User talk:Ttonyb1

Archives

Vuth learns to rock

Hello--

"The film represents a unique accomplishment in cinema, is a milestone in the development of film art, or contributes significantly to the development of a national cinema, with such verifiable claims as "The only cel-animated feature film ever made in Thailand" (See The Adventure of Sudsakorn)[6]"

Since Vuth learns to rock is the first and only Cambodian rockumentary--wouldn't this suffice to be a milestone?

I mean...1) the *first*....2) the *only*...what else is needed? (especially as it has played at an Academy accredited fest in the US, the FL Film Fest) Pls reconsider the "fasttrack" to deletion, I did honestly think it was historically noteworthy, based on comments of viewers who had seen it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johncmorley (talk • contribs) 04:59, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Does this meet general notability guidelines or film Notability guidelines? Playing at a festival does not necessarily create Notability. Has the film won any awards that might make it Notable? BTW - the article is not fast-tracked, you have at least a week to get it up to Wikipedia guidelines. Just so you know, my intent is not to see it deleted, only to insure it meets Wikipedia guidelines. If I can give you a hand fixing this or if I can help in any way please let me know. ttonyb1 (talk) 05:13, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Lost in new mexico

Hi--

I was surprised to see that a standalone reference to Lost in new mexico: the strange tale of Susan Hero" (formerly known as Susan Hero, working title, but all with proper IMDB) would have been fast tracked for deletion, as it has been duly listed as a part of the Cinema in Cambodia page on Wikipedia for over a year http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinema_of_Cambodia

I agree that my first drafts of the article needed editing and clarification, which I have provided. I do believe, though, the the most substantial addition would be the fact(oid) that the movie is a "milestone" in that it was postproduced and finished in post-conflict Cambodia, and therefore it's one of the few post KR (Khmer Rouge) US-Cambodian film co-productions to be undertaken.

This is aside from the fact that the movie does have distribution, and does in fact have an IMDB.

Yea, it's a low budget indie film...but why talk about indie --or even guerilla--films on Wikipedia if rightful examples of these movies can't even be listed?

Thanks for reconsidering, I tried to clarify as best I could... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johncmorley (talk • contribs) 05:07, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John, take a look as my comments for Vuth learns to rock. ttonyb1 (talk) 05:19, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying--

Sure, any suggestions to make more guideline-worthy (Vuth / LINM) appreciated...the fact is both films were made recently in Cambodia, which in itself is noteworthy given the very basic state of the industry there (aside from other items)

If you can provide any bullet points re: either that I can attempt to address, then I would clarify as best I could.

Regards,

JCM —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johncmorley (talk • contribs) 05:28, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure no problem. Again, take a look at the sections above. Focus on verifiable third-party coverage of the films. They will help establish Notability quickly - beware that blogs, Youtube, etc. generally do not fit this. How about awards for either movies or coverage about film making in Cambodia related specifically to the films. ttonyb1 (talk) 05:33, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ttonyb1- On Some Bullshit

let me know if there is anything else. I appreciate your help.

sincerely,

lawrence —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lawrence58 (talk • contribs) 14:07, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Land of Muggy

This article has been tagged for speedy deletion because it seems to have come from another website etc. However, I am the owner of The Land of Muggy copyright: and also The Surkling copyright. And if some of it has come from another website in part probably, if at all, then it is because I own that particular website or have given permission. I have supplied some websites that link from this article as a way of providing varification and more information. I have given permission to various websites, who may have even written a review based on material I have supplied. Some of the sites that have permission are: Triond. Amazon: Lulu: AuthorsDen etc. Given the fact that land of Muggy articles and information is widespread on the web, it is likely that some articles or parts might have been duplicated. So leave it on plaese while I construct a replacement.

G.P.Weston —Preceding unsigned comment added by Geoff Weston (talk • contribs) 21:53, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There are specific Wikipedia guidelines that need to be followed when using copyright materials. Please see WP:COPY for more information. I also believe that unless the original source is marked with a GFDL compatable license, the permission you provide for another site's use, is not accepted for the Wikipedia article. ttonyb1 (talk) 22:13, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Updates regarding Lost in new mexico

Hello--

I have gathered what I believe to be notable links to coverage for "Vuth Learns to Rock":

1) ORLANDO SENTINEL (Coverage of 2009 Florida Film Fest by critic Roger Moore, where the movie was invited to screen in its North American premiere):

http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_movies_blog/2009/03/fla-film-festday-one-parties-and-management.html

2) FLORIDA FILM FESTIVAL - an "A" level, Academy accredited fest, by the way

Coverage and description in their program:

http://www.floridafilmfestival.com/2009/04/vuth-learns-to-rock.html

3) IMDB--> http://farm.imdb.com/title/tt1408338/

4) PHNOM PENH POST

http://www.phnompenhpost.com/index.php/component/option,com_jcs/Itemid,55/crestrictid,21512/task,add/

This is in addition to the other info, ie, that 1) it's the first Cambodian rockumentary and 2) it's the *only* Cambodian made rockumentary, to date.

