User talk:Dragonfiend

I wish to bring to your attention that Buspar is in fact Xuanwu. He has a strong dislike for you (as may be evident from the fact that the sole content of his sockpuppet's user page is a personal jab at you), and loves quoting wikipedia rules while blatantly disregarding them himself (re: editing of article Strange Candy). If you need proof, look no farther than his incredible narcissism. Also, you might want to check his IP on dates where both users were on at the same time. 138.251.242.2 (talk) 22:19, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an administrator so there's not much I can do here. You might try asking for help on Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets. --Dragonfiend (talk) 01:15, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not very wiki-proficient and am a bit busy with my (rather crappY) full-time job, so I'm afraid there's not much I can do either :(. I guess he'll get away with it. 138.251.242.2 (talk) 17:51, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability in a nutshell

The nutshell summary that leads WP:N is currently under discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Notability#In_a_better_nutshell, which is a continuation of the previous discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Notability/Archive_11#Nutshell. Your comments would be most welcome.--Gavin Collins (talk) 16:27, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Buspar

Hello, Dragonfiend. You have new messages at Troy 07's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Let me add that the SSP case against Buspar was reviewed and there was no sock puppetry. Please don't venue shop that claim any more. There might be some sort of COI editing going on. Please discuss that at WP:COIN, but avoid documenting any user's real life identity, unless they have recently (with current user id) admitted it. Revealing an identity that they are trying to keep private is a violation of WP:OUTING, which can be met immediately with a block, so please don't go there. Jehochman ^Talk 14:48, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RFAR

I have raised a request for arbitration re: NatalieDee article merged with Married to the Sea See Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration-- Spastic on elastic (talk) 22:55, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notice. If I may make a suggestion. it would be to respectfully suggest that you try an earlier step in the process of Wikipedia:Resolving disputes. --Dragonfiend (talk) 02:13, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Dragonfiend. You have new messages at Jac16888's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jac16888 ^Talk 02:11, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Fetus-X.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Fetus-X.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 00:43, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]