User talk:Thatguyflint

If you feel that I have reverted an edit or issued a warning in error, please click here and let me know. I am human, and I do make mistakes. Please don't interpret an error on my part as a personal attack on you. It's not, I promise. I ask you to simply bring it to my attention; I am always open to civil discussion. (I will respond on your talk page.) Thank you.

re: your message

Hi Thatguyflint, I've left a reply to your message on my talk page -- Marek.69 ^talk 04:55, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

link to Batman: The Animated Series

hi there. i'm translating that page to russian. thanks for turning back my link for russian page :) now i've made it less bold. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kurt Wagner (Russia) (talk • contribs) 08:33, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind words. $Thatguyflint$ ^{Talk to me!} 21:10, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Following your recent request at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback, and the edits you've made since, I've re-reviewed your contributions, and would be happy to grant you rollback if you still want it. Let me know if you do, and I'll set the permission for you. Keep up the good work! — Tivedshambo (t/c) 13:26, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly, and for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. — Tivedshambo (t/c) 17:05, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thank you for your outstanding work reverting vandalism. MMS2013 23:16, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Little Orphan

I have requested semi-protection for The Little Orphan. Since you have reverted several times already, you may wish to chime in here. Thanks! — Spike Toronto 22:13, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cal Ripken, Sr. Collegiate Baseball League

Anything we can do about the guy who's been sitting on the page recently? I'm not well-versed in Anti-Vandalism techniques, so I don't know if I was right to request semi protection for this article. It's been getting out of hand with this particular vandal. Is there any way to block his IP? Thanks for the help with reverts, by the way. Kithira (talk) 02:03, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kithira! I am also fairly new, so I will let you know my understanding of the situation; however, you may want to ask someone more experienced if I am correct in my assumptions...This type of situation seems to be first dealt with by reverting the edits in question, and then warning the vandal on their talk page. I have done so here. It seems as though this particular user is headed for blocking, but may decide to cease their unconstructive edits. If the user does not, semi or full protection may be decided upon by an administrator. Thank you for your interest in and help with the encyclopedia, and I f I can help any more, please don't hesitate to contact me. $Thatguyflint$ ^{Talk to me!} 19:54, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You guys are idiots. My page was clear, concise, and accurate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Huhnad (talk • contribs) 20:12, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

While your edits may very well have been "clear, concise and accurate", they had no place in the Cal Ripken, Sr. Collegiate Baseball League article. If you would like to make a page about the "Patrick Malone Donation Fund", there are methods in place for that purpose.-- $Thatguyflint$ ^{Talk to me!} 20:33, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the assist, ThatGuy. Kithira (talk) 23:01, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user talk page

Appreciate it. --Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:50, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No prob!-- $Thatguyflint$ ^{Talk to me!} 21:52, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Steven Seagal

THE TRUTH IS NOT VANDALISM - Steven Seagal WAS rejected by the OCSD for his ties to organized crime and he NEVER attended ANY police academy in California - EVER. (unsigned by 96.41.73.122)

Hello! The information you placed on my talk page and the article may very well be true, in which case your edit dispute would be with user:NeilN, not me. What I reverted was the contention that the subject was an "alleged" actor, which is clearly not true. Whether or not he is an effective actor is certainly up for debate :), but he is definitely an actor. You can use the talk page for the article to discuss that. Thank you for your interest in Wikipedia, and I hope you do not let this incident prevent you from contributing constructively. $Thatguyflint$ ^{Talk to me!} 23:26, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HOLY SHIT I'M SORRY!

