Promiscuity
In human sexual behavior, promiscuity denotes casual sex between many partners.[1] Behavior includes sex with partners who are not one's spouse. It is common in some animal species. It should not be confused with polygamy. Pursuing sexual relations with multiple women is sometimes pejoratively referred to as womanizing.
In biology, incidents of promiscuity are usually called extra-pair copulations.
Human promiscuity
What sexual behavior is considered socially acceptable, and what behavior is "promiscuous", varies much among different cultures. Behavior that is considered promiscuous for a married or unmarried individual in one culture may be considered acceptable in another culture. Within a culture, men and women are not necessarily held to the same standards. For example, a man may or may not be considered promiscuous for engaging in sexual activity with someone he was not married to, even in cultures where a woman would be considered promiscuous for the same behavior. It should be noted that while male promiscuity previously had glamorous connotations that acted as an affirmation of masculinity, female promiscuity was seen as a sign of emotional instability, and loose morals in women. In some German tribes in the first century BC (according to Julius Caesar in his Commentarii de Bello Gallico) it was pure scandal for a man to have sexual relations before his twentieth birthday, taking some power away from that old stigma about a perpetual ruling class of proud, promiscuous men.
Accurately assessing people's sexual behavior is difficult, since there are strong social and personal motivations, depending on social sanctions and taboos, for either minimizing or exaggerating reported sexual activity. Extensive research has produced mathematical models of sexual behavior comparing the results generated with the observed prevalence of STDs to statistically estimate the probable sexual behavior of the studied population.
The number of sexual partners an individual has varies within a lifetime, and varies widely within a population. In the U.S., a 2007 national survey had the following results: the median number of lifetime female sexual partners reported by men was seven; the median number of male partners reported by women was four. Be it given that the mean number of partners among men and women must be equal, it is possible that men exaggerated their reported number of partners, women reported a number lower than the actual number, and/or a minority of women had a sufficiently larger number than most other women to create a mean significantly higher than the median. Twenty-nine percent of men and nine percent of women reported to have had more than 15 sexual partners in their lifetimes.[2] Studies of the spread of STDs consistently demonstrate that a small percentage of the studied population have more partners than the average man or woman, and a smaller number of people have fewer than the statistical average. An important question in the epidemiology of sexually transmitted diseases is whether or not these groups copulate mostly at random (with sexual partners from throughout a population) or within their social groups (assortative mixing).
A 2006 comprehensive global study (analysing data from 59 countries worldwide) found no firm link between promiscuity and STD's, with poverty and mobility being more important factors.[3][4] This contradicts other studies.[5][6]
Global promiscuity
A 2008 US university study of international promiscuity found that British men and women are the most promiscuous in the industrialised world. The study measured one-night stands, attitudes to casual sex, and number of sexual partners.[7][8][9]
Researchers said Britain's position on the international index 'may be linked to increasing social acceptance of promiscuity among women as well as men'. Britain’s ranking was 'ascribed to factors such as the decline of religious scruples about extramarital sex, the growth of equal pay and equal rights for women and a highly sexualised popular culture'.[10][11][12]
The top 10 ranking OECD nations with a population over 10 million on the study's promiscuity index, in descending order, were the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic, Australia, the USA, France, Turkey, Mexico, and Canada.[13][14][15]
Interestingly, one study[16] found that Westerners were more promiscuous than those in developing countries, while the rate of STDs was higher in developing countries.
Male promiscuity
The words "womanizer", "player", "skirt-chaser" and "rake" may be used in reference to a man who has love affairs with women and will not marry or commit to a relationship. The names of real and fictional seducers have become eponyms for such promiscuous men. The most famous are the historical Casanova (1725-1798),[17] and the fictional Don Juan who first appeared in the 17th century, Lothario from Nicholas Rowe's 1703 play The Fair Penitent. James Bond is also a fictional character that can be considered a womanizer.
During the English Restoration period (1660-1688), the term rake was used glamorously: the Restoration rake is a carefree, witty, sexually irresistible aristocrat typified by Charles II's courtiers, the Earl of Rochester and the Earl of Dorset, who combined riotous living with intellectual pursuits and patronage of the arts. The Restoration rake is celebrated in the Restoration comedy of the 1660s and the 1670s. After the reign of Charles II, and especially after the Glorious Revolution of 1688, the rake was perceived as negative and became the butt of moralistic tales in which his typical fate was debtor's prison, permanent venereal disease, and, in the case of William Hogarth's A Rake's Progress, venereally-caused insanity and internment to Bedlam.
Female promiscuity
Since at least 1450, the word "slut" has been used, usually pejoratively, to describe a sexually promiscuous woman.[citation needed] The terms "slag", "trollop", "skank", "ho", and "slapper" are also used across the English-speaking-world to describe sexually promiscuous women.
Nature versus nurture controversy
Evolutionary psychologists propose that a conditional tendency for promiscuity is inherited from our hunter-gatherer ancestors. Male promiscuity, they say, was advantageous because it allowed males to father more children. Female promiscuity, on the other hand, is said to have allowed female ancestors to have children with superior genetic potential and/or select a male with the better resources.
