Jump to content

User talk:Bal537

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gwen Gale (talk | contribs) at 12:59, 7 August 2009 (→‎blocked again: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Bal537's edits

{{subst:User Bal537 is a vandal}

  1. User Bal537 is a vandal.
  2. Ramdasia [Weavers(english), Julaha(hindi)] are not Ravidasia[Cobblers(english), Chamars(Hindi)]. Stop spreading FALSE information.
  3. You have been warned on several occasions before.
  4. You created FALSE page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chamar_ramdasia to spread FALSE information.
  5. You have used spoofed I.P addresses on several occasions to indulge in vandalism on Ramdasia section.
  6. You are posting this same FALSE information on Chamar section too.
  • block

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on Wikipedia. Template:Do not delete This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. This is your only warning.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, you will be blocked for vandalism. Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Singh online121 (talk) 07:39, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Bal537's Edit

User Bal537 is indulging in vandalism and posting bogus information to misguide others.

Warnings

{{subst:User Bal537 is a vandal}

  1. The new section http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Chamar_ramdasia is FALSE and used for indulging in vandalism.
  2. He is creating fabricated stories to misguide wikipedia readers.

July 2009

  1. Stop indulging in vandalism
  2. Stop creating pages to indulge in vandalism

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by some search engines, including Google. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.Template:Do not delete Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Thank you.Template:Do not delete Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons. Thank you.

  • block

ANI

Please visit this spot so we can discuss your recent additions. Thanks. Law type! snype? 12:36, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

warning

Don't remove comments from talk pages and don't make personal attacks as you did here, neither is allowed. Also, please edit from only one account. Moreover, when there is a disagreement, you must gather consensus for your edits and sources on the article talk pages. If you carry on like this, you'll most likely be blocked from editing. Lastly, please sign your posts with 4 tildes (~~~~). Gwen Gale (talk) 02:01, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Sikh Light Infantry, you will be blocked from editing. Hitro talk 07:52, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. — Kralizec! (talk) 17:26, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bal537 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block was not justified. I had added new reference links to the Chamar & Ramdasia discussion page, responding to comments posted by other user asking for proofs. The links provided are valid and include Official Constitution of India and books available on Google books. The other user who has accused me of vandalism has so far not provided any reference links or material to back up his claims. He has constantly deleted my links and edits and then he accused me of being a vandal to the admins when he could not provide reference material for his claims. That was his strategy of blocking anyone who disagrees with his views. I request that you see all the links I have provided and compare it to what the other user is contributing. Also, I have not made any changes to the article and posted these in the article discussion page asking for the other users to respond. Please explain the reason for my blocking.

Decline reason:

Wikipedia isn't about "proof," it's about verifiability, which you haven't met. As you've been told, your sources didn't support your assertions at all. Moreover, you've been warned about this many times, yet you kept posting the same sources and assertions as ever in articles and on article talk pages with no further discussion. This behaviour is called disruption on en.Wikipedia. If you carry on with this behaviour after the block is done, the next block will be much longer. Gwen Gale (talk) 21:37, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:35, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

blocked again

This edit was not vandalism. I have blocked you from editing for three days owing to ongoing disruption and personal attacks. Gwen Gale (talk) 12:59, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruption and personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Gwen Gale (talk) 12:59, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bal537&oldid=306593802"