This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Discussion of "cannibalism"?! What is actually meant by "cannibalism" here?
In the "Reception", there is a discussion about the existence or possibility of cannibalism in the ideal Stoic society. The article seems a little confusing here. Did either Zeno or Chrysippus actually endorse cannibalism???
I think that what the article is actually trying to say, but what it is not expressing quite clearly, is that Chrysippus allowed for the consumption of *dead* human bodies to feed the population, since he might have argued that a dead body (animal or human or whatever) serves no more utility to its original owner and it can thus be used by the people for their own survival. This would in line with the general Stoic disregard for death and disbelief in an afterlife. (Others would have found this deeply disturbing because the consumption of a dead body would have prevented its proper burial under the appropriate religious rituals, thereby denying the soul of the deceased entry into the afterlife: no ritual burial after death ---> no life after death.) That would make a lot more sense, but I can only speculate. I find it really difficult to believe that cannibalism of *live* human beings would have been supported or defended by either Zeno or Chrysippus. However, I am only working from a general knowledge of Stoic philosophy as a whole, so I do not know what is exactly stated in the texts.
Can someone who actually has the relevant texts at hand and is more knowledgeable about the sources comment on this? What exactly is meant by "cannibalism" here? The eating of *live* human beings or of their *dead* bodies? This would seem to be a paramount distinction - from an ethical point of view.... 128.12.94.248 (talk) 09:32, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]