User talk:141.154.12.116

March 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. SaltyBoatr (talk) 16:38, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 03:45, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Your inquiry at WT:SPI

Hello 141.154. It's my impression that IPs can't open sockpuppet cases, because they can't create pages. Please consider creating an account, using the button at the upper right of your screen. With an account, you should be able to open a case. Still, it is not easy to sympathize with resorting to SPI so early in a debate, before you've explored the other content-based options at WP:Dispute resolution. I trust you don't expect that a highly-contentious political article will be a walk in the park. Another place you might ask for advice is WP:Editor assistance/Requests. EdJohnston (talk) 16:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Not here to argue

I don't see how engaging in edit wars or violating concensus or 3RR is in your best interest. Please stop. If your goal is to improve that article, you need to start working with the other editors in a calm and respectful way. If you have other goals, I'm not interested. Celestra (talk) 20:52, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Consensus requires discussion. I have a standing offer on the discussion board to all other editors. If anyone can show that the item in question is not a minuscule opinion then I wills top trying to take it out. That offer has now been officially extended to you.141.154.12.116 (talk) 21:06, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

User notice: temporary 3RR block

Regarding reversions[1] made on March 17 2009 to Second Amendment to the United States Constitution

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley (talk) 21:50, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

The material is not controversial. It is paid propaganda by an author who was paid over $400,000 by a gun control group to push the party line and which is further a one man minority opinion which per WIKI NPOV does NOT BELONG in a wiki article. My complaint about this material has been on the talk board for about a month and the only supporting source cited was today. THAT supporting source is the President of the Brady Campaign. He does not meet the standards of being a wiki source since he is much more then likely to be a source of paid propaganda on gun issues. 141.154.12.116 (talk) 22:18, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

---