Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 January 14

< January 13	Deletion review archives: 2009 January	January 15 >

14 January 2009

Livecare Support

rewritten Alfax (talk) 15:09, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I write to ask to consider the re-written article User:Alfax/Livecare Support. Talking with DS and MZMcBride I tried to explain my point of view. RHaworth told me to write this request.

The article was removed because it was badly written.

In Wikipedia the article Comparison of remote desktop software compares different products and technologies related on Remote Desktop services. Livecare Support is a product for Remote Desktop Software and I would like to put it in that list. I started modifying the article of a competitor; so it's basically the same structure, and the main reason of the article is to describe the differences from Livecare Support and the other softwares.

Please consider my point of view regarding the article:

Since Wikipedia is NOT a business directory we've to consider the article Comparison of remote desktop software.

If this article is published, I think that Livecare Support has to be published, to complete the list of the softwares.

If Livecare Support can't be published, I think it's better to remove Comparison of remote desktop software and all the products detail are reported.

If Livecare Support is NOT published, it will be punished, and I don't understand the reason. If the article is published it's NOT AN ADVERTISEMENT because the Comparison of remote desktop software consider ALL the softwares and not one in particular.

My article is not written in "advertisement-like" style. I hope you consider it, as neutral as I tried to write it. If there is anything you want to modify, please let me know. Thanks. Alfax (talk) 15:09, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not convinced from the proposed draft that the subject is at all notable. I'd prefer to see a few third-party sources written about Livecare Support before moving this back into the mainspace, at the very least. Also, I have added links for Livecare Support above. Cheers. lifebaka++ 16:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep deleted. The article still lacks any third-party reliable sources. On top of that, the nominator's statement "If Livecare Support can't be published, I think it's better to remove Comparison of remote desktop software and all the products detail are reported" raises a huge big red flag for me. Stifle (talk) 16:33, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep deleted. Alfax seems to be overlooking minor criteria such as third party reviews and market share. And I agree with Stifle about their attitude. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:32, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep deleted - The article was deleted because there is not enought reliable source material independent of Livecare Support to maintain an article on the topic. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL doesn't bring up enough info and the topic website[1] doesn't have an in-the-news section or some other section to indicate coverage by independent media sources. -- Suntag ☼ 18:58, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maatkit (closed)