Talk:Brian Tyler

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers B‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

Welcome

I'm sure there are topics I haven't been able to cover when I wrote this initial draft of Brian Tyler's entry here on Wikipedia. I don't have his birthdate or birthplace, for one, and I haven't categorized this entry yet. Noelle De Guzman 04:42, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup Notice

I marked this article from cleanup because this article is full of unsourced claims ("He is a multi-instrumentalist who plays piano, classical percussion, guitar, bass, bouzouki, mandolin, keyboards, and drums"), unverifiable opinions (i.e. "one of the top young composers in film today") and just seems NPOV all-around. I removed a completely redundant section but the article could really use a good scrutinizing. --Do Not Talk About Feitclub (contributions) 01:18, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I began writing this article, but I do hope the NPOV stuff didn't come from me. The quotes you refer to all come from one single edit by an IP address[1]. I don't see the cleanup tag on the article page itself though. 122.52.30.192 16:59, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry, that was me forgetting to log in before writing my reply. --Noelle De Guzman (talk) 17:01, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Other Fast And The Furious Movies

i believe he did the music for the first FATF movie too i have music from him from the first movie soo of ya wanna fix this or check it out for the page it would be great

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was no consensus. —harej (talk) (cool!) 19:57, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Tyler (composer) → Brian Tyler — No need for "(composer)" since the page name belongs to one person. FrankRizzo2006 (talk) 12:48, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Actually, there's a Brian Tyler (actor) and a Brian Tyler (racecar driver) as well. Brian Tyler should be a disambiguation page. Jafeluv (talk) 14:45, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Creation of a disambiguation page seems sensible. Tassedethe (talk) 22:54, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support. By all 3 suggested criteria at WP:PRIMARYTOPIC - incoming links, pageviews, and google results - this Brian Tyler is fairly clearly primary use (even if you discount pageviews for lack of a hatnote). In addition, all but one of the numerous links to the Brian Tyler redirect were intended for this article (I fixed the one). The other two articles are stubs and should be listed at Brian Tyler (disambiguation). Station1 (talk) 06:27, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC / target already directs here. Disambiguation article not needed since a succinct hatnote already does the trick. If more Brian Tylers are added, then consider the DAB page. — AjaxSmack 22:41, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

1979?

How could a man whose career started in 1997 have a cue used in Star Trek in 1979? I'm assuming that's a mistake, right? Any idea what it should be instead? Nerrolken (talk) 22:56, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]