Not sure what further degrees of clarification are required (or realistically possible) at this point,

Regards,

JCM —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johncmorley (talk • contribs) 03:10, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Be sure to add them to the article; however, I am not sure they quite make it notable. ttonyb1 (talk) 20:29, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On Deleting Speedy Deletion Notices

Sorry man, new to Wikipedia. Didn't realize it was against the rules. Won't happen again. Scrotal69 (talk) 19:45, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem...hang in there. ttonyb1 (talk) 19:46, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On Jacob Ginsberg's article

I have listed sources and discussed why Jacob Ginsberg is a notable person on the article's Talk page. He really is an important person, and deserves to be on Wiki. If you read the Talk page, you'll see how I've described how he fits under the terminology of "creative professional."

Scrotal69 (talk) 19:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at what User:Wperdue wrote in the article's talk page. ttonyb1 (talk) 19:53, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dogeared

Hey Ttonyb1, I wanted to contest my speedily deletion notice. I have been attempting to make this page for a while, and think I have the final thing that will make it wiki appropriate. I am going to do a couple of edits, so before the deletion process is complete check out my edits and additions and, if possible, give me some further description of why it is going to be deleted, if it is still not worthy. Thanks for your time, CMQBDG —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmqbdg (talk • contribs) 18:43, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The biggest problem I see is the lack of independent, third-party references. The refs I see are press releases from the company. See company Notability and reliable sources for information on how to provide support for an article.

BTW - Be sure to add a hangon tag to the article to contest the deletion. ttonyb1 (talk) 18:50, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua Capstick

Joshua has appeared in a number of television programs, he was in over 20 episodes of family affairs, 1 episode of doctors and a film. He's also been in numerous amateur productions with well-known drama groups. His co-star from Family Affairs (Leah Coombe) who is of the same age and has equal experience in the field has a wikipedia page. This page was a first draft and will be updated once it has been verified by Joshua, at the same time I will make any ammendments you see fit, however he is definitely eligible to have a wikipedia page, he has pages on similar websites including imdb. Please let me know what changes/extra information you would like me to add. If you don't know who he is, don't assume he's no one, google him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sendallstars (talk • contribs) 19:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It appears the article fails to meet the criteria set forth in WP:ENTERTAINER. You also need to provide verifiable, third-party resources to support the article. Please let me know if I can answer any questions you might have. Thanks... ttonyb1 (talk) 03:26, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wayland mini coaches

Why on Earth was my article on the bus company Waylands deleted.I tryed to structure it like Anglian buses article. I will now have to retype it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oakington (talk • contribs) 10:53, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure why you marked this as a copyright issue. As indicated in the CSD tag it lack Notabilty under A7 criteria. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations. Thanks... ttonyb1 (talk) 14:54, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vox Jaguars

Ok thank you!Voxfan (talk) 21:46, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Grayson

I'm not quite sure I understand what I need to add to make this more viable in reference to that Creative post. Would criticism do? I have positive and negative criticism of Infernal Madici in a few hard copies over here - newspaper reviews mainly. Would these suffice? I can't find anything else on the internet apart from his web-site. Thanks for your time. Nomanofmode (talk) 02:53, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The section states, "The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." I am no expert as far as poetry goes, so i will ask is it a "a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work" and can that be substantiated? Is the work "...[the subject] of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews?'" If so, provide references that point to that text. BTW - You need to make sure the references all work. ttonyb1 (talk) 03:05, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It also says "has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition" - it was part of the Royal Literary Exhibition in Somerset House, London "has won significant critical attention" - The Independent, The Metro and The Times, and "is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums, or had works in many significant libraries" - from the Oxford University Library to Konigsberg gallery, Russia (where his ancestry comes from). I see someone deleted the article without giving me chance to type this. *Sigh* Nomanofmode (talk) 03:19, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hang in there. What I would do is ask the person that deleted the article to copy the article to a User/sandbox so you can work on it. Add the correct references, including the refs to exhibition and critical attention and when finished, upload it to the main space. Good luck... ttonyb1 (talk) 03:25, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ttonyb1. I'm not sure I understand exactly what that means but I'll do it! Take care. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nomanofmode (talk • contribs) 12:12, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, I should have been more specific. You or an admin can create a "sandbox" that is a subset page of your User page. It would look something like User:Ttonyb1/test_article_Tim_ Grayson. You can create and edit that page without having to worry about it getting deleted.