GOD, I'm a retard. I am SO SORRY!!!! J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 04:22, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

*gives J.delanoy an odd look for the above remark* Anyway. About the IPs that keep attacking J.delanoy's page, don't bother warning them. They're all a super-banned user or his cronies, and warning them is just wasting your and the server's time. They're not going to stop. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 05:10, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

		The Userpage Shield
		Placed in recognition of this editor's efforts in watching over User talk:tide rolls. Tiderolls 05:12, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you're an award type person...feel free to delete this if you think it frivolous. I do want to thank you for the reverts on my page. Keep up the good work Tiderolls 05:12, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Exor674 & this edit

I believe the user was reverting vandalism here. SMC (talk) 15:26, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, between my eyes seeing the vandalism and my finger pushing the button! $Thatguyflint$ ^{Talk to me!} 15:29, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know exactly what you mean! Ah, RC patrol. SMC (talk) 15:30, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Collisions are awesome, heh! Exor674 (talk) 15:32, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Knock off the bogus vandalism warnings

I sent the message to the wrong user, I put it on the Talk page of the person who had edited the article just prior to me, and not to your Talk page. I'm trying to fix it, you keep putting up these bogus vandalism warnings on my Talk page and I don't appreciate it. 99.166.95.142 (talk) 17:13, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 99.166.95.142. Please accept my humble apologies for reverting your edits. My laptop's touchpad is extremely sensitive. $Thatguyflint$ ^{Talk to me!} 17:13, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For your excellent counter Vandalism edits... arun talk 18:44, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

140.180.18.151

Thank you for dealing with 140.180.18.151 for Same-sex marriage ; might I ask you to handle the 3RR filing on him? He's well over for the day, but with a wiggling baby on my knee, I'm too distracted to figure out how to post the diffs. - Nat Gertler (talk) 20:40, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind words, NatGertler. However, since the issue is controversial, even contentious maybe, and that would be the first 3RR report I have done, I must regretfully defer to you or someone else that has more experience in these matters. $Thatguyflint$ ^{Talk to me!} 21:36, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hi

you made a mistake at the one part. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.14.176.102 (talk) 17:14, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

what

you sent me a message. i dont get it{{{{{{}}}}}}

Message from 142.23.72.178

DUDE i put caman mcelligot is scarfaces biggest fan and you erased it! thats the truth and its a good fact whyed you remove it man? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.23.72.178 (talk) 21:20, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 142.23.72.178. While your contention that "caman mcelligot is scarfaces biggest fan" may very well be true, it is not encyclopedic. I am placing a "Welcome" here below this message, which contains links to many helpful pages, so that you may better understand Wikipedia's policies, and contribute constructively. Thanks for your interest in Wikipedia, and happy editing! $Thatguyflint$ ^{Talk to me!} 21:31, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bye and Happy Christmas

Please accept my advanced Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.I will not be able to wish you on those days as I will be taking a Wiki break for one month starting tomorrow. Also wishing you a Happy editing.. :) arun talk 06:49, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for your instant vandalism protection work on "Perspectives II High School" I really appreciate it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Slocking (talk • contribs) 21:34, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are very welcome. $Thatguyflint$ ^{Talk to me!} 21:36, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

adding phone number for Dish Network

Why will you not let me add the phone Number for Dish Network Ordering? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.184.12.135 (talk) 22:52, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 74.184.12.135! I have removed your edits which placed a phone number due to the following: Wikipedia is not a directory (Entry #3). I thank you for your interest in and helpful though slightly misguided edits to Wikipedia, and hope that you will stay and help us. You may wish to read the welcome page for more tips on what is and isn't appropriate here. Also, please remember to sign any posts with four tildes (~~~~), so that other users can know who posted and where to respond. Thanks again, happy editing! $Thatguyflint$ ^{Talk to me!} 23:07, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yoko Ono

man im just spreading the truth —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.127.213.170 (talk) 01:41, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not. $Thatguyflint$ ^{Talk to me!} 18:40, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zebulon Pike

You reverted a change I made, which was trying to establish just exactly who "Calhoun" was. This was the only mention of him in the article and so I tried to draw attention to this error. I just made some more changes in an attempt to discover who "Calhoun" is.

Regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.12.252.113 (talk) 04:10, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 165.12.252.113! Thanks for not taking my revert badly! If I might make a suggestion: The article's talk page might be a more appropriate place for questions and comments of that sort. By being bold one would probably revert or undo the edit, and then post the question on the talk page. It would probably be a good idea to use the edit summary to let anyone know that you felt the information had no place in the article. Thanks, and happy editing! $Thatguyflint$ ^{Talk to me!} 04:21, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ADMIN-bubby9534

Are you a wikipedia administrator? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bubby9534 (talk • contribs) 18:32, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bubby9534. No, I am not an administrator. I hope that my revert was not taken as overstepping my bounds by you or anyone else. The part that is bothering me is that I can't seem to find the revert in question. I believe this is due to the page having been deleted. I was using Huggle, and therefore I think I can safely say that I determined the edit to at least look like vandalism, but without seeing it I can't say for certain. Is it the deletion you are wondering about? $Thatguyflint$ ^{Talk to me!} 18:41, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If it is indeed the deletion you are wondering about, you may wish to ask User:SchuminWeb or User:Acroterion. It looks to me like Acroterion thought of the article as a test edit and SchuminWeb speedily deleted it. $Thatguyflint$ ^{Talk to me!} 18:46, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bubby9534 (talk) 19:16, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Bubby9534 (talk) 19:16, 14 December 2009 (UTC)Hi!Bubby9534 (talk) 19:16, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

sorry... for spamming...

but there's this one thing... how can you delete those things so fast! And the guy below's complaining I had that too, but not with you... I actually contributed good information and some ippropriate humor, it lasted a few days then boom! Deleted... on the times square ball article. This seems pretty unfair, but if they don't like any changes at all, why do trhey put that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.24.250.160 (talk) 00:50, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Response here $Thatguyflint$ ^{Talk to me!} 01:10, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hey you deleted something that was relevant

I recently added a few sentences to the article puppy, that i and others, would find relevant. I would like an explantation. I feel this was rude and uncalled for, thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mendelson1123 (talk • contribs) 23:52, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not. $Thatguyflint$ ^{Talk to me!} 23:56, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Upon further reflection, I have decided that it would be more wikipedia-like for me to address your concerns. I also believe that puppies are cute and adorable, but I don't think the information is encyclopedic. Please refrain from placing this type of information. You may wish to read the welcome page for more pointers. I apologize if you found my edit to be rude and uncalled for. Thanks for your input and happy editing! $Thatguyflint$ ^{Talk to me!} 23:43, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hello Can I PLEASE add on your November 17th Page that it is my Best friend’s birthday... She is moving away forever tomorrow and i told her i could get her name on Wikipedia... Please. Even if it only lasts for an hour. As long as she sees it, it will make my day. Please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.99.227.26 (talk) 21:22, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Response here $Thatguyflint$ ^{Talk to me!} 21:37, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Moroney

We have removed all unsourced "negative" material from the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yizhuang87 (talk • contribs) 22:50, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Response here $Thatguyflint$ ^{Talk to me!} 22:54, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is not unbiased

I had revised it to exprees only Henry's views. The reason why I did is because the existing views were not his own and were biased in nature. Please edit the content to express his views and not that of his enemies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Doc1st (talk • contribs) 23:12, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Every single comment in the "views" contains peoples opinions of Henry morris views. I say that they are his views just to let people know that they are his and not someone elses. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Doc1st (talk • contribs) 23:22, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Response here $Thatguyflint$ ^{Talk to me!} 23:48, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Doc1st (talk) 23:52, 19 December 2009 (UTC) Hi there, I cant figure out how to get to the talk page, this is my first time using wikipedia. I was looking at henry morris's page and thought it was a shame how they had done that to him. I just want it to express his views not peoples criticism. Doc1st (talk) 23:52, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To Doc1st: every WP page has "discussion" tab at the top. Clicking it would bring you to the talk of that page (unless it is a talk page already :-). Materialscientist (talk) 23:54, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

okay.

Doc1st (talk) 23:55, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]