Jump to content

Talk:Darko Trifunović

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dusan Trifunovic (talk | contribs) at 22:56, 4 January 2009 (Open to work with others editor to the final version of article). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Dear Chris,

Many thanks indeed. It is not one sided, since we do have in the article on dr Darko Trifunovic new moment. This is decision of the Court of Bosnia. According to the Court decision (some info on that you can find out in Bosnian newspaper) ref [1]. Dear Chris and other Wiki editors, Wikipadia can't publish anything which is against Court Decision. I believe strongly in justice, and one or many newspapers article are not stronger and are not above the Law. Hope that we share same opinion. Most of the quotation's in the article about dr Darko Trifunovic is not a fact and it is consider as personal attack which is again against basic of Wikipadia. You can see that according to the Bosnian media dr Trifunovic is victim of Islamic lobby group ref [2].

Also, you can see that dr Trifunovic are working on very important Project for the whole Bosnia establishing counter terrorism multi ethnic team ref [3] which basically bothered a lot Muslim radical circles in Sarajevo. Nothing has to do with Muslim or Islam as great World religion.

So, my point is to expose some of the very well based quotation against propaganda and personal attack. I am also open to work with you to the final version of article.



Dear George, I agree with you, let's then follow the roles of Wikipadia. Why some editors can make change and other not? Also, it is clear that regarding this article we need more facts. If you are not informed, let me just draw your attention to the recent decision of the Court of Bosnia in favor of dr Darko Trifunovic ref [1]. So it is not a cease any more of "citizenship", it is not a case of "leaving diplomatic service in controversial circumstances" etc....You can find by your self info about Court decision in Bosnian newspapers like this one in ref [2] My strong suggestion is that we need in fact you need to unblock this article for the new facts —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dusan Trifunovic (talk • contribs) 00:23, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


WikiProject iconBiography Redirect‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Governmental 2002 report

Folks,

Plese make reference on mentioned Report, so we can clearly see is dr Darko Trifunovic are author as is stated or something else? Also, we can see then is this report is his or official Goverment Report? We need to clear this.

"Darko Trifunovic is the author of a controversial 2002 report"

I do have problem with many thing mentioned here, so please help me to better understand all.

Reference need to be added also in the part who and when International Court refuse Report in case?

Please help me to undrstand the title: Srebrenica denier is this some kind of accusation? If yes make reference who and when is accused for that or in which legal system or Legal document Srebrenica massacre denile is punishable by law. If sombody opinion do not coincide with sombody else, this is not a crime or reason for accusation. Or maybe I am in wrong?

Many thanks.

Tale —Preceding unsigned comment added by TalesGr (talk • contribs) 03:56, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

in response to the multiply editing of my page

please google the sources about Dr. Darko Trifunovic in order to understand the validity of the information. What you found is sole campaign of Bosnjaci against the western world and fight against terrorism.

Please do not change my page anymore.

thanks.

Oooo, so now we know it's you - Darko Trifunovic - behind these comments? hahahahahaha .... 142.179.67.238 (talk) 21:57, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Update: AlexandarNYC is user Sh3 = Darko Trifunovic, he is slandering Mr Pasalic, he even created page to do that http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:AlexandarNYC&action=history

Look guys, I dont know where you are going with this and I see you probably dont have anything better to do but to patronize me here. I might be Dr. Darko Trifunovic but only in your heads. I wish though but I am still far from doctoral degree, so too bad for me. :) I dont know but maybe you are the one who is using multiple nicknames.I have no need to do that. So LEAVE ME ALONE!

thanks. Sh3 (talk) 13:10, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wiki,

I thing this is to strong. This looks as accusation to somebody. If is accusation can you give me by which law and in which country this is considered as criminal or civil crime? In other hand please remove this title as unappropriate.

Thanks,

Tale —Preceding unsigned comment added by TalesGr (talk • contribs) 03:39, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LeeCorrie, putting in a subtitle "Srebrenica Genocide Denial" is libelous and OR. You are claiming that his views amount to Genocide denial, you don't provide credible and widely accepted sources stating that these views are tantamount to genocide denial.Osli73 (talk) 22:04, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Look

I am not Darko Trifunovic, and please stop changing my content I am going to request ban for you. I am going to change the content one more time, and please read carefully before you decide to do any more changes.

