User talk:TheoloJ
File:Charmaine Sinclair.jpg
Hello. I removed the date from the photo because it wasn't taken in September 2009. — [[::User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] (talk · contribs) 19:43, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Blocked as a sock puppet
You may contest this block by adding the text
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.
TheoloJ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm not a sockpuppet. I have no other accounts. The sockpuppet investigation page said that it is likely I am 'L-Tyrosine' or 'Nibbo'. I am neither of these. I haven't even been online for most of the past week, as I've had no internet connection. + I have made no vandal edits, and have not been involved in any disputes alongside either of these two people, so there would be no reason to have separate account.
Decline reason:
You tripped yourself up here by misstating the evidence. The checkuser found that this account is a confirmed sock of Nibbo 2. Only another checkuser can review the evidence and consider whether the block was correct, but in my experience they only mark "confirmed" when the technical evidence makes a near perfect match. — Daniel Case (talk) 14:21, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
TheoloJ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=[[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nibbo 2|It says]] "Possible It is possible that Nibbo/L-Tyrosine is TheoloJ" - This certainly is not a 'confirmed' and I have not misstated the "evidence". One of the key policies of Wikipedia is to assume good faith, I have never vandalised any articles or used alternative accounts and I have been blocked because it is "possible" that I might be 'Nibbo/L-Tyrosine'. Just look through my edits, I've reverted a lot of vandalism and have made almost 2,000 edits, the only one dispute I have been in didn't involve either of these two editors, so it's not like I have anything to gain through having alternative accounts. & I know the person who used 'L-Tyrosine' in real life, he used to edit Wikipedia often, under a different account, but he forgot the password and made this new one, he stopped editing, but recently made some joke vandalism edits. So that may be why we have similar IP range addresses, as we live reasonable close to each other, but I honestly have no idea who 'Nibbo' is. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=[[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nibbo 2|It says]] "Possible It is possible that Nibbo/L-Tyrosine is TheoloJ" - This certainly is not a 'confirmed' and I have not misstated the "evidence". One of the key policies of Wikipedia is to assume good faith, I have never vandalised any articles or used alternative accounts and I have been blocked because it is "possible" that I might be 'Nibbo/L-Tyrosine'. Just look through my edits, I've reverted a lot of vandalism and have made almost 2,000 edits, the only one dispute I have been in didn't involve either of these two editors, so it's not like I have anything to gain through having alternative accounts. & I know the person who used 'L-Tyrosine' in real life, he used to edit Wikipedia often, under a different account, but he forgot the password and made this new one, he stopped editing, but recently made some joke vandalism edits. So that may be why we have similar IP range addresses, as we live reasonable close to each other, but I honestly have no idea who 'Nibbo' is. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=[[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nibbo 2|It says]] "Possible It is possible that Nibbo/L-Tyrosine is TheoloJ" - This certainly is not a 'confirmed' and I have not misstated the "evidence". One of the key policies of Wikipedia is to assume good faith, I have never vandalised any articles or used alternative accounts and I have been blocked because it is "possible" that I might be 'Nibbo/L-Tyrosine'. Just look through my edits, I've reverted a lot of vandalism and have made almost 2,000 edits, the only one dispute I have been in didn't involve either of these two editors, so it's not like I have anything to gain through having alternative accounts. & I know the person who used 'L-Tyrosine' in real life, he used to edit Wikipedia often, under a different account, but he forgot the password and made this new one, he stopped editing, but recently made some joke vandalism edits. So that may be why we have similar IP range addresses, as we live reasonable close to each other, but I honestly have no idea who 'Nibbo' is. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}