User talk:Nate1028

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Nate1028 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please provide a reason as to why you should be unblocked.
Change {{unblock}} to {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=original unblock reason |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nate1028 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please unblock I am sorry for me blanking DNA i had no reason to do that and please unblock me becuase i want to finish the article that i am doing

Decline reason:

Sorry, but you're no longer welcome at Wikipedia. You've been warned about vandalism in the past and you shall get no more chances to be disruptive. -- Netsnipe ► 18:07, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Tangerine (novel) - why I reverted it

Somehow, in trying to update the article, you pasted in a whole bunch of garbage, so it ended up looking like this. You had Wikipedia messages pasted all over the place like "Your continued donations keep Wikipedia running!" and "Symbols: ~ | ¡ ¿ † ‡ ↔ ↑ ↓ • # ¹ ² ³ ½ ⅓ ⅔ ¼ ¾ ⅛ ⅜ ⅝ ⅞ ‘ “ ’ ” ¢ $ € £ ¥ Characters: Á á Ć ć É é Í í Ĺ ĺ Ń ń Ó ó Ŕ ŕ Ś ś Ú ú Ý ý Ź ź À à È è Ì ì Ò ò Ù ù Â â Ĉ ĉ Ê ê Ĝ ĝ Ĥ ĥ Î î Ĵ ĵ Ô ô Ŝ ŝ Û û Ŵ ŵ Ŷ ŷ Ä ä Ë ë Ï ï Ö ö Ü ü Ÿ ÿ ß Ã ã Ẽ ẽ Ĩ ĩ Ñ ñ Õ õ Ũ ũ Ỹ ỹ Ç ç Ģ ģ Ķ ķ Ļ ļ Ņ ņ Ŗ ŗ".

Looks like you had selected a whole bunch of text from a Wikipedia page and then pasted it in several times. You really need to look at the page after you make an edit. Fan-1967 14:44, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, you do not need to type your user name to sign a message.

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you.

Secondly, there are serious problems with your latest version. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and should have strictly factual information, from a Neutral Point of view. Sentences like "This review is about a book called Tangerine. If you want to read a good book, I recommend you read Tangerine." are totally inappropriate. We want a factual article about the book, not a review with personal opinion. Who wrote it, when was it published, what's it about? What you think of it doesn't belong. Fan-1967 14:50, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

/* Excuse me */ Replied

i wasnt trying to vanalize that pahe i was trying to give him a barnstar. user: nate1028

I know that now. However, I couldn't tell until I looked at the diff. Some bots might also get confused. Will (Talk - contribs) 21:32, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BTW: You don't need to type the link to sign. Just type ~~~~. For more tips on creating a custom signature, you can see how mine works at User:Will Pittenger#My Sig.

BTW 2: When you start a new conversation on my talk page, please either click the + button or the new handy

symbol. Will (Talk - contribs) 21:32, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Google

Please do not place speedy deletion tags on articles such as Google which clearly do not warrant them. Thanks, Irongargoyle 04:02, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]