Please read below:

http://www.terrorfinance.org/the_terror_finance_blog/2007/12/al-qaeda-media.html—Preceding unsigned comment added by Sh3 (talk • contribs) 10:10, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blogs are not generally considered to be reliable sources, and it's not necessary to reproduce the contents of a source. Just a few links to newspaper and magazine articles about him, verifying the basic facts, is more helpful than blog entries, and this blog entry doesn't appear to be about Trifunovic anyway. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:13, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've tagged the article as needing references. If references aren't provided immediatly, then all unsourced information should be removed per our policies at WP:BLP. --Farix (Talk) 13:24, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
ok guys I tried to clean up the article littlebit. I did put the reference on the very bottom, directly to the ICT (Institute for Counter Terorrism) in Israel. there is some basic information about Dr. Trifunovic there. (if I am putting this reference wrongly please correct me.) I also added verifyble reference among all other links and you can have look at it: http://www.ict.org.il/apage/16439.php Sh3 (talk) 13:41, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop posting Blogs as references, they are just your personal opinions not reliable sources. Yes you are Darko Trifunovic, I was in touch with you through your email and you confirmed that you are the person behind these nicknames. In my last email I told you what I had to say to you and I ceased contact with you. You should really stop playing those games, it's so obvious and doesnt help your credibility. Bosniak (talk) 22:49, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Look Bosniak, please stop telling nonsense to people. I am not Dr. Trufunovic and it is very stupid way to say such a lie. I was never in touch with you before, dont know who you are. I think you are the one here who is playing games. I am located in Israel and you can see that by my IP address. So - your lies wont work.

And please, stop posting your blogs accusing Dr. Trifunovic for genocide denial. What you are doing is against the law. I will not go into the subject with you, there is no need. Sh3 (talk) 16:01, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sh3, Darko Trifunovic is a Srebrenica genocide denier and there is nothing you can do about it. In Western countries we have a right to the freedom of speech, and you won't change it. Freedom of speech is not against the law (maybe in your twisted mind, but not in Western countries). I support Bosniak's exercise of freedom of speech, as I support everybody's freedom of expression. LeeCorrie (talk) 17:03, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear LeeCorrie, Freedom of speach is one thing, but you call dr Darko Trifunovic Srebrenica denier and this is looking as accusation. In Western Democracy as well as in all democratic countries when you accuse somebody for some criminal of civil act, you need to add reference on accusation in positive Law. As you know there is on going Criminal Process against Mr.Naser Oric and his case is not still over. In April there will be another triale against him at ICTY. So if ICTY find him responsible for killing of Serbs in Srebrenica, we can't talk about Holocuust, but instead about civil war with casulties on both side. So wait little bit with havey accusation. We do have time for that always. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TalesGr (talk • contribs) 03:45, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is not for the editors of Wikipedia to decide wether or not someone is a genocide denier or not or to accuse people of such things. However, if a reliable source (ie major media) has labeled Trifunovic as such, we could/should include this, including the source. Otherwise we should refrain from libelous charges per Wiki policy.Osli73 (talk) 08:49, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reapply {{Unreferenced}} tag

The {{Unreferenced|date=December 2007}} tag should be reapplied to the article. --Farix (Talk) 20:40, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 23:55, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
guys if you look above, I did refeence the article properly yesterday but it was deleted by this propaganda activators, whose aim is to spread the misinformation in order to support terrorism. Please return the article to the full version which includes references. Sh3 (talk) 16:22, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

University of Belgrade Faculty of Security Studies

The first sentence of this article states that Darko Trifunovic is a "lecturer at the Faculty of Security Studies-University of Belgrade", but the Faculty of Security Studies is not included in the list of the 31 faculties of the University of Belgrade. Could someone who knows a bit more about the University of Belgrade look into this? AecisBrievenbus 18:02, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be legit, see: Faculty of Security at the University's website. The article doesn't appear to cover that school/subspeciality but the University website describes it a bit. Doesn't say that Trifunovic is employed or lecturing there (only lists head of the department) but does indicate that the Faculty exists. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 18:17, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm... I couldn't find information that he is lecturing there. LeeCorrie (talk) 17:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The web site of University of Belgrade is: http://www.bg.ac.yu

On this site you will find out listed Faculty of Security Studies

Also, on the following web site you can find Faculty of Security Studies www.fb.bg.ac.yu

OK? —Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexandarNYC (talk • contribs) 22:24, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a week

Due to repeated IP address and new account edit warring on this article, I have applied one week of semi-protection . Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 18:25, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Hallo,

In this article there is several thing which is not true:

"1.Darko Trifunovic is the author of a controversial 2002 report by the Documentation Center of Republic of Srpska in Banja Luka on the 1995"

This questienable report is Report of the State Secretariat of Republic of Srpska for the cooperation with International Criminal Tribunal for former Yugoslavia.

