User talk:TheoloJ

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

File:Charmaine Sinclair.jpg[edit]

Hello. I removed the date from the photo because it wasn't taken in September 2009. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 19:43, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Blocked as a sock puppet[edit]

Stop x nuvola.svg
You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by MuZemike 22:07, 14 October 2009 (UTC))
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.
File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TheoloJ (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

I'm not a sockpuppet. I have no other accounts. The sockpuppet investigation page said that it is likely I am 'L-Tyrosine' or 'Nibbo'. I am neither of these. I haven't even been online for most of the past week, as I've had no internet connection. + I have made no vandal edits, and have not been involved in any disputes alongside either of these two people, so there would be no reason to have separate account.

Decline reason:

You tripped yourself up here by misstating the evidence. The checkuser found that this account is a confirmed sock of Nibbo 2. Only another checkuser can review the evidence and consider whether the block was correct, but in my experience they only mark "confirmed" when the technical evidence makes a near perfect match. — Daniel Case (talk) 14:21, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TheoloJ (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

It says "Possible It is possible that Nibbo/L-Tyrosine is TheoloJ" - This certainly is not a 'confirmed' and I have not misstated the "evidence". One of the key policies of Wikipedia is to assume good faith, I have never vandalised any articles or used alternative accounts and I have been blocked because it is "possible" that I might be 'Nibbo/L-Tyrosine'. Just look through my edits, I've reverted a lot of vandalism and have made almost 2,000 edits, the only one dispute I have been in didn't involve either of these two editors, so it's not like I have anything to gain through having alternative accounts. & I know the person who used 'L-Tyrosine' in real life, he used to edit Wikipedia often, under a different account, but he forgot the password and made this new one, he stopped editing, but recently made some joke vandalism edits. So that may be why we have similar IP range addresses, as we live reasonable close to each other, but I honestly have no idea who 'Nibbo' is.

Decline reason:

Checkuser evidence is in reality wholly convincing. You are Nibbo 2. The only way you will get unblocked is to convince the blocking checkuser admin, via e-mail, to unblock you. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 16:35, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TheoloJ (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

How can it be "wholly convincing" when checkuser wasn't even able to produce a 'confirmed result'!?!? I've been blocked because there is a possible (not confirmed) chance of being a vandal account - which I am not. This totally goes against the policy of assuming good faith, as there is no real evidence to suggest that I am 'Nibbo', just a "possible" chance. And the only way in which I can be unblocked, is to e-mail the blocking admin (How am I even supposed to know what his e-mail address is!?!?). This is absolutely ridiculous, does logic play no part in admin decisions? I've been blocked because from what I can gather I am from a similar IP range to a vandal, yet if you took a quick look at my edits, you can see I have never vandalised Wikipedia, and there is nothing for me to have gained to make alternative accounts.

Decline reason:

Stop trying to distort what the checkuser reported. This account has been confirmed as a sockpuppet of User:Islaosh. It then goes on to say that the evidence indicates that there may be relationships to other accounts that were not known before. This, however, is beside the point, which is that this account is being used to circumvent a block or ban in violation of WP:SOCK. Ioeth (talk contribs twinkle friendly) 19:09, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Peregian Beach, Queensland
Chief Ladiga Trail
Ethnopharmacy
Roosevelt National Forest
Easter Seals
Jade Starbiz
Milton Keynes Lightning
Caudal cell mass
Aegyptiacum
Tavara
Florida State Road 508
Gabo Reform
Nadym
FORMOSAT-1
Loughgall F.C.
Summer Romance
Holcot
Yue fu
Fontina
Cleanup
Claudio Monteverdi
GripShift
Heraldry of Öland
Merge
Referee
Rasmussem, Inc.
QuickTime Alternative
Add Sources
Anavatapta
Marieta Rigamoto
Australian Red Cross
Wikify
Lohardaga district
Triple talaq
Caitlin Ryan
Expand
Hermann Kant
Korean drama
Gualdo Tadino

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:02, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Charmaine Sinclair.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Charmaine Sinclair.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --EuroPride (talk) 20:56, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Ichthus: January 2012[edit]

Ichthus dark yellow.png

ICHTHUS

January 2012

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

Icthus[edit]

Christianity newsletter: New format, new focus[edit]

IchtusWikiproject.JPG

Hello,

I notice that you aren't currently subscribed to Ichthus, the WikiProject Christianity newsletter. Witha new format, we would be delighted to offer you a trial three-month, money-back guarantee, subscription to our newsletter. If you are interested then please add your name tothis list, and you will receive your first issue shortly. From June 2013 we are starting a new "in focus" section that tells our readers about an interesting and important groups of articles. The first set is about Jesus, of course. We have also started a new book review section and our own "did you know" section. In the near future I hope to start a section where a new user briefly discusses their interests.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 21:02, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library![edit]

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!
WorldDigitalLibraryLogo2.png
Hi TheoloJ! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! EdwardsBot (talk) 19:20, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Tulisa Contostavlos[edit]

A tag has been placed on Talk:Tulisa Contostavlos, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

to revdel four recent defamatory IP edits

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Launchballer 01:15, 14 September 2014 (UTC)