User talk:Xymmax

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Xymmax}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

This is Xymmax's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives

Index

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by .

Thank you

The Barnstar | My RFA | Design by L'Aquatique

		The Mizu onna sango15 Barnstar
		Thank you to all who participated in my RFA- regardless of whether you supported or opposed, all feedback is important to me. I look forward to proving in the coming months that the trust placed in me by the community is not misplaced. —Mizu onna sango15^Hello!

Talk:Johnny Kitagawa/GA1

You seem to have a tendency to intersperse your comments in among mine in responses. No worries or anything - but at Talk:Johnny Kitagawa/GA1 could you please move each of your responses to the bottom, below my signature in each section? Thanks, Cirt (talk) 22:48, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Sorry, didn't mean to mess up your review. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 00:14, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, thanks for the fix. :) Cirt (talk) 00:23, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IP has returned at Talim

The IP has returned at the article, I think it's time for rangeblock. Momusufan (talk) 18:04, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I wasn't around to help. I see that the article is semi-protected, which is what I probably would have done anyway, because the IP jumped into a different range. Good luck on the article. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 15:44, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Korean Air Lines Flight 007

Hello, I was wondering if you could drop by again and let us know if there's anything else outstanding for this GAN. Thank you. Socrates2008 (Talk) 11:36, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will give it a look tonight. I saw that there was quite a bit of work being done on it, so I figured I'd just wait for the current round of improvement to run its course. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 15:41, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, 'tis done. :) Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 10:44, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, have taken the advice. Socrates2008 (Talk) 11:05, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zena removal

Hi !

I saw that zena has been removed on the purpose that it is not a notable software and thus should not be present on wikipedia. I understand the criteria. We do not want to have a wikipedia entry for each and every project that is started. I still think that it is not the case for zena, even if it doesn't have a huge visibility right now.

The lack of current notability of zena comes from the priorities in this project: quality versus loud noise.

I still think zena has it's place in wikipedia and the latter should not be a place to only list comercial products with high marketing funds.

Thanks for considering the inclusion of the Zena_(software) page back in wikipedia.

Gaspard —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gazoduc (talk • contribs) 18:06, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I deleted this article because another editor had submitted it for proposed deletion, and the article appeared to qualify. The proposed deletion process is only for uncontroversial deletions. This deletion is not uncontroversial since you object to it, accordingly I have restored the article. Please understand, however, that the article may be submitted for deletion again via our Articles for Deletion process. The best way to prevent this is to improve the article so that it is written with a neutral point of view and establishes notability, which has a bit of a specialized meaning on Wikipedia. Please let me know if you need any help. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 12:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

done you may care to comment. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zena (software) 16x9 (talk) 15:26, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	For your participation in the Spring 2009 GAN backlog elimination drive, in which you reviewed 5 articles, you are granted this barnstar! Great work! —The participants on the Spring 2009 GAN backlog elimination drive 21:24, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

In addition, you may use the userbox located at User:Drilnoth/Userboxes/GAN backlog elimination drive to indicate your participation on your user page. Thanks! –Drilnoth (T • C) 21:24, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thankspam

Hi Xymmax, very very belated thanks for your support in my RFA, which passed by an embarrassingly wide margin, there's a full glitzy Oscar style version of my acceptance speech here. The advantage of averaging two or three thanks a day is that I've already clocked up loads of admin actions - mostly deleting attack pages and rescuing stubs at CSD; so any feedback you care to give as to my article rescue work would be very welcome. Ϣere SpielChequers 21:29, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Carl W. Thompson, Sr.

Hi there. You commented on the discussion page for Carl W. Thompson, Sr., so that is why I'm leaving this comment here. I apologize if I should have directed this somewhere else. I have tried to make the article accurate, but the niece of the man in the article has taken upon herself to add statements that are suspect. Carl W. Thompson, Sr. never played minor league ball, so that statement is false. Also, the Stockton Ports did not play in 1973, yet she insists on saying he owned the team in 1971-1973 without any reference to the season they didn't play. If wikipedia wants to protect its credibility, its issues like these that need to be watched. I have tried to make it factually correct, but I no longer wish to engage with the other editor of this article.

Respectfully 98.208.104.14 (talk) 16:57, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]