I checked. This gentlemn is not a author. In the Report he is mention as somebody who prepare it. So this is an official Report of Goverment.

Also, in the Report there is no any mentioning of genocide denial. How you explane this? Is it denial of Srebrenica massacre any crimes? If yes, please describe where in which country and by which law? —Preceding unsigned comment added by TalesGr (talk • contribs) 03:36, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


One more thing for the webmaster:

It is stated follwong in the article:"the report, which was rejected as scandalous by the international courts". Can you make any reference on that? I can' find it that International Court rejected or disscused on this matter. On the contrary. Report will be used by Defense in very near future. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TalesGr (talk • contribs) 03:49, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I found these facts about Dr. Trifunovic.
http://www.nato.int/sfor/media/2003/ms031018.htm
http://www.ict.org.il/apage/16439.php
http://rieas.gr/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=257&Itemid=41

I think that these references are enough to prove he is an expert. On the contrary I found that one of wikipedia admins (and I suspect that he in cooperation with someone else) is leading campaign against Dr. Trifunovic. Just go to his wiki page here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bosniak and see the blog he is managing which shows how he is attacking Dr. Trifunovic there. this is the link to the blog: http://srebrenica-genocide.blogspot.com/ and here is the link to one of two posts against Dr. Trifunovic: http://srebrenica-genocide.blogspot.com/2007/12/darko-trifunovic-srebrenica-genocide.html

it is time for wikipedia admins to realize that this is pure propaganda and spread of lies to public. If you people dont realize that this is a threat from terrorism to your peaceful lifes in the whole Europe and world than good luck to you all.
I also can see that many of those who wrote in favor for Dr. Trifunovic were banned and this should tell you the rest of admins that someone here is manipulating content. This should not happen on wikipedia. I would not be surprised if I am banned too tomorrow. Simple implication (talk) 19:42, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked account abuse

The following accounts have been blocked for various policy abuse related to this page. Sockpuppets of these editors will be blocked immediately on detection on this article.

Stop editwarring

Please stop reverting each other back and forth, and use this talk page to come to a consensus on the wording of this article. AecisBrievenbus 22:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If the edit warring continues, I shall protect the article from editing, obviously at the wrong version. AecisBrievenbus 23:55, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Please protect this page from reverting since it is more than evidiental that some extremist/s try to promote hate and Bosniaks propaganda.

online campaign against Dr Trifunovic

Considering the allegations regarding "Srebrenica genocide denial" levelled against Trifunovic in this article I think involved editors should be aware that there appears to be quite an online campaign against Trifunovic by nationalist/Islamist Bosniak groups. All of them are from January 2008, which only strengthens the impression that they are part of an organized campaign. It would be sad if Wikipedia were used in this campaign (wether the allegations are true or not). Any allegations have to be based on notable and verifiable sources. However, if there are such sources, we should not shirk from presenting them, though this must be done in a NPOV manner. Some examples of the online campaign against Trifunovic:

Osli73 (talk) 00:22, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

...wether the allegations are true or not ??? If they are verifyably true then it's entirely appropriate to include it in the article. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 00:28, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, you're right. My wording was a bit hasty. Certainly we should include the claims if they are verifiable. What I wanted so say, was that we should be aware that there exists an aggressive and coordinated online campaign against Trifunovic and that we must watch that any allegations are verified, based on good sources and presented in a NPOV. Keeping up these standards becomes even more important in such situations.Osli73 (talk) 08:53, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I find out this and I delit it because this look like parto of online campaign against Dr Trifunovic. Looks like that all started recently despite that this Govermental report in case is from 2002. So it is clear that somebody is trying to achive some other goals. This report is consider historic, since that Goverment was foce to drow attention to the issue of Srebrenica and publish later of several others report which finaly lead to full awerneses of the problem.

