User talk:TheoloJ/Archive 1

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, TheoloJ! I am Calaka and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Calaka (talk) 12:10, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are settling in Wikipedia well! Keep up the great work! I am liking your articles. Calaka (talk) 10:08, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for a kind welcome, it's appreciated. =) TheoloJ (talk) 17:07, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Marhaba TheoloJ! Thanks for joining WikiProject Arab World. We're in need of more active editors. If you need help with anything, please contact me. Salam akhi. --Al Ameer son (talk) 00:40, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Franz C. Kunz[edit]

was indeed a justice of the Michigan Supreme court, and President of the Michigan Bell telephone company, and there are excellent sources to that effect. Either of those offices would be considered notable here. Please be careful in nominating for WP:CSD. The rule is that any indication of any significance or importance is enough to pass speedy. it doesn't even have to be actual Wikipedia notability. It doesn't have to be sourced. (True, the situation was a little complicated here because the author got the name right in the Wikipedia article, but not in the title--I moved it to the correct title.) As a guide to deletion, see WP:Deletion policy, and WP:CSD. A detail: when you nominated for CSD as copyvio, include the link to the site in the CSD tag, even if it is already in the Coren Search Bot notice on the page. It's important to check for yourself, because the bot makes mistakes, such as only part of the article being copyvio. You'll get used to all these details as you go on here. DGG ( talk ) 22:50, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Faccenda Group[edit]

I can see why you nominated it, but I think I've got it into a state where it's a half decent stub and notability is shown. The article history is a total mess, full of vandalism, attacks and advertising. Fences&Windows 01:27, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of PROD from Robin Faccenda[edit]

Hello TheoloJ, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Robin Faccenda has been removed. It was removed by Snigbrook with the following edit summary '(remove prod, add references)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Snigbrook before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 20:57, 7 September 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)[reply]

Spice Girls discography[edit]

it seems as if you should be the one giving WP:OWN a read because you are the one trying to assert ownership by insisting that the article be changed to exactly how you want it. i dont mean to be argumentative but it just seems pointless to me adding extra coding to the page when it makes no difference to the information or layout of the tables. and if it is the prefferred formatting then i havent seen it before in all my months of working on discographies. All the FL's i have seen or worked on have used the simpler one that was already in place. Mister sparky (talk) 16:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revert[edit]

If you care to check I have provided a link to Kenal rise tube station (the departure point, I provide it here as well http://www.allinlondon.co.uk/rail-kensal-rise.php.Slatersteven (talk) 17:34, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Qaeda involvement in Europe[edit]

Don't patronise me by sending 'Welcome to Wikipedia' templates on my talk page and STOP adding material that doesn't pertain to the article in question. If you carry on I shall report you! Vexorg (talk) 22:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I won't ask you again. Please stop putting patronising templates templates onto my talk page. Vexorg (talk) 22:27, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have reported you for edit warring as required by Wikipedia Vexorg (talk) 22:34, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been reported here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard Vexorg (talk) 22:43, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now you are being ridiculous. RUSSIA is NOT in Europe!! Vexorg (talk) 22:13, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you need to go back to school, Russia is a trans-continental country. The reigon of the North Caucasus where the incident occured is located in Europe. TheoloJ (talk) 08:14, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Helpme[edit]

Hello, I have e-mail permission by Charmaine Sinclair to use an image on her article that she e-mailed me, but I'm not sure how to correctly license it. I think the guidelines said that she needs to release it into the public domain, but I'm not sure how to do this, or how to instruct her on how to do it, so any help would be appreciated. Thanks. TheoloJ (talk) 11:11, 15 September 2009 (UTC)}}[reply]

Hi TheoloJ,

All you need is on Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. To summarize briefly:

First, please ensure that this email clearly states that the content can be released under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 license (that is, the exact name of the license clearly appears in it). This step is extremely important, otherwise the text won't be accepted.

If it is the case, send it to the OTRS at the address permissions-en at wikimedia dot org and immediately put the {{OTRS pending}} tag on the article's talk page.

Hope it helps, Calimo (talk) 11:38, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Nadina Coyle - Sep 09.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nadina Coyle - Sep 09.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --J Milburn (talk) 13:52, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Sarah Harding - Sep 09.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sarah Harding - Sep 09.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --J Milburn (talk) 14:11, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Religious response to ART‎[edit]

Thank you for assessing the article. Perhaphs you could review / cleanup / factcheck / add to the Islam section as well? I did my best to cover the Islamic views on the subject but I may have missed or misrepresented something due to my lack of familiarity with Islam. Thank you for your help. Joe407 (talk) 18:16, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't really have anything to add to the Islam section on the article. It seems fine as it it, Good job. :) TheoloJ (talk) 12:47, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of PROD from American-Islamic Forum for Democracy[edit]

Hello TheoloJ, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to American-Islamic Forum for Democracy has been removed. It was removed by Phil Bridger with the following edit summary '(contest prod - Google Books, Scholar and News results show enough likelihood of notability to mean that this shouldn't be deleted without discussion at WP:AFD)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Phil Bridger before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 20:25, 7 October 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages) 20:25, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So sad[edit]

I just read the article you created, Melanie Hall. So sad. I feel sick. It's not your fault. I am logging out for today. President of Chicago (talk) 08:07, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]