Primitive promiscuity
Primitive promiscuity or original promiscuity, is the 19th century hypothesis that human race originally lived in a state of promiscuity or "hetaerism".[18][19][20][21][22]
Hypersexuality
A symptom of bipolar disorder (previously known as 'manic depression'), individuals have varying degrees of lack of self control over sexual impulses, which causes promiscuity leading to dangerous behavior or life-threatening results. It is a physical disorder of the brain in which the gates which regulate brain chemicals release too much or too little at one time. Researchers say many cases of promiscuity recorded in history as far back as two thousand years ago, can be attributed to hypersexuality. Medication now exists to effectively control this type of promiscuity, though it is estimated of the 1.3 million women in the USA who have been diagnosed, only 10% are being voluntarily treated.[23]
Extra-pair copulation in animals
In the animal world, some species of animals, including birds such as swans, once believed monogamous, are now known to engage in extra-pair copulations. Although social monogamy occurs in about 90 percent of avian species and about 3 percent of mammalian species, investigators estimate that 90 percent of socially monogamous species exhibit individual promiscuity in the form of extra-pair copulations.[24][25][26]
Two examples of promiscuous animals are the primates chimpanzees and bonobos. These species live in social groups consisting of several males and several females. Each male copulates with many females, and vice versa. In bonobos, the amount of promiscuity is particularly striking because bonobos use sex to alleviate social conflict as well as to reproduce.
See also
Notes
- ^ http://www.answers.com/topic/promiscuity
- ^ New survey quantifies the sex we’re having MSNBC
- ^ Westerners 'are more promiscuous' BBC
- ^ Wellings K, Collumbien M, Slaymaker E; et al. (2006). "Sexual behaviour in context: a global perspective". Lancet. 368 (9548): 1706–28. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69479-8. PMID 17098090.
{{cite journal}}
: Explicit use of et al. in:|author=
(help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Promiscuity fuels spread of HIV/AIDS BBC
- ^ Relation between sexual promiscuity, drugs abuse and HIV infection in Buenos Aires, Argentina. study available at National Library of Medicine
- ^ http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/relationships/article5257166.ece
- ^ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/3536598/Britain-is-among-casual-sex-capitals-of-the-Western-world-research-claims.html
- ^ http://www.upi.com/Health_News/2008/11/30/British_top_promiscuity_study/UPI-98281228072500/
- ^ http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/relationships/article5257166.ece
- ^ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/3536598/Britain-is-among-casual-sex-capitals-of-the-Western-world-research-claims.html
- ^ http://www.upi.com/Health_News/2008/11/30/British_top_promiscuity_study/UPI-98281228072500/
- ^ http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/relationships/article5257166.ece
- ^ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/3536598/Britain-is-among-casual-sex-capitals-of-the-Western-world-research-claims.html
- ^ http://www.upi.com/Health_News/2008/11/30/British_top_promiscuity_study/UPI-98281228072500/
- ^ Westerners 'are more promiscuous' BBC
- ^ Julie Coleman (1999). Love, Sex and Marriage: A Historical Thesaurus. Rodopi. ISBN 9042004339.
- ^ Westermarck, chap. 3 p. 103-4
- ^ Bachofen, Das Mutterrecht, pp. xix-xx, 10
- ^ Bachofen, Antiquarische Briefe pp.20-
- ^ McLennan, Morgan, Lord Avebury, Giraud-Teulon, Lippert, Kohler, Post, Wilken, Kropotkin, Wilutzky
- ^ Bloch, Iwan Sexual Life of Our Time, pp. 188-194
- ^ National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI). Incomplete citation.
- ^ Reichard, U.H. (2002). Monogamy—A variable relationship. Max Planck Research, 3, 62-67.
- ^ Lipton, Judith Eve; Barash, David P. (2001). The Myth of Monogamy: Fidelity and Infidelity in Animals and People. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company. ISBN 0-7167-4004-4.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Research conducted by Patricia Adair Gowaty. Reported by Morell, V. (1998). "Evolution of sex: A new look at monogamy". Science. 281 (5385): 1982–1983. doi:10.1126/science.281.5385.1982. PMID 9767050.
References
- Chakov, Kelly Nineteen Century Social Evolutionism
- Fortes, Meyer (2005) Kinship and the Social Order: The Legacy of Lewis Henry Morgan ISBN 0202308022 pp.7-8
- Lehrman, Sally The Virtues of Promiscuity (2002)
- Lerner, Gerda (1986) Women and History vol. 1: The Creation of Patriarchy [1] ISBN-13: 978-0195039962
- Lerner, Gerda The Origin of Prostitution in Ancient Mesopotamia Signs, Vol. 11, No. 2 (Winter, 1986), pp. 236-254
- Miller, Gerrit S. Jr. (1931) The Primate Basis of Human Sexual Behavior The Quarterly Review of Biology, Vol. 6, No. 4 (Dec., 1931), pp. 379-410
- Westermarck, Edward [1891] (2003) History of Human Marriage Part 1 Kessinger Publishing ISBN 0766146189
- Weston, Kath (1998) Long Slow Burn: Sexuality and Social Science ISBN 0415920434