So this part I delited becaus of above mentioned reason: "His works are considered to be fascist by the victims of the Srebrenica Genocide and human rights institutions". [1][2]


Please stop reverting

Please stop reverting each other back and forth. Please use this talk page to come to a consensus. If the editwarring continues, I will protect the article. AecisBrievenbus 21:16, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Smith Jones, Richard Johnston etc...all this fake names is misused by Daniel Zeljkanovic Srebrenicabloggspot.com editor extrime Muslim propagandist

The Bosniak's Message is written by Daniel Zeljkanovic - Srebrenicabloggspot.com editor.

The Lawyer Association of Upper Canada: Reference-Case No.Flle Number2 008-6249-7 Dr Richard Johnstone - misused by Daniel Zeljkanovic founder of Srebrenica Genocide Blog (New York).

Behind fake name of Canadian lawyer Dr Richard Johnstone is Daniel Zeljkovic (he is Bosnian and Canadian citizen), founder of Srebrenica Genocide Blog (New York). He is one of Wikipadia editor also. See at:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bosniak and he post this web site: http://darko-trifunovic.blogspot.com/ where he used the fake name of Dr Richard Johnstone exposing the lies about dr Darko Trifunovic. Now as you can see he present himself as just Richard after been discover by appropriate authorities.

You can see on this web site (http://www.newscloud.com/read/Biography_of_Dr_Dark ... that Mr.Daniel Zeljkovic misuse somebody's photo and misrepresented himself as Canadian human rights and lawyer.


Posted at 10:14 am 1/07/08

My name is Dr. Richard Johnstone and I am lawyer by occupation and human rights activist from Toronto, Canada

So it is a case of proven criminal with clear attempt to manipulate with somebody else name, fabricating the e mails, posting the lies. Such individuals as Daniel Zeljkanovic is web editor and founder of Srebrenica Genocide Blog (New York)????

Not correct citation

Correct version is that you need to make full reference not just out of context.

Osli does not have right to have final say

Important: Dr Richard Johnstone is fake name and surname. It is case of somebody misusing the name and surname of somebody else. So all what is writen under this name is falsification and propaganda by some extremists. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.237.201.48 (talk) 21:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Osli does not have right to have final say as to what sourced facts will be included in this article. I have posted sourced facts. This is not Osli's personal page to remove facts he doesnt agree with. Dr Richard Johnstone (talk) 04:51, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Two comments:
  1. Of course it's no ones personal page. However, neither is it a forum for publishing rumours from questionable sources about living persons.
  2. It is good we now have a source for his suspension from the MFA. However, it was because of questions regarding his citizenship, not for document forgery. I've clarified this. According to an article in Srpski glas summarized in OHR BiH Media Round-up (11/7/2002) "Trifunovic was fired because he has been privy to irregularities in the work of the BiH Mission to the UN. On several occasions he pointed out that some Bosniak diplomats, such as Safet Catovic, have links with terrorist organizations." There is also an English reference of an article in the Banja Luka based biweekly magazine Patriot on the topic.
  3. Given the severity of the "Srebrenica genocide denier" allegations they have to be based on unquestionable sources. Bosnian nationalist websites are not good enough sources.
CheersOsli73 (talk) 08:05, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Osli, you are contradicting yourself. How about EVAN KOHLMAN, Serbian propagandist activist who wrote lies about Bosnian Mujahedeen and you opened Wikipedia article about Bosnian Mujahadeen based on lies propagated by pro-Serbian activist who is celebrated on Serbian Chetnik sites? You are using double standard. Don't you have anything else to do except delete facts you don't agree with on Wikipedia? Get a life man. 142.179.67.238 (talk) 16:46, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is it you are trying to say? Could you please try to give a direct and logical question.Osli73 (talk) 21:32, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You know what I am talking about. You have listed Evan Kohlman as an "authoritative" source for so called "Bosnian Mujahadeen" when in fact this individual is pro-Serbian activist celebrated on Serbian Chetnik sites. 142.179.67.238 (talk) 04:12, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi anon,
  1. Why is Kohlmann a "pro-Serbian activist"? Pls provide a source.
  2. What "Serbian Chetnik sites" are you referring to? Pls provide links.
  3. Even if he is "celebrated" on 'Chetnik sites' this has no bearing on his authority on the subject. Being a published author on the subject, having been invited by the Swedish Defence College, etc. is important in establishing him as an authority.
Osli73 (talk) 08:40, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page protected

