be convinced to support ;) —Ceran»^« 22:22, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I would probably Oppose again for the same reason as last time. I have high standards I suppose. I don't like the already slim Project space being almost exclusivley Wikiprojects and AfD. Just like how when I have waffles and syrup, I get the syrup in all the squares; not just two or three, unless I'm feeling silly and want to spell things or make a smily face. But I wouldn't make a smily face an admin.--Koji† 00:30, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Good morning Frank, and thank you for the message. I'm certainly very happy that you think I'm ready for another crack at adminship, but could we wait for another month or so? Although I'm happy with the progress I've made since the RfA, there are some things I'd like to do here before trying again, like perhaps getting my first GA under my belt, a bit more new page patrolling (I notice there's a major backlog there), and perhaps popping down to WP:3O to try my hand at dispute resolution. Also, would you think it'd be a good idea to put my name down for admin coaching, or is this not needed? Bettia (rawr!) 10:30, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Whenever you think is an appropriate time is fine with me; I'll be ready to write a nominating statement. I'm not a real big fan of admin coaching, nor do I participate in such, but I'm not against it, either. If you wanted to find someone to do coaching, there are certainly respected choices. In the meantime, rather than having me act as a coach, if you do have any questions, feel free to simply ask and I'll do my best to answer or direct you to someone who can. My main interest in nominating you is that I thought you were ready the first time and I saw the primary reason for opposing was that folks didn't think you'd been around quite long enough for them to judge. Another month will help that even more. I'm not a regular RfA nominator; I think there's way too much politicking and I'm not into that at all. (That may be a plus or a minus; not sure.) There is perhaps one other candidate I'd be interested in nominating, but I don't have an agenda, a schedule, or even a to-do list. When you're ready, and if you would like me to nominate, let me know. And, if you'd rather ask someone else, or self-nominate, I'll gladly support. Frank | talk 13:27, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Just to chime in again. I agree that admin coaching is not the way to go - there's no need - you'll learn much more delving into to 3O and continuing project space work. However do bounce some queries around if you have any. Ask first act second. I also think you are very wise to wait a month or so - the last RFA was a bit too recent. Maybe I could suggest the start of 2009? Pedro : Chat 13:31, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I would support. Erik the Red 2 ~~~~ 02:25, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I replied...
I have replied to your comments on my talk page. Thanks for dropping by. :) NoSeptember 21:47, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
I replied at my talk page. Regards, —αἰτίας •discussion• 20:28, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Replied again. —αἰτίας •discussion• 21:11, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Once again. —αἰτίας •discussion• 21:36, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Best wishes for the holiday season
Hi Frank. I left a note for you at [[1]]. You're right. I wasn't thinking clearly. Revert if you want. Syntacticus (talk) 08:15, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
|
