User talk:Supergabbyshoe
An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Gabby-shoe2009 (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
Please use this link to create the category page
(The page will be pre-loaded. All you need to do is save it)
Archives |
---|
Welcome!
Hello, Gabbyshoe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like CableLink, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 02:09, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of CableLink
A tag has been placed on CableLink requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 02:09, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
"new" TV stations
Hi, I have observed that you are adding "new" stations on several TV networks. Did you get this new list from the NTC? Please provide valid sources on this additions since most of them are possible hoaxes. (Example: 3 TV stations for the same TV network on one province is not possible.) Thanks. -danngarcia (talk) 08:35, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Re: Present shows on previously aired shows on TV5 article
Don't blame me for those additions, check out the edits of User:ArnoldDumlao. He's the one who adds them. -danngarcia (talk) 08:24, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
File source problem with File:DZMM2009.png
Thanks for uploading File:DZMM2009.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:12, 4 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 14:12, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
File source problem with File:DZMMTR2009.JPEG
Thanks for uploading File:DZMMTR2009.JPEG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:13, 4 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 14:13, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Solar TV
I have nominated Solar TV, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar TV. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ViperSnake151 Talk 12:42, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Howard's Message to Me
I have an understanding with that user that he had to remove schedules for American TV articles first. I'm also in favor of their removal, as long as it is applied consistently. –Howard the Duck 13:48, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Please post your comments in English
I noticed that you have posted comments in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. -WayKurat (talk) 17:10, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Im sorry for that. -Gabby (talk) 17:12, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Cignal Digital TV Article and other Philippine and Asian Cable/Satellite TV Vandalized Article
Hello!!!
Can you block this IP user 112.200.246.4 is also the same IP users as [User talk:112.200.224.120|112.200.224.120]], 112.200.129.26, 112.200.231.104, 112.200.210.102, 112.200.140.201, 112.200.207.230 among other IP users are tying to vandalized articles like Cignal Digital TV and other Philippine Cable and Satellite Articles like SkyCable and even Asian Cable and Satellite Articles like Indovision inserting suspicious news about future channel and non program channels using Philippine actor and actress, which is not true at all.
Please help to solve this problem to block this user at all. Im begging you!! Puppyph