Given the continued soapboxing and editwarring, I have protected the article for 2 weeks. Please use this talk page to come to a consensus. AecisBrievenbus 22:08, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You protected it for 2 weeks so you can keep the version you like. This wikipedia is guided by politics, not by facts. You are protecting a Serbian propagandist and you are deleting facts about him, such as the fact that he was fired due to falsification of documents, as stated above. 142.179.67.238 (talk) 04:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop using Wikipedia as a soapbox to attack a living person. Write a blog, or build your own website. And please read meta:The Wrong Version#Boilerplate complaints. AecisBrievenbus 21:03, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the anon. The earlier versions of the article contained information related to Srebrenica Genocide denial. Now removed. Can you give us an explanation because there are other admins as well, and I am going to bring this case to the right address if this continues? Regards. The Dragon of Bosnia (talk) 22:03, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You mean the content that was removed by 87.237.201.48 (talk · contribs)? AecisBrievenbus 00:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Aecis is supporter of Darko Trifunovic, he is removing facts and helping Darko Trifunovic maintain a nice article about his past(ommitting facts about Trifunovic's identity thief past, for which he was fired from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Bosnia-Herzegovina; as well as omitting the facts about Trifunovic's Srebrenica genocide denial). Aecis is guided by politics, not an objectivity. 142.179.67.238 (talk) 03:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism

Bosniak propagandist Jasna Causevic is editor of recently publish text and it can not be consider as appropriate. Recently, Society for Threatened Peoples International - the second-largest human rights organization in Europe - criticized Darko Trifunovic for Srebrenica genocide denial. Source included. Let's stick to facts about this man.Bosniak (talk) 02:47, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've rewritten the section, not titled "Controversy", providing both sides of the story per Wiki policy.Osli73 (talk) 09:37, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia not for off-site fights

It's getting to the point that we need a program to follow who all's playing here, however...

Wikipedia is specifically not a battleground or soapbox. Continuing to try to fight this off-wiki real-world dispute here on this page will result in blocks of accounts. Discussion of content here is one thing - the ongoing edit warring and personal attacks and incivility here are unacceptable.

Policies which must be followed on these pages in the future include (links in shorthand):

Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 00:20, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear George, I agree with you, let's then follow the roles of Wikipadia. Why some editors can make change and other not? Also, it is clear that regarding this article we need more facts. If you are not informed, let me just draw your attention to the recent decision of the Court of Bosnia in favor of dr Darko Trifunovic ref [4]. So it is not a cease any more of "citizenship", it is not a case of "leaving diplomatic service in controversial circumstances" etc....You can find by your self info about Court decision in Bosnian newspapers like this one in ref [5] My strong suggestion is that we need in fact you need to unblock this article for the new facts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dusan Trifunovic (talk • contribs) 00:27, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked users

Related to the dispute here, I have blocked the IP editor User:89.216.162.57, and User:The Dragon of Bosnia.

Osli73: I am placing you on notice here and your talk page that I am concerned that your edits are minimizing the controversy here. That said, I am not reverting anything without further review in detail (and I urge others not to do so). Further uninvolved administrator review is also being sought on WP:ANI.

Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 20:39, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Need for stringent WP:NPOV enforecement given WP:BLP

I believe that the controversy part of the article must be very carefully reviewed to ensure WP:NPOV to avoid breaking WP:BLP. I have reverted the section to the version in [6]. Here is why:

  • The subtitle "Srebrenica genocide denial" is a weasel word, specifically used to tarnish Trifunovic.
  • the text states that Trifunovic is the "author" of the report when the report actually states that it was "prepared" by Darko Trifunovic, it is therefore not clear what role he played in chosing its content.
  • the text misrepresents the report in saying that it states that "only about 100 Bosnian soldiers were killed" while in fact what the report is saying is that about "2,000" Bosnian Muslim men were killed, mainly in combat, and that about 100 Muslim Soldiers were summarily executed (se p 33 of the http[://www.slobodan-milosevic.org/documents/srebrenica.pdf report]).
  • nowhere does the report bring up the issue of whether what happened was genocide or not. Please remember that according to the ICTY, genocide is not a matter of numbers killed.
  • the current text does not provide any rebuttal of the accusation.

