Talk:Ankle

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Medicine Start‑class Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Anatomy Start‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has not yet been associated with a particular anatomical discipline.

eMedicine spam

Came here to find out why my foot hurt, was fed spam instead. Removing it Cosmo7 (talk)

Cankles

Does the "Name Derivation" section really need to be in here? Areynol2 04:04, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i llike it. shows pop culture, useful and interesting 24.16.15.150 08:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's barely encyclopedic, and I've trimmed the unreferenced parts. -- Mikeblas 03:17, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think mention of cankle or thankle is appropriate for a scholarly article. 70.112.111.214 (talk) 00:37, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sexy ankles

i have heard that ankles were considered sexy and not shown in victorian fashion. that should be listed here, maybe with a theory on why the lusted after, i figure it has something to do with the above mentioned 'cankle' 24.16.15.150 08:30, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, in the victorian era was ankels sexy.Håbet 05:39, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Depends who you ask (as with all things "sexy"). May not just be in the Victorian era... BirdbrainedPhoenix (talk) 17:36, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Content

I'm surprised this article is so weak. There's nothing about injury, and the movement section is very much incomplete. I hope that an expert on the subject can add some well-referenced information. -- Mikeblas 03:17, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Error in the Picture

The Picture has both fibula and tibula pointing to the same bone. This is confusing! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.78.102.186 (talk) 09:28, 8 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The Achilles tendon is misspelled —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.200.168.35 (talk) 07:07, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]