User talk:Pablo X

Please click here to post a new message. You'll be joining these people. If you leave me a message on this page, I will reply on this page; if I have left you a message on your talk page please reply there, I will be watching it. There's no need to leave one of those ugly {{talkback}} messages.
You can email me if you wish, however I prefer most wp communications to remain on-wiki and also only access this address between about 20:00 and 23:59 Zulu on (most) weekdays; response may be slooooooooow.
This page was last edited by Wheelchair Epidemic.

Damn ye, yellow-bellied sapsuckers, I'm a better man than all of ye milksops put together

User:Pablomismo/bottomtab

Archive 1 (2005—2007) | Archive 2

Deletion of Zvi Ephrat

Dear Sir,

The pages of Adv. Zvi Ephrat (as well as Adv. Pinhas Rubin, Adv. Moriel Matalon and Adv. Ariel Zelichov) were all removed due to copyright infringement.

The picture of the lawyers, is under the copyright of Gornitzky law firm- and i, as gornitzky & Co. representative am using it in this Wikipedia links.

You can see the exact pages on the hebrew version of Wikipedia: http://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%A4%D7%A0%D7%97%D7%A1_%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%91%D7%99%D7%9F

http://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%99%D7%90%D7%9C_%D7%9E%D7%98%D7%9C%D7%95%D7%9F

Can you please bring back those topics you deleted ?

thanks,

Adv. Zohar Fisher (Zoharf@gornitzky.co.il) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gornitzky (talk • contribs) 11:50, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well hello.

I didn't delete it.
I can't undelete it.
It was deleted by User:Somno as a copyright violation. If you are the copyright holder you can release the copyright to Wikipedia under the GFDL, I am not sure how this works but that link should point you in the right direction.
There is a deletion review process which you can undertake, but unless you can provide evidence that this person is notable I think it unlikely that the administrator's decision will be overturned.

Thank you for providing the links to the Hebrew Wikipedia, unfortunately other wikepedias are not seen as reliable sources for the English Wikipedia. (and by the same token, the English Wikipedia is probably not a reliable source for the Hebrw one, but I must admit I know nothing about the inclusion criteria for any other Wikipedia.) pablo_hablo. 12:02, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cubus

Hi Jure

If you have time, please could you take a look at the article Cubus? It has already been deleted once as it was originally an advertisement. There are now some references sources in the article but they all link to Croatian-language articles, so I can't really tell if they are advertising features or real news articles.

I note that the Croatian Wikipedia has similar concerns of the notability of this article, see here - which makes me think that these watches are not very notable at all!.

Would you be able to check out the references listed and let me know roughly what they say?

Thanks pablo_hablo. 13:43, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

¡Hola Pablo!

here you are ... External links on Cubus page

Cubus official site ... is Cubus official page ;-)
Cubus article on moda.hr (in Croatian) ... moda.hr is croatian fashion portal ... and article is something between news about first watch brand in Croatia and advertising ...
Cubus showroom opening article (in Croatian) ... Story is croatian lifestyle newspaper ... and this is realy news article
Vjesnik article on Cubus (in Croatian) ... Vjesnik is croatian daily newspaper ... and this is realy news article

-- Jure Grm, 6^th day of month April, in the year of Our Lord 2009, 17:45 o'clock (UTC)

Zahvaljujući!! I hope that's correct! I think I will leave the Cubus article alone now and see what happens to it. Thank you for your help. pablo_hablo. 16:00, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Little correction: Zahvaljujem! ... Nema na čemu! (You're welcome!) -- Jure Grm, 6^th day of month April, in the year of Our Lord 2009, 18:09 o'clock (UTC)

Thanks again - and a little correction for you: real (noun) but really (adverb). Extra "L". I don't know why! pablo_hablo. 16:21, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I will be check out the references.--Vatrena ptica (talk) 16:35, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On hr.wiki and en.wiki I see the same history, but on English wikipedia edits does the IP user (on Croatian wikipedia this is probably user Streetmode). You know all about external link on article Cubus on Croatian wikipedia.--Vatrena ptica (talk) 16:44, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking at it, Marija - I'm pretty sure it is Streetmode - that user created the original (now deleted) article. It will be interesting to see what happens to hr/Cubus after the 10th of April! pablo_hablo. 19:18, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here you are:

01:34, 11 April 2009 Roberta F. (Talk | contribs) deleted "Cubus" ‎ (Reklama) - Advertising
17:21, 10 April 2009 Saxum (Talk | contribs) deleted "Cubus" ‎ (Reklama) - Advertising
00:09, 10 April 2009 Saxum (Talk | contribs) deleted "Cubus" ‎ (Neodgovarajući sadržaj, istekao rok za popravak) - Inappropriate content, repairing time expired

-- Jure Grm, 16^th day of month April, in the year of Our Lord 2009, 23:53 o'clock (UTC)

Regarding G. Shanmugam

A Good Morning to you (at least it's morning here). To deny a speedy deletion it is sufficient if there are alegations of notability (which in this case were there: "...eminent.." and "...leading the institute to become one of the best self financed...". I agree that the article would probably be deleted via an AfD, but speedy is out of the question. Cheeers and happy editing. Lectonar (talk) 06:55, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

You're being discussed (well, sort of) here [1]. Bali ultimate (talk) 15:46, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blimey, what a drama! Thanks for notifying me, I'll check back in a couple of hours when I get home, but I don't see the point in my adding to that thread at the moment. pablo_hablo. 15:54, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem

No problem, a pleasure. All the best Spitfire^Tally-ho! 20:29, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I'm sorry about the ANI report against you. I guess my plan backfired, I was blocked for a day and a half. I deserved it though. No hard feelings? TomCat4680 (talk) 10:16, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TomCat4680 (talk) has given you a cup of tea, for taking the time to weather a dispute. Thanks for staying calm and civil! Tea somehow promotes WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a tea, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy!

Spread the lovely, warm, refreshing goodness of tea by adding {{subst:WikiTea}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

No worries. pablo_hablo. 13:14, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Article Deletion Squadron

Hey there! You might be interested in this new venture! The fightback starts here! Yeah! Wheelchair Epidemic (talk) 23:07, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]