Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devachan

Devachan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a Blavatsky neologism and consequently a content fork of Helena Blavatsky. Wikipedia does not benefit from every word made up by Blavatsky having its own article page. Ash (talk) 12:33, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. -- Ash (talk) 12:35, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's a term used by a large number of published authors, not just Blavatsky as the GBooks hits clearly show. It's also not a content fork and more than heaven is a content fork of Bible. Edward321 (talk) 00:44, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 02:10, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. -- Ash (talk) 02:36, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Ash (talk) 02:37, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per previous poster. __meco (talk) 09:16, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep is a notable term with regular use. jackson5alive (talk) 09:22, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]