Please consider WP:BLP, especially the part stating "Editors should remove any contentious material about living persons that is unsourced, relies upon sources that do not meet standards specified in Wikipedia:Verifiability, or is a conjectural interpretation of a source (see Wikipedia:No original research). The three-revert rule does not apply to such removals" in light of my arguments above. Regards,Osli73 (talk) 21:50, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite

Following the BLP concerns that have been raised, I've completely rewritten the article from a number of new sources. Comments would be welcomed. -- ChrisO (talk) 01:46, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On first inspection the rewrite looks good. Still reviewing it though. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 03:46, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not an easy thing to do given the strong POVs on the subject, but this version looks very good, and a vast improvement over previous versions. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 18:47, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree ChrisO's version is much better - it's well researched, balanced and an improvement over previous versions (including mine). I have just one comment:

  • Srebrenica massacre report controversy: "The report, authored by Trifunović..." I would like it changed to "...prepared by..." since that is what the report actually states (nowhere does it state that he is the "author").

CheersOsli73 (talk) 01:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would like to make it clearer in the article that Trifunovic's views have mainly (or, rather, "only" as far as I can see) been criticized by Bosniaks (including the Society for Threatened Peoples, which is in fact a letter by its Sarajevo office). To begin with, the following sentence - "His views on the subject have, again, been highly controversial" - should be changed to "His views have been criticised by many Bosniak organizations".Osli73 (talk) 09:53, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent additions

An anonymous editor has recently added a lot of new material, but unfortunately it's so poorly worded, blatantly partisan and badly sourced that I've really had no choice but to revert it - it was largely unsalvageable. Particular problems were that many of the sources simply didn't support the statements for which they were being cited (e.g. a link to the Bosnian supreme court website was being used to support a claim about a legal case, but the linked page doesn't say anything about the case) and much of the new material was simply irrelevant (e.g. an entire paragraph about the other attendees of a conference that Trifunovic apparently attended). Additions need to be concise, neutrally worded and accurately sourced. -- ChrisO (talk) 15:20, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Subject does not Warrant an Article

This so called biography should be deleted in its entirety - it is nothing more than an attempt to hinder Dr. Trifunovic in his work. He certainly does not warrant a greatly longer biography than for example: Milan Panic or any number well-known Yugoslav statesmen. What next Wikipedia - attacks on anyone not politically correct by your standards?

Resistk (talk) 02:19, 6 October 2008 (UTC)Dr. Jonathan Levy, PhD[reply]

Article semi-protected indefinitely

As the edit warring on this is ongoing, the article has been semi-protected with no end date. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 02:16, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Editor/s,

The page is protected, but this article were post. How? Look like that there is some editor/s who can add some text prior to other. Please explain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dusan Trifunovic (talk • contribs) 13:47, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


(cur) (last) 09:13, 7 December 2008 Bosniak (Talk | contribs) (41,796 bytes) (→EU Police Mission on Darko Trifunovic: new section) (undo)

This article were post in situation where any other contributor/s can't add....because site were protected. Look that some of the editor/s have more privilege and rights and some non. Please unblock the article for further editing. There is new information regarding this article opposing entirely content of this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dusan Trifunovic (talk • contribs) 13:52, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


EU Police Mission on Darko Trifunovic

An e-mail, supposedly written by Darko Trifunovic, a professor at the Belgrade University, was posted on blog Srebrenica Genocide, in which his stance about the genocide and the victims is more than clear. As the text cites, two men approached Trifunovic on the internet introducing themselves as Stevan Savic. After gaining his trust, they allegedly asked him why he was denying the genocide in Srebrenica. Trifunovic replied: ‘Dear Savo, are you sure you are Serb? What do you care about Muslims? If only Mladic had killed them all.’ Source: EU Police Mission

It is unclear how and who add above reference since article on Darko Trifunovic is locked????? Is this far use of Wikipadia or some have more rights. Also, reference is not appropriately quoted in the article. Just read the reference and then article. It is clear case of misusing the Wikipadia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dusan Trifunovic (talk • contribs) 13:07, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ Trifunoviću zabraniti učešće zbog negiranja genocida - [7]
  2. ^ REAGOVANJE NA BLASFEMIČNI FELJTON O ISLAMU OBJAVLJEN U LISTU PRAVDA - [8]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Darko_Trifunović&oldid=261978084"