Sorry for the confusion and good luck. ttonyb1 (talk) 15:31, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CSD "UserBrudder Andrusha/Sandbox"

That would have been CSD R2, because the Redirect goes into another Namespace. I moved the page and a typo occurred. Sorry about that. --Riotrocket8676 ^{You gotta problem with that?} 16:40, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Thanks for the heads up. ttonyb1 (talk) 16:42, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relentless7

TTonyb1, I was actually in the process of updating the Relentless7 article and formatting the references when you started editing it, but since I gotta leave soon, I'll let you take over. Thanks for the effort. Here's hoping this version won't be speedy deleted like the last.

When Jesse and Jordan were still with Oliver Future, I discussed the band's notability under WP:BAND with admins, who agreed that OF was sufficiently notable. I started creating a page for them, only to learn of the schism before I finished. I don't know your interest, but if you are familiar with OF, they have been resurrected as a power trio, and could use a page of their own.

Oh, could you please add a link to the album's amazon.com pre-order page as a source? Thanks.Carlaclaws (talk) 17:07, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tyla brittin

yo dude wad u delate ma creation 4 tyla brittin is abot me ok imtyla brittin —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tylabrittin (talk • contribs) 03:19, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article failed to provide Notability for the individual. ttonyb1 (talk) 05:01, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Daleth

Think we should issue a final warning? He's been posting that repeatedly. -WarthogDemon 05:24, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The admins will most likely catch it when they see the deletion logs associated with the article. ttonyb1 (talk) 05:29, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aoife Madden

Hi Tony, hope you don't mind but I've declined the speedy on Aoife Madden, as playing lead in an RSC production seems quite an assertion of notability to me. Ϣere SpielChequers 23:08, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all and thank you for the message. I was a little reluctant to mark for CSD because of this; however, I was concerned the lead was not adequate because I was only able to find a single reference to the play and her part and that was in the theater's website. Thanks again for the message and enjoy the day/evening. ttonyb1 (talk) 23:15, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and a good whatever your timezone is to you too. It might not survive an AFD but the test for a speedy is whether importance or significance are asserted. I did come close to replacing the speedy tag with {{Notability}}. I found a minor film role and a very minor tv role off imdb, and culled some hyperbole from the article. But there are now two newbies working on it so I'm minded to give them a bit of time and some hints. Ϣere SpielChequers 23:45, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cyclone Airways

Cyclone Airways is a legistimate non-schedules airlines in the Philippines, operating for about 15 years now in the northern Luzon area. Although, it has been in existence for long now, it has remained unpopular due to its choice of business model - that of catering a niche market in Cagayan Valley and Ilocos regions.

Its subsidiary airline Batanes Air is also hoping to exploit Batanes as a tourist destination in the Philippines.

bedcrawl (talk) 09:56, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information, but I am unsure as to why you are telling me this. ttonyb1 (talk) 13:39, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see now. It may be a legitimate airline, but it appears to fail Notability guidelines for a company. ttonyb1 (talk) 13:41, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Atlanta Tamil Church

Hello. Yes, it's acceptable to mark a page with a speedy tag if the criteria apply, even if it's currently under discussion at AfD. Just remember to mention that in the AfD discussion (which you did) in case another editor disagrees with the speedy-tagging. ... discospinster _talk 16:12, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks... ttonyb1 (talk) 16:13, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First Spike Business Operating Services

Hi ... what additional information is needed to get this page unmarked for deletion? Mark Cowan (talk) 03:10, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mark, sorry you are having a difficult time with the article. As someone that has had articles deleted, I know how frustrating it can be.

It appears that the company fails to meet the Notability for Companies guidelines. The guideline states that, "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. All content must be verifiable." It there anything that specifically provides Notability for them? An award for the s/w or an award for best new company or product, etc. How about extensive news coverage? ttonyb1 (talk) 03:19, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tony, Not frustrating at all ... just navigating perception. I do admit it seems that there are some company pages that seem to satisfy the criteria with different levels. There is news coverage of this company.

Mark Cowan (talk) 03:31, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Veritas financial group

Hello, Ttonyb1. You have new messages at User talk:Dank55/Apr.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

- Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 03:25, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]