User talk:Oda Mari

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by .

This is Oda Mari's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2: 14 days

Simon in Sagamihara

Hi! You left a welcome message believing that Simon in Sagamihara was a new user. Anyway, I noticed this edit summary from him in response to your edit. I warned him, telling him that his edit summary was inappropriate. WhisperToMe (talk) 02:36, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Domo, domo. Thank you. Happy editing! Oda Mari (talk) 04:23, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Japan-Korea disputes Third Opinion

Hi there, thanks for your response! I have copied the post you left on my talk page to the article talk page and responded there. Mildly Mad^T_C 14:23, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the revert

Thanks for the revert on my talk page. Looks like he's blocked. Cheers. BC _{talk to me} wfo 01:10, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. Happy editing! Oda Mari (talk) 04:46, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for your kind sympathy, Oda Mari. Yes I look forward to going "pink" again. I was thinking about doing an outrageous, shocking film by Hisayasu Satō as my first article, as a sort of "revenge", but maybe I'll let it go for now... It wouldn't make me feel any better about the situation, and lots of more pleasant articles await :)... Best regards. Dekkappai (talk) 17:51, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Daiko Group

Any chance you can try to find some sources for this article? I'm having trouble finding any, and you may have access to more ways of finding them I do. It's currently up for deletion, so any help is greatly appreciated. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 05:38, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I tried, but I could find only this one. IMHO, since their business is a kind of background work, they are not covered by the media. Oda Mari (talk) 15:59, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind summarizing that article for me? It has too many business terms I don't understand. I appreciate your help. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 18:02, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, would any of these be useful as references? ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 18:09, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Though Daiko is translated as Daxing, I think this G translation is not bad. Ask me if there are sentences difficult to understand. The company's site is here. As for the link you provided, they are all job information page links. Oda Mari (talk) 04:42, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your POV deletion

I reverted your massive deletion without proper rationale on the properly sourced material to Kofun period. Such the "unexplained edit" labeling mostly applies for "unexplained blanking", not for additions of contents with academic sources. You can guide the editor Objectiveye (talk · contribs) in dispute with you, to use proper "edit summary", but that does not excuse for your wholesale deletion of the material for your POV. The article is already heavily biased for Japanese POV with a lot of primary sources. Since you're an established editor, I don't give a template warning like I gave it to some newbie today, but you should've behaved better than that. If you want to contest the edit, you're all free to open a discussion at the talk page and invited the said user. Good luck.--Caspian blue 18:36, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Goju ryu

I read your comments on the external links you deleted from the goju ryu page. There are several issues to discuss about those links. First of all, they do not convert the wikipedia in a repository of links since those two links you deleted were carefully selected by editors after some consideration. It would be nice to know why you replace them with links to some particular organizations. Specific Goju ryu organizations have their own section in the article; you can find it under "Branches of Gōjū-ryū Karate" at the tab on the bottom side of the page. So if links to specific organizations have a different place, then the purpose of the "informative links section" (or "external links section", as you call it) should be discussed before further editing. Please check the discussion page of the article. I will present the issue for editors to discuss. I will also delete the whole section until we reach an agreement. Alfredo elejalde (talk) 10:57, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]