Jump to content

Talk:Frank Turner

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GetMKWearMKFly (talk | contribs) at 21:58, 23 June 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconBiography: Musicians Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

"Burgeoning solo artist"?

Did Frank's publicity write this? He's not fat.


burgeon

/burjn/

 • verb grow or increase rapidly.
 — ORIGIN Old French bourgeonner ‘put out buds’, from Latin burra ‘wool’.

He wrote "This Town Ain't Big Enough For The One Of Me" so he must be very fat indeed. Ogg (talk) 00:37, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

burgeoning Adjective "that buds, grows or expands; developing" GetMKWearMKFly (talk) 11:01, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Frank Turner Real Damage.jpg

Image:Frank Turner Real Damage.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:04, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Frank Turner Sleep is for the Week.jpg

Image:Frank Turner Sleep is for the Week.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 18:47, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Frank Turner The Real DamageEP.jpg

Image:Frank Turner The Real DamageEP.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 18:48, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Frank turner campfire.jpg

Image:Frank turner campfire.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 19:17, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I FIXED IT. LOOK AT ME! I'M YELLING AT AN INTERNET! Jammus 23:33, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Million Dead breakup

Leaving aside the ongoing investigation into Vchuffter/FrankFakeTurner's vandalism on this article, I'd just like to confirm that beyond the statement released by the band, there was never much more said about the Million Dead breakup? GetMKWearMKFly (talk) 11:20, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


- Hi. There have been several interviews where the band go into detail about Franks outrageous behavior. thanks have a nice a day.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jontyjoesph (talkcontribs) 23:22, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply] 

Hi, Jontyjoesph, in the future please don't remove other people's edits on talk pages - it breaks the flow of conversation a bit, and as this isn't the live article you don't need to worry about verifiability of facts. Also, can you provide links to these interviews? I still don't think there's anything conclusive enough to go into the article, but if you want to provide some evidence, that'd help. GetMKWearMKFly (talk) 23:44, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, I suspect 'jontyjoesph' is the same person who has been harassing members of the Frank Turner message board over the past weekend, and who has been harassing Frank himself through his youtube channel. As I stated on this page (which jontyjoesph has since deleted), there has never been anything further said on the issue of the million dead breakup, other than 'irreconcilable differences'.David2206 (talk) 23:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

I've just noticed the questionable-notability template on the page - I'm pretty sure that his notability isn't in doubt, as a popular and established musician both in the UK and internationally. I'm going to leave it a day, to see if anyone has anything to contribute, then I'm going to remove the template. GetMKWearMKFly (talk) 21:58, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]