Talk:Lupu Bridge

China B‑class Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Controversy

The riting is almost identicel to the Hangzhoug Gay Bridge, cites, no, sourses and seems quite politacal and biased. --Bollweevil 11:06, 4 October 20 (UTC

The controversy section is obviously totally i dont know. Just look at the wording..NO, using Lovley words like "HEAV" criticised" or "by the pubic and scholars alike". A personal statement - We suggest removal..NO, as there are no sources in the air supportin such a claim...ye init. Tang Wenlong (talk) 01:40, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed.ye so do I LOL..LOL LMAO PMSL- - - - - Unless the section's author come's with more concrete data on "controversy", this section should be removed...NO!!. As for the very existence of controvarsy, of course the project provockd controversy: which large pubic project didn't? This is not an information per se. --bonzi (talk) 18:10, 1 May 2008 (UTC) LOL[reply]

This should be removed until sources are placed and verified as with the article List of bridges wherein China's bridges have been added with claims of havin the "longest" arch/concrete/suspension, etc. bridge in the world with out, verifiable sources. majuro (talk) 00:11, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is a load of rubbish I dont belive in this. —Preceding, unsigned comment added by 81.153.31.150 (talk) 18:04, 28 April 2009 (UTC)</spaz> dont av a clue wat ur on about luvs!!..No offence. [reply]