Jump to content

User talk:ImperatorExercitus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 66.158.193.39 (talk) at 21:00, 28 April 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

can you please stop reverting my edits. I am the original creator of the article and I am updating it to reflect the current landscape of the show. 66.158.193.39 (talk) 21:00, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


| |- |

You're mad!

[1] — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:10, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That I am sir :P Coincidentally, I just happened to edit At_the_Mountains_of_Madness. XD Cheers. I'mperator 13:14, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For you!

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
For combining the refs on the PIAT article in my sandbox Skinny87 (talk) 19:28, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated the article. Nice work! TheLeftorium 12:14, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD closing

With regard to this closing, [2], I would like to note that none of this sub-article content is currently included into parent article, Russian apartment bombings - you can easily check this yourself. I can not merge the content (as your decision seems to imply) because parent article is currently protected. Would you agree to merge content there? Thanks.Biophys (talk) 14:49, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for asking. I did not realize that you are not an administrator. So, you can not help here, even if you wish. I asked an advice from User:DGG.Biophys (talk) 15:11, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • ImperatorExercitus, I am also concerned with your "resolving the charade" in the AfD discussion while the main article remains protected. Does this mean that any POVs opposing the official theory will remain in limbo? --ilgiz (talk) 15:52, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • My opinion was asked, and it is that your closure was not really a good idea for multiple reasons, including the sensitiveness of the topic. Please see WP:NAC The simplest way to handle it is for you to revert your closure and the one for List of deaths related ... and all related edits, and let someone else close, or perhaps decide to relist. I can do this all myself, but I want to give you the chance instead. DGG (talk) 17:55, 27 April 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Toyetic

I noticed your close of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toyetic. The reason I nominated it for deletion instead of just redirecting it is because, according to Wikipedia:Redirect (section WP:PLA), the target article or section should at least mention the redirected word. That's not the case here, and I think it would be awkward to try to fit it in. Powers T 15:36, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

please revert this one also. AfDs continue for 7 days, not 3. DGG (talk) 17:57, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for HMS Seine (1798)

Updated DYK query On April 28, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article HMS Seine (1798), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 18:43, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]