User talk:Superbeecat


Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #167

My talk page is archived every 5 days.

Please be friendly, sign your post with four tildes (~~~~). Please comment starting at the bottom of my page. I will reply here, unless you ask me to reply on your page. I'm NOT an admin, but I'll try my best to help you in any way I can, big or small.

hey

lol...sorry for the dumb revert. My friend wrote that, and he was annoyed that it had been changed. -- Silva Storm

no sweat :D

Frank-i-am220

Sorry if you think i vandalised Mick Foley's page but his ring name in JCW wrestling is Cactus Sac.

blue sands

please delete the blue sands page that i created. i realise that i should prepare the page beforehand rather than typing it on the fly. i will put it up again when i have included discussion of its importance

Charlie the Unicorn

Let me know when you have a draft article ready, and I'll unprotect. I don't want to unprotect the title and have to deal with the same raft of one-sentence articles written by 5th graders that we had before. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 01:55, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As per your request as WP:RFPP, I have un-protected Charlie the Unicorn and moved your draft there. Good luck! — Kralizec! (talk) 13:01, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated! - superβεεcat 17:09, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do not continue to re-add links based on questionable sources into the article, especially in the case of the Hitwise claims. The first is to a blog (clearly not allowed under WP:RS guidelines, whereas the SFGate link DOES NOT EVEN SUPPORT OR MENTION what you claim it references - that one is clearly in error. Also, since there now seems to be a consensus building against the Hot Topic link, you would do well to not revert that, or so\imply try to find some actual, independent reliable third-party sources. Do not force me to report you for edit-warring over this, when you do not have Wikipedia guidelines on your side. MikeWazowski (talk) 17:16, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Charlie the Unicorn

I have nominated Charlie the Unicorn, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie the Unicorn (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. - Dank (push to talk) 13:14, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Top Ten Lists

Are notable, I direct your attention to this. Darrenhusted (talk) 13:50, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes they are but see wp:otherstuffexists... which are you referring to? - superβεεcat 01:48, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thornleigh Salesian College

I think you should check the edit log ;) Corpx (talk) 17:51, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Michigan J. Frog

The edit I made is legit, clicking the link for Jay Cocks would have told you that. This is the 3rd time I have made a legitimate edit and within seconds it is reverted, only for me to revert it back (the other two weren't done by you). Is there a reason for this? Are unknown users that untrustworthy, or are users with accounts just so trigger-happy that they revert edits without even checking if they are right. Any help would be appreciated, thanks. 24.79.137.132 (talk) 19:35, 27 June 2009 (UTC) Ok thanks for being prompt, I guess I actually get an account... 24.79.137.132 (talk) 19:41, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]