Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turkiate society
- Turkiate society (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Original Research, term does not exist in google scholars or books. Source cited has no quote or reference and looks like a primary source (a lexicon). Russian, Sassanid, Abbassid,etc. empires have never been associated with such terms. GoshtaspLohraspi (talk) 21:44, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —LadyofShalott 21:52, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. —LadyofShalott 21:53, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - I can find no sources at all to verify the content of this article. Therefore (and with a nod to the appropriate sentiment) I am inclined to agree with the nominator's assertion that this is WP:OR and should be deleted. Crafty (talk) 21:54, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- Delete although I originally was a merge (I proposed it) I am now going to say delete because, as the nominator said, the one source cited is not used. Gosox5555 (talk) 22:32, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- Comment The one source is apparently by Mahmud al-Kashgari and from the 11th century. LadyofShalott 22:38, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. While I also agree that assuming good faith is vital, the original editor has a history of creating content forks and other unusual splits of articles. Combined with the nominator's findings of no mentions at Google Scholar et al, I see no reason to keep this article, even as a redirect to Mahmud al-Kashgari. — C.Fred (talk) 23:11, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per the above. An 11th century source doesn't disqualify the subject, but the fact that there are not more recent mentions of the topic is telling. No objection to a keep (with cleanup) if additional sourcing becomes available - maybe some offline book unavailable through Google, for example. But I see no evidence of that. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 14:31, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
The article is based on saying of someone in 11th century. Hitler was also talking about great Germany, but that can't be called Germaniate Society. Nothing in the name of Turkiate society has ever existed in the whole history. علی ویکی (talk) 22:06, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Arattaman
Turkiate society and Persianate is analogous to eachother and proposal of existance of Turkiate society word is dated to 1000 years ago but Persianate society word is proposed in 20th or in 21th century, but WHY you do not say this for Persianate society article? Are thies Discrimination to Turks? I Request you allow this article remain and after short time you will see that thousands lines and handreds references will be added to this article. Arattaman (talk) 08:19, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
- DO NOT Delete
Here is wikipedia and it is FREE encyclopedia. I am agree with arattaman. Please ALLOW this article remains.Jimmycardiel (talk) 08:28, 17 December 2009 (UTC)